155) Tracking The King Of The South From Seljuk Turks To The Ottoman Empire

1090 – At the same time that one motley crew of illiterate peasants seizing control of a wilderness island at the edge of the known world at the Battle of Hastings was heralded as a great feat, the Seljuq Turks in a whirlwind advance seized control of the most civilized and wealthy territories of what is known today as Iran, Turkmenistan, and northern Afghanistan, and kept on going.

selcuk-empire

 

The Great Seljuk empire was made up of an astoundingly diverse range of linguistic and ethnic groups, and religions including Muslims, Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians in a loose political confederation meeting mutual interests. Like OPEC.

True to the endless battle for control of the land east of Eden, Rome’s East Thema / Eastern Administrative Division at Constantinople battled for control of the area against the Arab Islamic Caliphates in  eight major Crusades between 1096 and 1291. Later historians – NOT documents at that time – designated the region controlled by Rome the Byzantine Empire, after the original Greek name of Byzantium, changed by Roman Emperor into his name of Constantinople. Whether or not intentionally, this deflects attention from Rome’s continuous control in this regions. The more reality-grounded sailors called this territory The Levant which meant ‘the rising’ or ‘to rise’ referring to how the land rose up out on the horizon of the sea when sailing towards it, and this appellation has stuck to this day.

The First Crusade was proclaimed by Pope Urban II, whose position as head of the Catholic Church had strengthened through wars on the frontiers of Western Christendom to direct armed force in the name of religious causes. Over time, the crusading movement expanded to include campaigns against pagans, Christian dissidents, and other enemies of the papacy into the 18th century.

 

The Massacre of Jerusalem was a mass slaughter of thousands of Muslims and Jews by the sieging Crusaders in mid-July 1099. Historians and eyewitness crusader accounts emphasize that the massacre was especially brutal, even by the standards of ancient and medieval warfare, a “juxtaposition of extreme violence and anguished faith. Eyewitnesses described it as “more of a slaughter than a fight”,  “the slaughter was so great that our men waded in blood up to their ankles”, and at “the porch of Solomon men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins… the blood flowed so forcefully and deeply that it carried the severed limbs and heads down the avenues of the city.”The death toll in the temple alone reached 10,000″ and “none of them were left alive; neither women nor children were spared.” Crusaders brutalized the bodies of dead Muslims, “eviscerating them from the head to the kidneys and cutting them lengthwise from left to right,” and many were decapitated, hit with arrows, and burned alive. The Crusaders then ran amok through the streets of the city, stabbing everyone they encountered – Muslim, Jew and Orthodox Christian alike. From a population which had numbered 40,000 the few remaining were sold into slavery. Such a massacre in the city has seldom been paralleled in the history of war. 22

In 1187 Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi—known in the West as ‘Saladin’—recovered Jerusalem. In contrast to the Crusaders’ slaughter, he granted amnesty and free passage not only to the resident Catholics but also to the defeated Christian soldiers, as long as they were able to pay a paltry ransom for themselves. He allowed the native Christians to remain and Jews who had been expelled from Jerusalem by the Crusaders to resettle in the city. Salah Al-Din also restored the rights of pilgrimage to several eastern Christian denominations who were condemned as heretics under Rome’s Theodosian Code.

This fits a prophecy from Isaiah 41:25

  1. “I have raised up one from the north / , and he shall come:
  2. from the rising of the sun [east] shall he [another] call upon my name: and HE shall come…as the potter treadeth clay [crushing the northern king].

CDN media

As

 

In 638 Sophronius, the Patriarch of Jerusalem, peacefully surrendered the city and the welfare of the Christian community to the Second Caliph Omar bin Al- Khattab in person. In an age when conquest was often characterised by intolerance and violence towards a conquered community, the terms of surrender of Jerusalem, which is known as the Pact of Omar, were generous and humane:

In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful.

This is what the servant of God, Omar bin Al-Khattab, the Commander of the Faithful, has offered the people of Jerusalem: their security, granting them protection for their selves, their money, their churches, their children, their lowly and their innocent, and the remainder of their people. Their churches are not to be taken, nor are they to be destroyed, nor are they to be degraded or belittled, neither are their crosses or their money, and they are not to be forced to change their religion, nor is any one of them to be harmed.

