31) The Human Genome Project Debunks Evolution

Leave a comment

2000px-dna_chemical_structure.svg_In 1944 DNA was identified as the structure of inheritance. As complex as that process is, it was determined to consist of just four different molecules. And then these four always combine in the same two base pairs – C with G and A with T.

Compare this to digital computers which perform calculations using the simplest binary code of 0-1.

As with computers, the two DNA base pairs can be lined up in an infinite variety of sequences and lengths to form genes. All living things are distinguished by the number and arrangements of the same two base pairs of molecules.

It took the advent of highly functioning computers in the 1990’s to unravel and catalogue the complete sequence of human DNA in The Human Genome Project.

Continue reading “31) The Human Genome Project Debunks Evolution”

2000px-dna_chemical_structure.svg_In 1944 DNA was identified as the structure of inheritance. As complex as that process is, it was determined to consist of just four different molecules. And then these four always combine in the same two base pairs – C with G and A with T.

Compare this to digital computers which perform calculations using the simplest binary code of 0-1.

As with computers, the two DNA base pairs can be lined up in an infinite variety of sequences and lengths to form genes. All living things are distinguished by the number and arrangements of the same two base pairs of molecules.

It took the advent of highly functioning computers in the 1990’s to unravel and catalogue the complete sequence of human DNA in The Human Genome Project.

Continue reading “31) The Human Genome Project Debunks Evolution”

32) The Genetic Mutation Factors Study Debunks Evolution

Leave a comment

The FACT is that science acknowledges what the Bible documents, that one mother and one father parented all human beings alive today. As detailed in the previous post, Eve has been tracked through mitochondrial DNA passed down the generations only in the mother’s egg cell. Adam has been tracked through the male-only Y chromosome on which geneticists have isolated distinct human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroups / differences due to mutations.

According to extensive DNA-sequencing analysis of the Y chromosome, “Every time human DNA is passed from one generation to the next it accumulates 100–200 new mutations.”

Typically, a newborn is expected to have 70 new mutations in its genome, but just one of these proteins “can introduce potentially thousands [more mutations]” in one generation.

However, by arbitrarily applying a low calculation that the human Y-chromosome accumulates only 1-2 mutations per generation, Adam is estimated to have lived roughly 236,000 years ago.

When we apply the scientifically known factor of 100-200 mutations per generation, we arrive at the calculation of only 2,000 -4,000 years since the Most Common Ancestor. This is consistent with the biblical account of the creation of mankind in 4,000 BC and Noah having inherited Adam’s unmutated DNA about 2350 BC.

The mutations found in world-wide male Y-chromosomes have been categorized into “haplo-groups” of mutations unique to – never shared by – each haplogroup, labeled groups A-T.

Can we not recognize the entrenched bias in Evolution ignoring all scientific research fundamentals?

The equally entrenched racism by the elites inventing Evolution at the time colonial Europeans were cruelly enslaving non-whites is also flagrantly exhibited in the study’s use of apes to date the stages of human evolution from non-whites to whites.

The ancestral state of a Y-SNP marker is usually determined by comparison to a chimpanzee DNA sequence for the same marker (Underhill et al. 2000).

33) The Missing Link From Past To Present

Leave a comment

Missing link term is frequently used now, mostly by journalists and in popular literature. Specialists understand perfectly that formation of Homo sapience species is a long process, and as evolution is continuous, it is obvious that there were MANY SPECIES between a modern human and our ancestral ape living about 10 mya. These species were slowly, one by one, discovered by anthropologists for the last 100 years. As a result we see not just a link, but a chain of intermediate species.

  1. This insults the reader’s intelligence. “A specialist would understand perfectly…” A child can understand how the lack of connecting pieces between the parts renders the entirety nonfunctional.
  2. This is cultic, requiring the reader to accept the word of the “authority” without question.
  3. This is Newspeak, avoiding the very real issue of the failure of anthropology to discover the stages of change between species by replacing that fundamental claim of Evolution with an unquestionable but irrelevant scientific knowledge of the existence of similar species.
  4. There is no evidence that these extinct species represent a chain of development from one to another.

And to stop beating a dead horse, I will end by pointing out the gross deception of “we see not just a link, but a chain,” stated with the same flourish of a magician’s misdirection.

Continue reading “33) The Missing Link From Past To Present”

34) What Darwin Got Right

Leave a comment

Jerry Fodor, the American philosopher [and writer of] What Darwin Got Wrong, the new book he has co-authored with the cognitive scientist Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini.

He hadn’t just identified evidence that natural selection was more complicated than previously thought…Natural selection, he explains, simply “cannot be the primary engine of evolution”.

