16) Evidence For Genus Homo Begins With Species Sapiens

Fossil evidence for the human species begins with the human species.

From The Smithsonian Institute:

From skeletons to teeth, early human fossils have been found of more than 6,000 individuals. With the rapid pace of new discoveries every year, this impressive sample means that even though some early human species are only represented by one or a few fossils, others are represented by thousands of fossils…

While people used to think that there was a single line of human species, with one evolving after the other…we now know this is not the case…

I’m confused. Isn’t the whole concept of evolution based on species evolving into new species?

And what does the Smithsonian mean about “early” human fossils if not “ancestors” of modern humans?

And why is Evolution still being presented – and accepted – as a known single line of species evolving into modern humans?

Continue reading “16) Evidence For Genus Homo Begins With Species Sapiens”

17) Genetic Evidence Debunks Evolution

Genetic studies have determined that all humans share a common male and female ancestor, informally calling them Adam and Eve.

Male ancestry is tracked, logically, through the male-specific Y chromosome (called Y-DNA). Geneticists have isolated distinct human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroups based on sequential accumulation of mutations over time. The man with the original non-mutated DNA, informally known as Y-chromosomal Adam, is acknowledged by geneticists to be the male ancestor of all living humans.

This following genetic research on the male-only Y chromosome is based on the recognition that genetic variation is caused by mutations over time. This study provides a second scientific witness to the mitochondrial Eve study, validating the historical accuracy of the biblical account of one human / ha adam being the father of all humans today.

Continue reading “17) Genetic Evidence Debunks Evolution”

18) Genetic Evidence That Noah & Sons Generated Nations

According to genetic studies, at one time in the past humanity experienced a “population bottlenecka sharp reduction in the size of a population due to environmental events such as…flood.”

“[M]ost Eurasian men (living outside Africa)…can be traced back to four ancestors

According to the Bible, after a world-wide flood approximately 4,500 years ago, only four men were available to repopulate the entire earth with humanity. 

  1. Noah was…perfect in his generations [his genes had not been corrupted]. And Noah begat three sons,
  2. Shem,
  3. Ham, and
  4. Japheth.” (Genesis 6:9-10)

The investigators deny the validity of the historical biblical account, which is much too recent in time for the Evolutionary model. However, the studies’

  1. internal unreliability
  2. and external invalidation by scientific knowledge

disproves their Evolutionary model and establishes the unscientific nature of their claims.

For instance, the Y-haploid study ranks the Y Haplogroups from

  • “possible time of origin” beginning at ~275,000 years ago,
  • a “possible place of origin” in Africa taking 200,000 years before emigration to a neighboring area,.
  • and tens of thousands of years again before emigration to the next nearest landmass

Can anyone take this seriously?!

Chronological development of haplogroups

Haplogroup Possible time of origin Possible place of origin Possible MRCA
A00 235,900 or 275,000 years ago Africa 235,900 years ago
BT 130,700 years ago Africa 88,000 years ago
CT 88,000 or 101-100,000 years ago Africa 68,500 years ago
E 65,200, 69,000, or 73,000 years ago East Africa or Asia 53,100 years ago
F 65,900 years ago Eurasia 48,800 years ago
G 48,500 years ago Middle East 26,200 years ago
IJ 47,200 years ago Middle East 42,900 years ago
K 47,200 years ago Asia 45,400 years ago
P 45,400 years ago Asia 31,900 years ago
J 42,900 years ago Middle East 31,600 years ago
I 42,900 years ago Europe 27,500 years ago
E-M215 (E1b1b) 42,300 years ago East Africa 34,800 years ago
E-V38 (E1b1a) 42,300 years ago East Africa 40,100 years ago
N 36,800 years ago Asia 22,100 years ago
E1b1b-M35 34,800 years ago East Africa 24,100 years ago
R 31,900 years ago Asia 28,200 years ago
J-M267 (J1) 31,600 years ago Middle East 18,500 years ago
J-M172 (J2) 31,600 years ago Middle East 27,800 years ago
R-M173 (R1) 28,200 years ago Asia 22,800 years ago
I-M253 (I1) 27,500 years ago Europe 4,600 years ago
I-M438 (I2) 27,500 years ago Europe 21,800 years ago
R-M420 (R1a) 22,800 years ago Eurasia 18,300 years ago
R-M343 (R1b) 22,800 years ago Eurasia 20,400 years ago
I2-L460 (I2a) 21,800 years ago Europe 21,100 years ago
I2a-P37 21,100 years ago Europe 18,500 years ago
E1b1b-M78 19,800 years ago Northeast Africa 13,400 years ago
I2a-M423 18,500 years ago Europe 13,500 years ago
I2a-M223 17,400 years ago Europe 12,100 years ago
N1c-M178 14,200 years ago Asia 11,900 years ago
R1a-M17 14,100 years ago Eastern Europe 8,500 years ago
R1b-M269 13,300 years ago Eastern Europe 6,400 years ago
E1b1b-V12 11,800 years ago North Africa 9,900 years ago
E-U175 (E1b1a8) 9,200 years ago East Africa 8,500 years ago
E1b1b-V13 8,100 years ago Southern Europe 4,800 years ago
E-M191 (E1b1a7) 7,400 years ago East Africa 6,400 years ago
E-U174 (E1b1a-U174) 6,400 years ago East Africa 5,300 years ago
R1b-L151 5,800 years ago Eastern Europe 4,800 years ago
R1a-Z280 5,000 years ago Eastern Europe 4,600 years ago
R1a-M458 4,700 years ago Eastern Europe 4,700 years ago

Beside the overt racism granting Europeans the highest development and survival on the evolutionary scale, the most informative element of the time chart should be glaringly obvious, and it’s not even the pervasive use of the modifier “possible”.

