Kingdom Come

Mark Twain said that the only difference between reality and fiction is that fiction needs to be credible.

So does H. P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos’ incredibility make it reality?

Lovecraft drew his Cthulhu from the Sumerian religion, frankly calling Cthulhu “Father Dagon”, the fish-god who lives in the sea who presides over the Deep Ones. There is no reason not to accept the Sumerian account that they are the same gods described in the Bible.

Reptilians (also called reptoids,^[1] archons,^[2] reptiloids, saurians, draconians,^[3][4][5] or lizard people^[6]) are supposed reptilian humanoids, which play a prominent role in fantasy, science fiction, ufology, and conspiracy theories.

If you want to learn everything there is to know about the reptilians, David Icke is your go-to guy. David Icke first began talking about the reptilians in The Biggest Secret in 1999. It is Icke’s belief that the Annunaki gods of Babylonian lore still walk among us today as shapeshifters while inhabiting the Fourth Dimension overlaying humanity’s three dimensional world. This is actually consistent with the biblical definition of hyperdimensional “sons of God” with c2 ability to convert energy to mass and back again.

Others who have similar beliefs include Erich von Däniken, who wrote Chariots of the Gods in 1968, and Zecharia Sitchin, who penned Divine Encounters in 1995.

This is all consistent with the biblical account of good and evil spirit entities which can cross over into our world, often through the practice of summoning entities, most of which will try to strike bargains. 

The leader of the Reptilians in the chaos / sea of outer space is, of course, Lucifer.

Continue reading “SECTION VII: The Reptilians”

“O Lucifer / Bringer of light, son of the morning…

What light is that? What morning is that? What else but when the Singularity first expressed itself in the light spectrum in Creation, “when I laid the foundations of the earth…When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy…” (Job 38:4-7)

“Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty…every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold.” (Isaiah 14:12; Ezekiel 28:12-14)

Lucifer is described not just by gold – the yellow sun we see through the earth’s atmosphere – but light refracted into its entire spectrum. We can understand this as a poetic expression of Lucifer containing the entire spectrum of immense light energy as well.

This portrayal of Lucifer’s tremendous power is confirmed by comparing his to that of the Singularity God himself.

“…behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.” (Revelation 4:2-3)

The reference to “like” an emerald is not to this gem’s color, but to its refraction.

Emeralds exhibit double refraction, meaning they refract light in two different patterns. This often causes the Emerald to exhibit two different distinct color patterns.

This could surely be seen as a reflection of the unified Father and the Son together on the throne.

Lucifer was flying high. He was as close to the image of God as any created being could be. Without a doubt he expected to God’s partner, to be put in charge of creation.

But no.

“Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife…Having the glory of God…garnished with all manner of precious stones…jasper, sapphire, chalcedony, emerald, sardonyx, sardius, chrysolyte, beryl, topaz, chrysoprasus, jacinth, amethyst, pearls.” (Revelation 21:9-24)

Continue reading “40) Lucifer Is Humanity’s Implacable Adversary”

If we are ever going to understand how the massive amount of information, documented and preserved over thousands of years by multiple authors in a variety of cultures applies to us in our culture, we must understand basic literature construction.

Theme refers to the central, deeper meaning of a written work.

Writers typically will not directly state the theme, but tease the reader to perceive and interpret it. The reason every high school English teacher struggles to pull this skill out of their students is that the process of reflecting on the theme not only leads the reader to develop a greater understanding of the work itself, but a means of grasping a better sense of the world.

Themes are recognizable by the repetition of key ideas and forces driving the plot forward from its beginning to the climax and conclusion. 

“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was / became formless and void, and darkness…And God divided the light from the darkness.” (Genesis 1:1-2)

“That which was from the beginning…is the message which we…declare unto you, that God is light / life, and in him is no darkness / destruction at all.” (John 1, I John 1).

“In the beginning” defines the start of time, which is scientifically determined to flow only into the future by the Second Law of Thermodynamics as the inevitable natural increase in disorder when no additional energy is added to a closed system.

“The law that entropy always increases holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature.”