The irony in all this is that Darwin himself never claimed that it was. He went to his deathbed protesting that he’d been misinterpreted: there was no reason, he said, to assume that natural selection was the only imaginable mechanism of evolution.

But rejection of an intelligent designer Creator was and remains a pillar of the concept, so the only other mechanism of evolution is survival of the fittest through intentional measures.

The Darwins; a Bright Family With a Dark Side

Continue reading “34) What Darwin Got Right”

SECTION VI: The Golden Age Is Perfect Unity Between Father And Sons

Leave a comment

Hesiod, who translated the older civilizations’ accounts of the origins of the gods / Theo-gony into the Greek culture’s version also converted the ancient Babylonian Ages of Man – historical stages of human existence– to fit Greek culture. Like Nebuchadnezzar’s statue, these are indicated symbolically with metals of successively decreasing value as the Golden Age of Man characterized by peace and harmony when the humans freely associated with the gods and, like them, did not have to work to feed themselves. These conditions parallel the biblical account of the first humans’ way of life in the Garden of Eden, including conversing with the serpent as a normal part of a walk in the park.

One aspect of the unity between God and both branches of his offspring that is most unfortunately missed by mainstream Christianity is the expression of gender duality.

While it is assumed from the statement “male and female created he them” that God created one of the humans with male reproductive organs and the other with female reproductive organs, that assumption doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

“For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:” (Colossians 2:9-10)

Scientifically, chimerism is a natural condition of a single individual being both male and female.

As shown in the very ancient Hindu depiction of Shiva, a primary god, this is a key aspect not only of Father God but his spirit sons. If we don’t acknowledge this, we miss a key manifestation of spirit beings interacting with humans.

Continue reading “SECTION VI: The Golden Age Is Perfect Unity Between Father And Sons”

35) Second Sons

1 Comment

Since the cloned of the Creator were already in existence when “God / Elohim (plural noun) said, Let us make man in our / bə·ṣal·mê·nūplural image” (Genesis 1:26) one interpretation that in this context “Elohim” means “gods of power”, i.e. that the sons of God were participants in God’s process of creation.

However, in the following verse we find “So God created / singular verb בָּרָא bārāʾ, meaning “He created” as is always used elsewhere in all the acts of creation featured in Genesis by the God of All Powers. This shows us that the actual creation of man (and everything else) in Genesis was a singular act by God alone, confirmed by the next phrase “in his own / bə·ṣal·mōw singular image, in the image of God created He / singular created him”, as well as his express statement that does not share the act of creation with anyone else.

Moreover, these second sons are despised by many of the cloned gods.

If, like me and a multitude of others, you’re a Game Of Thrones fan you’ll understand instantly the reference to “Second Sons” as those in the family hierarchical order who have far less estate and value than the first born sons. We get that Tyrion Lannister is despised because he will never measure up (ha ha) to his older brother’s physical and social exceptionalism, Jon Snow is rejected due to resentment by the mother, and illegitimate Ramsay Bolton’s legitimate younger brother is murdered so illegitimate Ramsay can inherit their father’s estate. 

“a thing was secretly brought to me…a spirit passed before my face; the hair of my flesh stood up…and I heard a voice, saying…God put no trust in his servants…angels…How much less in them that dwell in houses of clay?…they die!” (Job 4)

This is not only an observation, it’s a plan to eliminate the competition.

But here’s where the partial clones of the Almighty show how they fall short of their Creator.

“my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD…For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts…my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.” (Isaiah 55:8-11)

The paradoxical new and improved sons of God lies in the very fact that we die.

“What is man that thou art mindful of him? and the son of [hu]man / ha-Adam [all mortals], that thou visitest him [in the sense of being a relative whose houses always have open doors to each other]? (Psalm 8)”

“Thou madest him a little lower than the angels…for the suffering of death” (Hebrews 2)

Continue reading “35) Second Sons”

Since the cloned of the Creator were already in existence when “God / Elohim (plural noun) said, Let us make man in our / bə·ṣal·mê·nūplural image” (Genesis 1:26) one interpretation that in this context “Elohim” means “gods of power”, i.e. that the sons of God were participants in God’s process of creation.

However, in the following verse we find “So God created / singular verb בָּרָא bārāʾ, meaning “He created” as is always used elsewhere in all the acts of creation featured in Genesis by the God of All Powers. This shows us that the actual creation of man (and everything else) in Genesis was a singular act by God alone, confirmed by the next phrase “in his own / bə·ṣal·mōw singular image, in the image of God created He / singular created him”, as well as his express statement that does not share the act of creation with anyone else.

