SECTION IV: The Reality Option

From Forbes Magazine:

Scientific Proof Is A Myth

You’ve heard of our greatest scientific theories: the theory of evolution, the Big Bang theory, the theory of gravity. You’ve also heard of the concept of a proof, and the claims that certain pieces of evidence prove the validities of these theories. Fossils, genetic inheritance, and DNA prove the theory of evolution. The Hubble expansion of the Universe, the evolution of stars, galaxies, and heavy elements, and the existence of the cosmic microwave background prove the Big Bang theory. And falling objects, GPS clocks, planetary motion, and the deflection of starlight prove the theory of gravity.

Except that’s a complete lie...when it comes to science, proving anything is an impossibility.

Continue reading “SECTION IV: The Reality Option”

23) Scientific Constants Validate A Creator

Science requires a belief that there are constants of nature – invariable, unchanging conditions and measurements – used in scientific investigation, without which its models, theories, predictions fundamental to its laws of physic  are meaningless.

One of the simplest but most powerful laws of physics is E = mc2. As Einstein himself put it: “mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing.”

This is called, logically, the Theory of Relativity.

No conversion from energy to mass or mass to energy can happen anywhere in the universe until acted upon by a Force.

Continue reading “23) Scientific Constants Validate A Creator”

24) Quantum Physics Validates A Creator-Sustainer

There’s a lot we don’t know about our universe — in fact, 95% of it remains a mystery to us. 

In my following simplified explanation of what the world’s greatest geniuses are still investigating I don’t claim to be completely accurate, only to give an idea of some of what is being explored in Physics –  the science that deals with the structure of matter, the nature of energy, and the forces controlling them. 

To be “quantized” means to be consistently measurable.

“A quantum (plural: quanta) is the minimum amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction”.

Defining a physical entity in terms of its interaction seems odd, but that’s because extremely small objects simultaneously have the characteristics of both 1) particles of mass and 2) transfer of energy / waves within a discrete area, exactly like waves of water in the ocean.

Physicists call this the “wave / energy -particle / mass duality.”

Think of how macroscopic water molecules are both 1) mass which lies at rest at the seashore in which children can safely play, and also 2) as the waves of energy, which as a tsunami can wreak US$10b of damages and over 200,000 deaths.

A tiny quantum wave is measured just like a massive ocean wave, which, logically, means it must be consistently constrained, or forced together, within 1) a time frame of measurement, and in a system – where the units are forced together in a bound state – like the ocean’s surrounding wind overhead, floor beneath, and the dry land all around.

Continue reading “24) Quantum Physics Validates A Creator-Sustainer”

25) Statistics Validate Belief In God

From the Department of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health: intimate relations exist between mathematics and material reality, that counting and categorizing are the currency of durable knowledge, and that empirical study of variegated humanity…can uncover universal truths.
Incidence and prevalence are measures used to describe patterns in communities.

Incidence measures the number of new persons experiencing a condition within a population, during a given period of time.

Prevalence measures the total number of people within the total population experiencing a condition during a given period of time.

From a research perspective, the place to start investigating the reality of a religious belief is the statistical evidence of
  • high incidence  – consistently high numbers of new believers over time
  • and high prevalence – consistently high numbers of adherents over time.

Religion has been a factor of the human experience since pre-historic to modern times. There is no culture recorded in human history which has not practiced some form of religion. This fact alone lends credibility to believing in religion.

Continue reading “25) Statistics Validate Belief In God”

26) Provenance Validates The Bible

Definition of provenance

  1. Origin – derivation of a source
  2. Source –
    1. a point of origin or procurement : BEGINNING
    2. one that initiates :
      1. AUTHOR
      2. PROTOTYPE,
      3. MODEL
    3. one that supplies information
  3. The history of ownership of a valued object, or work of art or literature

The provenance for any religious text or belief can only be derived from its Author Being

  • the Origin of what it describes
  • therefore the Autho-rity / Sustainer to prevent degenerate into chaos over time
  • therefore the Sustainer of Life throughout eternity after Time ends.

The Written Word Is The Final Authority

In the medical and legal professions where life and death hang in the balance, before a diagnosis like “cancer” or a verdict of “guilty” can be made, the evidence on which the determination has been made has to be documented in writing and presented as proof. 

if-it-wasn-t-documented-it-wasn-t-done-l

The Bible follows, even more stringently, the same written documentation process. Significantly, the God of the Bible does not expect humans to take anything on blind trust in a revelation –  even by himself.

Continue reading “26) Provenance Validates The Bible”

27) Creation Science

Creation Scienceemerged in its modern form with the 1961 publication of The Genesis Flood by John Whitcomb and Henry Morris.

“”In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in…the same day [all at once] were

  1. all the fountains of the great deep [on earth] broken up,
  2. and the windows of heaven were openedforty days and forty nights.” (Genesis 7:10-12)

If a worldwide flood actually destroyed the entire antediluvian human population, as well as all land animals, except those preserved in a special Ark constructed by Noah…then its historical and scientific implications are tremendous.”