It is the fundamental irrationality of the Evolutionary model.

  • claiming these groups formed by continuous minimal incremental mutations over long periods of time,
    • and at the same time asserting a gap of upwards of hundreds of thousands of years during which no mutations occurred between the origination of a set of mutations and their presence in the “most recent common ancestor” / MRCA,
    • NOR any mutations during the time between the MRCA and their descendants currently living who are carrying those mutations
  • so the total span of time between each group’s genetic stability is enormous
    • while during this same time mutations were ongoing and forming other haplogroups. 

Just a couple of examples:

  • Haplogroup C possibly originated 100,000 years ago in Africa currently found – in the exact same condition but far from each other in Asia, Oceania, and North America.
    • where they were exposed to diverse environmentally exclusive gene-altering viruses and other mutagens.
  • Haplogroup D possibly originated 70,000 years ago in Africa currently found in Tibet, Nigeria, and the Middle East.
    • How did members of this group manage to live among other groups in the populous Fertile Crescent (get the pun?) for 70,000 years without other people’s genetics jumping into their gene pool?

This also highlights the elitists’ fundamental racism, despite masses of scientific evidence to the contrary.

At the turn of the century elitists used Darwin’s newly developed idea of evolution to claim that this Negroid division of the human race was not, after all, a division of the human race, but subhuman on the evolutionary scale. “Scientists” from the most highly respected universities and the prestigious Smithsonian Institute ruled that  dark-skinned peoples were on par with animals so did not qualify for “We, the People” rights.

This allowed proponents of racism – now “scientifically” supported by “evolution” as “race hygiene” to argue passionately for extermination of dark-skinned peoples as a natural part of human evolution’s highest race – blond, blue-eyed Nordic peoples. Sound familiar?

The Nazis’ 1940’s genocidal policies were rooted in Darwinism and established by American “scientists” at the turn of the century.

Further discoveries from the human genome and its expression in the population as a whole has brought about the insight that Skin Color is Not Race.

The genes which are responsible for most of the variation between human populations in complexion have been identified…About half a dozen genes of large effect can explain 90% of…variance. Some of the genes, such as SLC24A5, are so ancestrally informative that…you can ascertain ancestry in mixed populations simply by inspecting its frequency [within the population]. With that said, I recently reread an “old” paper from the ancient days before human pigmentation was elucidated with any depth, that is, 2004… Implications of correlations between skin color and genetic ancestry for biomedical research. 

A quick summary of the research: it studied three groups of people known to have a mix of ancestry to see if skin color was a reliable predictor of ancestry, i.e. does lighter skin match, or correlate, with more European ancestry and darker skin with more African? It turns out, it does not.

As you can see the correlation is relatively weak between ancestry and complexion in the Mexican and Mexican American sample. It is stronger among Puerto Ricans. And modest among the African groups...The reason is that only a small subset of genes control the variation which we use to classify people as members of a particular populationPuerto Rico is a small island, and has been subject to a lot of immigration from Spain in the 20th century. Correlation between skin color and European ancestry probably has to do with a great deal of recent admixture.

In order to align with the Evolutionary model, advances in knowledge of genetic mutations, currently available in our COVID-obsessed era, have not been applied to the human Y-chromosome haplogroups genetic analyses.

Adam is estimated to have lived roughly 236,000 years ago based on the calculation that the human Y-chromosome accumulates roughly two mutations per generation.

In reality, “Every time human DNA is passed from one generation to the next it accumulates 100–200 new mutations, according to a DNA-sequencing analysis of the Y chromosome…”

When we change the biased and outright deceptive factor of 1-2 mutations per generation to the scientifically known 100-200 mutations per generation, we arrive at the calculation of only 2,000 -4,000 years since the Most Common Ancestor. This is consistent with the time of Noah’s flood, and marks Noah, only “the seventh from Adam” who was “perfect in his generations” i.e. genetic ancestry, as carrying the original human’s created genetics.

SECTION III: The Reality Option

Like evolution, all scientific theories are a work in progress

In the 18th century, the existence of family relationships between different species was spelt out in the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus’s grouping of living things into species, genera, orders and so on, but there was no suggestion of how things got that way.

Oh that is not true.

Linnaeus, along with all naturalists of his time, subscribed to the idea that every living thing on earth had been created by God in the course of a single week.