We can’t miss that he is a Savior. Within a few years the Muslims had also conquered parts of Egypt to the South and Asia Minor and Armenia to the North. 

But is he an Antichrist?

Continue reading “155) Tracking The King Of The South From Seljuk Turks To The Ottoman Empire”

156) Tracking The King Of The South Into Modern Times

The Ottoman Empire succumbed to what most historians describe as a long, slow decline…only between 5 and 10 percent of its inhabitants could read… the empire had a shortage of well-trained military officers, engineers, clerks, doctors and other professions.

Allied with Germany in WWI, in the end the Ottoman empire lost nearly a half a million soldiers, most of them to disease, plus about 3.8 million more who were injured or became ill. In

“the king of the south shall be stirred up to battle with a very great and mighty army; but he shall not stand: for they…that feed of the portion of his meat [i.e. his highest ranking government officials] shall destroy him.” (Daniel 11:25-26)

During WWI an Ottoman military officer rose to power by thwarting the Allied invasion of the Dardanelles and subsequently negotiating independence for a newly formed state of Turkey after the European powers divided up the shattered Ottoman Empire. The last Ottoman Sultan was deposed in 1909 by the revolutionary group calling themselves The Young Turks. Their leader took the name Ata-Turk / Father of the Turks – think Ab-rahim / Father of Many Nations – as the first president of the modern Republic of Turkey. Over the next two decades, Atatürk created a modern state that would grow under his successors.

The establishment of the modern Republic of Turkey marked the formal end of the Ottoman Empire and the beginning of a new secular, national state led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk who won the Turkish War of Independence (1919–1922).

Given its crucial geographical position straddling East and West, and political connections remaining from its 1,000 year old empire status, the United States promptly established diplomatic relations with the new Republic of Turkey in 

To curry favor with their new ally, the U.S. and other European nations kept their navy ships at sea while the Moslem Turks asserted themselves by massacring 300,000 Christian inhabitants of Smyrna by sword and fire.

As Trifkovic observes… “The moral disarmament of contemporary post-Christian Europe is now nearly universal.”

Continue reading “156) Tracking The King Of The South Into Modern Times”

157) Tracking The King Of The North Into Modern Times

800 – Charlemagne, king of the Franks / French, in reward and attendance by the Pope at Rome, crowned himself Roman Emperor after he restored the Western Roman Empire’s control over borderlands lost to invading Norsemen.  To extend his sway, he made himself protector of the Christian establishment in Jerusalem, establishing diplomatic ties with the Islamic Abbasid caliph in Baghdad against their common enemies, the Christian emperors in Eastern Europe and the Islamic Umayyad caliphs in Spain. Charlemagne served as a source of inspiration for Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) and Adolf Hitler (1889-1945).

900 – Simeon I of Bulgaria entitled himself Caesar / Tsar of the Bulgarians after turning Bulgaria into the most powerful state in contemporary Eastern and Southeast Europe, deemed its Golden Age. This title was passed down to subsequent Bulgarian heads of state until the monarchy was abolished in 1946. During the inevitable battles for domination the Byzantines, Magyars and Serbs citizens in the Greek-controlled side of the Roman Empire, while called by later Latins the ‘Byzantine Empire’, continued to refer to themselves as Roman citizens and to their empire as the Roman Empire or Romania. 

962 – Otto I was crowned Römisch-Deutscher Kaiser / Caesar.

1157 – German Frederick I Barbarossa added the word “Holy” to his “Roman Empire”, in response to the Great Schism of 1054 between Greek Constantinople and Latin Rome that created the Roman Catholic Church vs the Greek Orthodox Church,  reflecting his jostling for power as one of the two “co-regents” to become the “first among equals” in the Principate.

1453 – Ivan III, the Grand Prince of Moscow, became the only Orthodox monarch in the world when the Ottoman Turks conquered first, Constantinople, then the Balkans, leaving Moscow as the ‘third Rome’. His claim was strengthened in 1472 when he married the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, Zoe, then Sophia, Palaiologina.

Continue reading “157) Tracking The King Of The North Into Modern Times”

SECTION XXX: By Every Word Of The LORD Doth Man Live

“All the commandments which I [Moses] command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the LORD sware unto your fathers…that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.” (Deuteronomy 8:1-3, Matthew 4:4)

The divine authorship, therefore authority, of the word of God was achieved through God uniting his Spirit with a series of human writers. Since all of them were tapped into the same uniquely noncompetitive God, no God-authorized prophet contradicts, corrects, or cancels any previous writer. This consistency provides the means by which all holy scripture, including pre-Mosaic texts such as the books of Enoch and Jasher, can be deemed reliable history.