Moreover, these second sons are despised by many of the cloned gods.

If, like me and a multitude of others, you’re a Game Of Thrones fan you’ll understand instantly the reference to “Second Sons” as those in the family hierarchical order who have far less estate and value than the first born sons. We get that Tyrion Lannister is despised because he will never measure up (ha ha) to his older brother’s physical and social exceptionalism, Jon Snow is rejected due to resentment by the mother, and illegitimate Ramsay Bolton’s legitimate younger brother is murdered so illegitimate Ramsay can inherit their father’s estate. 

“a thing was secretly brought to me…a spirit passed before my face; the hair of my flesh stood up…and I heard a voice, saying…God put no trust in his servants…angels…How much less in them that dwell in houses of clay?…they die!” (Job 4)

This is not only an observation, it’s a plan to eliminate the competition.

But here’s where the partial clones of the Almighty show how they fall short of their Creator.

“my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD…For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts…my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.” (Isaiah 55:8-11)

The paradoxical new and improved sons of God lies in the very fact that we die.

“What is man that thou art mindful of him? and the son of [hu]man / ha-Adam [all mortals], that thou visitest him [in the sense of being a relative whose houses always have open doors to each other]? (Psalm 8)”

“Thou madest him a little lower than the angels…for the suffering of death” (Hebrews 2)

Continue reading “35) Second Sons”

36) Begotten Son = Heir To Father’s Estate

Leave a comment

Primo-geniture/ first-born is the most common practice in the Western world, but ancient societies valued proven competence over birth order. for obvious survival reasons. An extension of the Father’s base-line authority, he also chose the son who became the new head of the family when he ceded his authority.

The Godfather saga is a case study of the concept of granting inheritance to the son who best manifests the father’s likeness by demonstrating commitment to the values of the father. Out of Vito Corleone’s sons, the older two go their own ways, both out of pride – the oldest out of arrogance and the second son out of resentment. Only Michael, the youngest, inherits the father’s dominion, because he carries out his father’s will.

Michael in turn publicly names his nephew Vincent as his heir, because Vincent has become  just like him because he has submitted himself to the punishing training required to make him capable of carrying on Michael’s legacy. 

The ancient term for designating a child one’s heir is “begat”.

“This is the book of the generations of Adam…Adam begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth…And after he had begotten Seth…he begat sons and daughters.” (Genesis 5:3-5)

In any inheritance there are two elements to one’s estate – material assets and authority to manage them. 

Continue reading “36) Begotten Son = Heir To Father’s Estate”

37) “Only” Begotten = “Unique” Among Other Heirs

Leave a comment

This concept is well portrayed in Breaking Bad.

Jesse’s character development into Mr. White’s likeness is encapsulated in a brusque comment made by Mr. White on a test paper that Jesse perceived as Mr. Whites’ recognition and empowering of his parents’ overlooked ability, so kept among his few belongings – “Apply yourself!”

Despite being in constant emotional conflict this authority figure, he respects him as evidenced by always addressing him as “Mr. White” and modeling his own behavior after his.

sony-breaking-bad-1-1.jpg

Not only does he become the heir to Mr. White’s drug empire, as Jesse matures we hear Jesse repeat Mr. White’s instructions, including the all-important “Apply yourself!” to his own subordinates, and they begin to model their behavior after his.

And without giving away any of the building drama, the “only” begotten heir multiplies himself into “many brethren”.

“Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob…Jacob begat Judas and his brethren.” (Matthew 1:2)

38) The Covenant Of Dominion

Leave a comment

Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant is a 2023 American action drama film. John Kinley, a U.S. Army Green Beret Master Sergeant and Ahmed, his Afghan interpreter, are the only survivors of their unit after it was ambushed by the Taliban. In an unspoken covenant to “have each other’s back” when it was just the two of them fighting their way through enemy territory, after suffering severe wounds during a hazardous trek through enemy-held mountains, John only survives through Ahmed’s selfless actions.

A covenant contrasts with a contract, which is based on mutual responsibility and wiggle room “if this then that” transactions. A covenant remains fully intact for each party regardless of either party’s 1) ability to participate, or 2) breaking any part of it. 

As in the agreement between Ahmed and John, the word “covenant” does not have to be in writing in Genesis chapter 1 any more than all the other aspects of reality in order for it to be there.

We find every element of a covenant proving that this is one of the new realities called into being through “Let be…” throughout Creation and thereafter when the Singularity e=mc2, God of his own volition, without consulting the other party in this fiat, said:

Continue reading “38) The Covenant Of Dominion”