Detractors of God’s handiwork like to claim a past tense to the word “was”, in other words, that God created a formless and void universe, allowing deep time for evolution.

This interpretation does not hold up under scrutiny. “Was” is used to denote a change in state.

“he drank of the wine [prior to being drunk], and was / came to be drunken; and he was / came to be uncovered” (Genesis 9:21)

“Esau came from the field [where while hunting with strength], and he was / came to be faint” (Genesis 25:29)

The theme of the Bible is stated in the very first sentences as “the establishment of the kingdom of God” against opposition.

Continue reading “41) “In The Beginning” Strikes A Death Knell”

• “Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God…in the day that thou wast created…
  • “when I laid the foundations of the earth…the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy
• till iniquity was found in thee…
  • Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth…And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors, And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?
• therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee…I will cast thee to the ground.”
  • Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to know his place?” (Ezekiel 28:13-17, Job 38:4-12)

We can recognize the Adversary’s identification of himself in his rewrite, Hesiod’s Theo-gony, i.e. gods’ origins, the Greek version of the original Sumerian account. A significant difference in the Greek version – fundamental to its influence on the Renaissance and contemporary science – is its emphasis on materialism, which posits that everything in the Universe, including consciousness, is a product of matter.

• In the beginning there was only Chaos –
  • the pagan version, naturally, begins with Genesis 1:2, the destruction of YHVH’s creation expressing Lucifer’s outrage at being told it does not belong to him.
• But then Gaia, the Earth, morphed into being, the ever-sure foundations of all the deathless ones / immortals who hold 1) the peaks of snowy Olympus, and 2) dim Tartarus in the depth of the wide-pathed Earth,
  • On Day 2 after YHVH clears away the waters / chaos from earth. Lucifer reframes his rebellion from destruction to ownership / self identification [think Trump Tower], while confirming the existence of hell in the center of the earth.
• Earth’s first child was Ouranos / Uranus [recognizable from the Sumerian Anu and Hebrew Ani], reframed by the materialistic Greeks from YHVH to starry Heaven. Then she gave birth to the barren, raging Sea without any sexual love.
  • In the pagan version, Gaia as the only materialized being has no-one to couple with, logically forcing the acknowledgement of Creation via e=mc2 AKA c2=e/m, as stated in Genesis 1:1 and confirmed by scientific revelations. Interestingly, parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction among certain amphibians whose eggs develop without fertilization – including the Komodo dragons, the behemoths of the reptile world as clones. The problem is that since only the Singularity – by definition – has infinite c2 force to replace what was split off in creation, this form of reproduction has limits. Atlas, one of the Titans, gave up much of his power to many children – the Hesperides, the Hyades, and the Pleiades. Once depleted of kinetic energy he was left to hold up the sky with what was left of his residual potential energy.
• But later [upon realizing this limitation] Gaia slept with a partner / other hyperdimensional being(s) and bore multiple types of earth-like creatures, specifically designed, unlike the brute forces of nature, to personally destroy the humans in this War of the Worlds:
  • We see this in a biological parallel as well. A klepton is a species that like “klepto-maniac”, steals from another species’ resources in order to reproduce.  Again, this is a common feature of certain reptiles.

Continue reading “42) The Clone Wars”

It could be said that the Titanomachy was inevitable. Cronus had rebelled against his father, Uranus, cutting off his testicles with a scythe. Uranus cursed his son Cronus, telling him that one day his own children would also rebel, and win against him.

When we view this account through a biblical lens, we see a twisted version of the truth.

The gods are the hyperdimensional spirit beings commonly called angels. This term refers to their ability to convert some of their energy to mass to manifest on earth, due to having been cloned from, i.e. having some of the c2 force required as per e=mc2.

Cronus / Time points the big hand at Lucifer, who began the stopwatch ticking when he brought entropy / chaos / time to the originally stable creation. He rebelled against his father / authority and creator (Ur)-Ani -(s) and is credited with “cutting off the creator’s testicles”. Exactly as is done with neutering male animals, this symbolizes eliminating his potency / power, domination within territory, and ability to procreate a lineage.