“Hearken unto me…I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I.” (Isaiah 48:12-16)

The record of judgments on code violations prove that the laws “Thou shalt perform proper sacrifices“, Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not commit adultery, etc.” were disseminated from day 1 to Abel,  Job, the Hebrews such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jethro the priest of Midian, long before Moses appeared ~1500 BC.

We are not caving in to the claims of secular Higher Criticism by recognizing God’s standard practices and patterns of behavior of relying on the written word for his history of mankind in Genesis, and organization of religious practices in Exodus Deuteronomy under Moses, who did NOT establish a brand new religion, but RE-established the UNIVERSAL worship of YHVH.

Libraries in the ancient world were the centers of knowledge and learning that universities are today, specifically archiving past civilizations’ knowledge of construction, mathematics, astronomy and astrology and sacred writings on which emerging empires founded themselves. The famous Library of Nineveh, created by Ashurbanipal of the Assyrian Empire in the mid 600’s BC with the objective of gathering all the knowledge of his time from throughout  ancient Mesopotamia and established Nineveh as a crucial center of learning in the ancient world.

Libraries were established as early as 2600 BC in in Egypt. The statement that “Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians” is directly linked with “and it came into his heart to visit his brethren the children of Israel” (Acts 7:22-23) as through his studies in that library he would have encountered his heritage of birth.

Continue reading “SECTION XXX: By Every Word Of The LORD Doth Man Live”

158) God’s Covenants Are Eternal = They Change Not!

There is a tremendous amount of debate and confusion over the matters of Eschatology, that is, the Study of the End of Times. Two of the most prevalent school of thoughts are Covenant Theology and Dispensational Eschatology.

Covenant Theology claims that God deals with mankind through several Covenants. Most Covenant Theology theologians hold to a Covenant of Works in the Old Testament between God and Adam. The New Testament is the Covenant of Grace.

Dispensationalism is a method of biblical interpretation that teaches that Scripture is “unfolding” in a series of Dispensations beginning with Adam, changing with Noah, and so on as history progresses. Dispensationalists claim support for their interpretation through “literal” interpretation of scripture, but a literal interpretation of scripture contradicts this claim.

The Covenant of Dominion:

“God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began…Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion…the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.“” (Titus 1:2, Genesis 1:26, Genesis 9:16)

This covenant has never been replaced. It requires mankind to be in God’s image and likeness in order to be a partner, and over and over God had to single-handedly uphold this covenant, and make modifications to squeeze some men into qualifying for their side of the deal.

Continue reading “158) God’s Covenants Are Eternal = They Change Not!”

159) Breaking God’s Covenant Doesn’t End It

“In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.” (Judges 17:6)

This same situation prevailed again in the days of Jeremiah when the king and much of the ruling class was taken into captivity, the temple at Jerusalem was destroyed preventing the supervised practice of the Mosaic Law detailing regularly schedule sacrifices and rituals. 

Self-propelled teachers / rabbis sprang up throughout the diaspora, developing new interpretations of the Jewish laws and customs, new traditions collected in the Mishnah and Talmud, transforming biblical Judaism into the doctrine of the Pharisees which is so condemned in scripture.

This was battled by Zerub-babel and Nehemiah.

“And all Israel in the days of Zerubbabel, and in the days of Nehemiah… sanctified holy things unto the Levites; and the Levites sanctified them unto the children of Aaron… Thus cleansed I [Nehemiah] them from all strangers, and appointed the wards of the priests and the Levites, every one in his business;” (Nehemiah 12, 13:30)

However, even after a remnant returned from Babylon, rebuilt the temple, and re-established the Levitical rites, the false teachers with their easy-believism continued to corrupt Mosaic law

In this context, God’s announcement that “they shall teach no more every man…saying, Know the LORD” (Jeremiah 31:34) is a reprimand on the inevitable corruption of knowledge, understanding and wisdom among the crowd of false teachers, sects, and departures from the faith.