How interesting that “Three hundred years after the great Swedish naturalist’s birth, scientists the world over are still using the system he invented to classify plants and animals” even though “there was no notion in his system of one species developing or evolving from another. That idea was still a hundred years in the future. ”

Continue reading “SECTION III: The Reality Option”

19) The Big Bang Theory Is Just A Show

About 13.8 billion years ago, the universe sprang into existence in an event known as the big bang.The early universe was…extraordinarily dense. In fact, scientists think that at one point the entire observable universe would have been about the size of a soccer ball.

As the universe expanded, it became vastly larger…[Dating] methods use the universe’s expansion rate to determine the age. Hubble and the European Space Agency’s Gaia space observatory calculate this rate by…studying the local universe… 

board-exam-memes-8The European Space Agency’s Planck mission uses a different method, mapping the newborn universe…with microwaves…However, those predictions don’t exactly match Hubble’s and Gaia’s measurements of our nearby contemporary universe…

Almost everyone has heard the story of the Big Bang. But if you ask anyone, from a layperson to a cosmologist, to finish the following sentence, “In the beginning, there was…” you’ll get a slew of different answers. One of the most common ones is “a singularity,” which refers to an instant where all the matter and energy in the Universe was concentrated into a single point…

But this picture isn’t just wrong, it’s nearly 40 years out of date! We are absolutely certain there was no singularity associated with the hot Big Bang

Continue reading “19) The Big Bang Theory Is Just A Show”

20) Existential Theories Are Works In Progress

Even today, the genius scientists of our time equipped with most technological instruments, greatest financial resources world-wide provided by competing governments employing huge numbers of staff, can’t explain gravity and the other forces maintaining a stable world.

Current theories on how the universe consists are based on concepts – NOT PROVEN  laws – of physics developed by Isaac Newton about 400 years ago. After observing an apple fall from a tree. Not much of a basis for a scientific “law” of gravity, you’d think.

Yet for 400 years this “law”, and others like it, were accepted as the assumptions on which all astronomical calculations and considerations were based.

There is no theory of gravity that fully explains the observed effects of gravity.

Sir Isaac Newton’s explanation of how it works was based on the [mechanical] observations that were available at his time, including the falling of objects of mass as apples on or near to the Earth’s surface, and the orbits of the Planets and the Moon. He assumed that there was a force from the Sun and the Earth and other large bodies…

Professor Albert Einstein…produced a General Theory of Relativity that described the movement of bodies in an energy field causing gravity effects. It does not cover all observed gravity and has to be tweaked…by a Cosmological Constant.

The latest theory, by a Professor Verlinde, is being studied and shows some promise, but it is strictly theoretical and will be difficult to understand since it is based on the existence of energy not proven to exist. 

Continue reading “20) Existential Theories Are Works In Progress”

22) Quantum Physics In The Bible

Consider what physics has deduced that the infinite beginning must have been like.

  • filled with energy inherent to space itself.
    • This is the biblical God’s explanation of himself. “God is a Spirit / energy.” (John 2:24)
  • which causes a rapid, exponential expansion. “In far less time than it takes to blink an eye, the universe blew up by 100 trillion trillion times in size.”
    • We can reverse engineer the biblical description of the transformation back from the state of entropy / disorder / corruption to the original state of enthalpy / containment of all energy. “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye…this corruptible must put on incorruption…the whole creation itself.” (I Corinthians 15:52, Romans 8:22-23.) 
  • that stretches the Universe flat, gives it the same properties everywhere, with small-amplitude quantum fluctuations, that get stretched to all scales (even super-horizon ones),
    • Described as such in the Bible. “Ah LORD God! behold, thou hast made the heaven and the earth by thy great power and stretched out arm, and there is nothing too hard for thee:” (Jeremiah 32:17)
  • and then…converts that energy…into matter and radiation…
    • Described as creation in the beginning of the Bible. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth…And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.” (Genesis 1:1, 16)
  • As a hyper dimensional being, to four dimensional beings he is
    • “the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15)

Continue reading “22) Quantum Physics In The Bible”

23) Statistics Support Belief In God

Should you base your beliefs on quips made by media influencers on the latest – and short-lived cultural fads?

From the Department of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health

[I]ntimate relations exist between mathematics and material reality, that counting and categorizing are the currency of durable knowledge, and that empirical study of variegated humanity…can uncover universal truths. The common origins of contemporary epidemiology and social sciences can accordingly be traced to Western Europe in the 14th—16th centuries, when quantification of phenomena…becomes a potent new mode of describing and predicting events of the heavens and earth…

What universal truths on religion are revealed in statistical studies?

Continue reading “23) Statistics Support Belief In God”

24) Provenance Proves The God Of the Bible

Definition of provenance

  1. Origin – derivation of a source
  2. Source –
    1. a point of origin or procurement : BEGINNING
    2. one that initiates :
      1. AUTHOR
      2. PROTOTYPE,
      3. MODEL
    3. one that supplies information
  3. The history of ownership of a valued object, or work of art or literature

The provenance for any religious text or belief can only be derived from its Author Being

  • the Origin of Everything
  • therefore the Authority / Sustainer on how Everything doesn’t degenerate into chaos
  • therefore the Sustainer of Life after Time ends.

Continue reading “24) Provenance Proves The God Of the Bible”