This corresponds biblically to the “cutting off” of YHVH’s dominus, Adam from his delegated dominion over the earth, as well as his hyperdimensional unity with God after he degraded to mortal.

But written into YHVH’s covenant of dominion with ha-Adam / the human was the opportunity to regain a relationship with the Singularity Source of Life.

Continue reading “43) The Clash Of The Titans”

If we base our interpretation of a creation “day” on a biblical model rather than our assumptions, we find that the creation “day” is not a spacetime quantity.  It is a quality. Right in the passage “day” is defined as a state of being of light, 

“And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.” (Genesis 1:5)\

The creation day is characterized by a condition when God is in control and personally active as the light of the world, which like the sun, energizes all life.

“the works of God should be made manifest…I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” (John 9:3-5)

The darkness / night is characterized not only by the absence of God’s presence and creative activity but active opposition to God’s work by destruction.

“God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with him [are in his presence involved in his activities], and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth.” (I John 1:5-6)

The Hindu religion has maintained ancient records out of which we can pull a more accurate spiritual perspective about the difference between mortal and immortal, time and eternal, as opposed to Western civilization’s materialistic frame of reference. According to them, the gods were immortal…subject to a different time frame and had their own periods of activity and rest. These constituted their days and nights.

The universe is thought to regenerate in cycles…Shiva destroys the universe at the end of each cycle.

When the highest Supreme Self was awake, they believed, He would expand outwardly and manifest his objective worlds…

Continue reading “44) Days Of Thunder”

Evening – Beginning of Day 2

The Firmament

There has been considerable debate over the translation of Gen1:1.

“In the beginning God created / bara the heaven and the earth.”

Much literature is intentionally ambiguous at its beginning, especially about a mystery, in order to draw the reader into the narrative. The Bible is no different. The first chapters are either a gold mine for someone seeking to find the Creator God of the Bible, or a minefield for anyone looking to deny him.

• “I am the first / creation
  • I also am the last / destruction…
• I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I…
  • Thus saith the LORD…There is no peace, saith the LORD, unto the wicked.” (Isaiah 48:12-22)

“And the earth was / came to be without form, and void; and darkness / works of evil was upon the face of the deep / abyss, formlessness, chaos.” (Genesis 1:2)

Continue reading “46) The Firmament Shields The Earth From Destruction”

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!…Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.” (Isaiah 14:12-15)

A planet in the shape of a type of oblate spheroid, a toroid, informally called a donut because it has a hole in the middle, is possible. “However, there is no firm theoretical understanding as to how toroidal planets could form naturally.”

This explanation is obviously denying Creation, but covering up scientific evidence as well.

“Since the work of Safronov (1972), planet formation has been understood to be a bottom-up process whose initial phases…[are] disks.” That’s another word for “spheroid”, of which a toroid is one type.

“The idea of a toroidal Earth was first mooted in 2008, in a post on the messageboards of the Flat Earth Society. That in itself should have been enough to tell people that it wasn’t a serious suggestion.”

Ahh, using mockery as a weapon when the so-called intelligentsia have no facts. 

In fact, even when they do, many sources continue to frankly deceive the general public. 

Published 2025 after it was publically admitted that the earth is a flatted spheroid: From the offset, we need to state that no, of course Earth isn’t donut-shaped. That can be proved in all manner of ways [name three], but the best and most obvious evidence is pictures of Earth taken from space, and it is patently, undeniably round, as this image captured during the Apollo 17 mission clearly shows. Credit: NASA

[Hastily backtracking] Of course, Earth isn’t entirely round. It’s not a sphere, it’s an oblate spheroid – a sphere that’s been flattened slightly at the top and bottom.

Seriously? Using false evidence to prove a point, then admitting it’s false without acknowledging that if earth is in fact an oblate spheroid it could be a type that is also a toroid with a narrow, perhaps invisible, hole..

Various astronomers both amateur and professional have, in fact, spent a great deal of time and mental energy proving that such a planet is feasible.

Continue reading “SECTION VIII: The Abyss At The Center Of The Earth”