Continue reading “159) Breaking God’s Covenant Doesn’t End It”

160) The New Covenant Is The Old Story

A covenant remains intact even if one of the parties breaches it.

It is the responsibility of the stronger party to make up for any failure on the part of the weaker party.

Therefore, every reference to a “new” covenant is an addition to the original covenant by the stronger party for the purpose of upholding the original covenant. 

God’s foundational covenant with humanity is the transfer of his power and authority to humanity.

“Let us make man in our image and let them have dominion”. (Genesis 1:26)

This is the Singularity enforcing a new reality, exactly as stated in “Let…” throughout Creation and thereafter and the only way this can possibly work is for humanity to draw on the source of power and authority of the Singularity over Creation.

When “the LORD God commanded the man / made a law, saying…of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” (Genesis 2:16-17) this was not some arbitrary rule. This is informing the man of simple reality. Mankind does not have infinite resources to life outside of God. Breaking away to independent determination of what is good and evil instead of following God’s determination of what is good and what is evil is becoming separated from the Source of life, i.e. death.

From a physics perspective, having more than one “opinion / truth / reality / plan of action” changes Order to Chaos, entropy into enthalpy, resulting in sooner or later in deterioration and destruction. This is evident in the partisan rancor in America in 2026, as “social polarization between distinct groups in America has reached alarming levels, deepening divides along lines of race, ethnicity, religion, ideology, and socioeconomic status”, and across the world. The results are so inevitable that non-biblical predictions of state conflict outcomes based on human nature are consistent with biblical prophecy.

But it is simply human nature to take charge ourselves. This totally makes sense when we recognize that’s how God designed us – to have dominion. So it comes as no surprise that they ate the fruit.

And from that beginning of time the Creator has supported humanity’s failure to meet its covenantal responsibilities to take dominion.

Creator God added a clause to the original covenant – transferring death “in the day” the Adams sinned to animals under their charge.

“Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God [kill animals to] make coats of skins…” (Genesis 3:8-10, 21)

“For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls…” (Leviticus 17:11)

The exchange of life for life should come as a logical observation, not as a spiritual mandate. We know that humans must sacrifice another life in order to maintain human life. Having our meat cut up into unrecognizable shapes and wrapped in plastic allows us to overlook that fact, but it’s still a fact nonetheless, even for vegetarians who end vegetable life when they harvest it.

Continue reading “160) The New Covenant Is The Old Story”

SECTION XXXI: A Man Of God Like Moses

Moses “the man / ish / identical one of God” had as much an exclusive relationship with God as Adam made in the image and likeness of God, consistent with God’s identification of himself with, by transfer of authority to, Adam and his Melchizedekian successors.

“I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee / Moses, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.” (Deuteronomy 18:15-19)

What Moses taught in word and deed in the Old Testament is absolutely fundamental to understanding YHVH’s Savior in the New Testament.

Jesus Christ validated all his claims, including the impact of his death and resurrection, through Moses’ writings.

“Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people…the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel…Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken…And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.” (Luke 24:15-27)

Jesus Christ repeated the same instructions that Moses laid down on how to avoid righteous God’s judgment on sin.

“I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil; In that I command thee this day to love the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments, that thou mayest live.” (Deuteronomy 30:11-16)

“a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live…Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till ALL be fulfilled.” (Luke 10:25-28)

“I can of mine own self do nothing…I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me. If I bear witness of myself, my witness [by itself] is not true. There is another that beareth witness of me...

God names His own policies and procedures “the law of Moses.“

Continue reading “SECTION XXXI: A Man Of God Like Moses”

161) The Son / Replica Of Warrior King David

“Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.” (Matthew 10:34)

One of the most significant issues Jesus and his followers were dealing with is that the praiseworthy revolt by the priests against the false king Antiochus Epiphenes had turned into a coup d’etat against the true priest-king / Melchizedek.

“The LORD hath sworn in truth unto David; he will not turn from it;

  1. Of the fruit of thy body will I set upon thy throne…
  2. I will also clothe her priests with salvation:
  3. and her saints shall shout aloud for joy.” (Psalm 132:8-18)

So “While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he?” he is exposing their anti-sacral kingship stance. And sure enough, they give a legally passable answer but avoid the spiritual when “They [sulkily] say unto him, The son of David.” “He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord?

Continue reading “161) The Son / Replica Of Warrior King David”