Indeed yes, because “as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man…The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.” (Luke 17:26-27, Genesis 6:12-13)

Unlike charlatans’ predictions which are hit or miss, biblical prophecies are credible because scientifically validated biblical accounts of past identical occasions prove them trustworthy.

And the world-wide cataclysmic flooding that left unmistakable geological evidence during Noah’s flood previously happened, leaving even more trace evidence, during creation.

In the beginning God created…the earth. And the earth [AKA soil] was [came to be] without form [i.e. liquified], and void [empty]; and darkness [the opposition to God’s creative light, i.e. destructive force of evil] was upon the face of the deep [surging mass of water].

Multiple geochemical studies have concluded that asteroid hits are most likely the primary source of Earth’s water. The sequence of originally dry earth to inundated is established by the dry earth’s resurfacing, and by Job’s parallel account.

Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding…Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb? When I made the cloud the garment thereof…And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors,” (Job 38:4-10)

“And God said, Let the waters [multiplicity indicated by plurality] under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry [land] appear: and it was so. And God called the dry [land] Earth (singular), and the collection of the waters (plural, both above and under the heaven) he called Seas (plural) (Genesis 1:9-10)

The biblical account is validated by geological science’s discovery of Pangea, also spelled Pangaea, in early geologic time, a supercontinent that incorporated almost all the landmasses on Earth…surrounded by a global ocean called Panthalassawas first proposed in 1912 by German meteorologist Alfred Wegener.

j39njm2xemjmcnsh-636717599841329053

Continue reading “27) Creation Science”

28) No Time In Creation

The 1925 Scopes “Monkey” Trial charged high school biology teacher John Scopes with breaking the law by teaching Darwinian evolution in a public school. He was in fact guilty of breaking existing law, and duly convicted. Therefore his renowned defense attorney Clarence Darrow argued for a bigger issue – eliminating the Bible as a credible source of history and science and relegating it to personal faith. 

This was a problem for the elite who were at the forefront of intellectual developments but also identified as Christian to be acceptable to the masses. Hence options for interpretation were inserted into the Genesis account of creation to account for evolution.

Many people have become agnostics because of the supposed conflict between the Bible and science.  In truth, there is no conflict at all between a correct translation of the Bible and really proven science.

science knows human beings have lived on the earth far longer than the few thousand years covered by the Bible.

Note – this assumes that evolution is a “really proven science” which it is not.

the truth is that the Bible nowhere says that Adam was the first man…— it merely says that Adam was the first man of a new [creation] or the White race.

Wow! Bald faced lie! Note the failure to provide the biblical reference for this statement, and the obfuscation of the clear biblical statement, supported by historical sources such as Herodotus and scientific sources such as DNA evidence as presented in later posts, that the white race is descended from Noah’s son Japheth after a catastrophe wiped out the majority of humanity.

Moving on with this misinterpretation:

Continue reading “28) No Time In Creation”

SECTION V: Evolution Is Unscientific Dogma

Science employs a particular vocabulary for describing how ideas are proposed, tested, and supported or disproven.

theory is a principle that has been substantiated by data through rigorous experimentation and control, but is not scientifically considered to have been proven to be truth.

hypothesis is an assumption, something proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true.

In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review. You ask a question, read up on what has been studied before, and then form a hypothesis.

Evolution has been aggressively advertised as scientific truth in opposition to religious dogma since its inception in the 19th century. But when we review the basis to the claims of Evolution we find it absolutely cannot claim to be even a hypothesis.

Continue reading “SECTION V: Evolution Is Unscientific Dogma”

29) The Bone Wars

The Bone Wars, also known as the Great Dinosaur Rush,[1] was a period of intense and ruthlessly competitive fossil hunting…marked by a heated rivalry between Edward Drinker Cope (of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia) and Othniel Charles Marsh (of the Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale). Each of the two paleontologists used underhanded methods to try to outdo the other in the field, resorting to bribery, theft, and the destruction of bones. Each scientist also sought to ruin his rival’s reputation and cut off his funding, using attacks in scientific publications…

The paleontologists had a habit of making hasty telegrams eastward describing their finds, only publishing fuller accounts after returning from trips. Among the new specimens described by the men were UintatheriumLoxolophodonEobasileusDinoceras, and Tinoceras. The problem was that many of these finds were not uniquely different from each other…

The Bone Wars of the mid-1800s resulted in a lot of dubious species

Continue reading “29) The Bone Wars”

30) Evidence For Genus Homo Begins With Species Sapiens

From The Smithsonian Institute: While people used to think that there was a single line of human species, with one evolving after the other…we now know this is not the case.

Then why is Evolution still being presented – and accepted – as a known single line of precursor species evolving into modern humans?

Fossil evidence for the human species begins with the human species.

The early fossils are not considered ancestors to Homo sapiens but are important to the study of the lineage. After the beginning of the Holocene, [consistent with the 6th day of creation] all fossils are Homo sapiens (anatomically modern humans).

Continue reading “30) Evidence For Genus Homo Begins With Species Sapiens”