Kingdom Come

The calendar in Genesis 11 allows us to date the breakup of Pangea at about 200 years after the flood. This correlates with scientific tracking of seismic activity following the initial breakup / all the fountains of the great deep broken up (Genesis 7:11, 8:2)

In seismology, an aftershock is a smaller earthquake that follows a larger earthquake, in the same area of the main shock, caused as the displaced crust adjusts to the effects of the main shock. Large earthquakes can have hundreds to thousands of instrumentally detectable aftershocks, which steadily decrease in magnitude and frequency according to a consistent pattern. In some earthquakes the main rupture happens in two or more steps, resulting in multiple main shocks. These are known as doublet earthquakes, and in general can be distinguished from aftershocks in having similar magnitudes and nearly identical seismic waveforms.

“Now these are the 1) generations / genetics / races of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham and Japheth…2) in their nations:” (Genesis 10:1, 32)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftershock

There are different interpretations of what was actually divided. If we take a straightforward translation from the Hebrew we accept that the physical earth is what is reported here. Interpreting the report of this earth division as being caused by the usual aftershocks of the initial massive tectonic upheavals during the flood, as described in that post, is simply to be expected. Geological science confirms this interpretation.  

The breakup of Pangea into continents surrounded by oceans separated humanity into smaller isolates as well. Enforced inbreeding among geographically separated groups rapidly stabilized the genetic makeup of the groups, identifiable as paternal Y-chromosome and maternal mitochondrial haploid groups.

The breakup of one large landmass at this time would also certainly expedite the breakup of one empire into independent nations – 

 

socio-political groupings of people, not necessarily composed of people with common ancestry. One’s genetics – their family – is imposed, for better or for worse, and can’t be changed. But’s ones associates – social, political and religious identity – are valued assets often sought to improve one’s lot in life, which is why multitudes of people emigrate to another country where citizenship is a privilege bestowed on those on those deemed worthy of the benefits of belonging to that nation. 

Semites is a term for racial group associated with people of the Middle East, including Arabs, Jews, Akkadians, and Phoenicians. First used in the 1770s by members of the Göttingen school of history, this biblical terminology for race was derived from Shem, but is now obsolete, and replaced by Mongoloid.

Hamites: now called the Negroid division of the human race, found wherever that Indian Ocean touches land, with dark-skin, strongly developed jaws, relatively long arms and kinky or frizzly hair.

Japhetites, found in ethnological and linguistic writing from the 18th to the 20th century for white people, now called the Caucasian race.

Different from race, a nation is a community of people who share the same language, history, ethnicity, i.e. culture – the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, and habits of that defines and maintains the norms and expectations within a society.

“On the Day of Pentecost there many of these nations present: “Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia [Minor], Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes.” (Acts 2:8-10)

Continue reading “SECTION XXI: The Nations”

Both Hammurabi’s and Moses’ codes share the same claim to further the welfare, not just of one nation, but “for all of mankind”. The difference between the two codes – and this is huge – lies in the contractual nature of Hammurabi’s Law and the covenantal nature of the Mosaic Law. There is no consent of the governed in a contract – it is rule by a dictator by any title of king, president, etc., and human nature is such that the powerful rulers exploit the powerless masses.

The Greeks recognized this problem when they replaced their kings with new forms of government. First came Demo-cracy – People Power, as opposed to Aristo-cracy – rule by the aristocrates, or Theo-cracy – Rule by God or gods. In Athens, all male citizens were eligible to participate in the city’s governing assembly. Obviously, this only works in small city states, and most of all, worked because anyone who didn’t fit in was eliminated.

Ostracism was a democratic procedure in which any citizen could be expelled from the city-state of Athens for ten years. It was used as a way of neutralizing someone thought to be a threat to the state though in many cases popular opinion often informed the expulsion. The word “ostracism” continues to be used for various cases of social shunning.

Execution was also used to keep the status quo, Socrates being a famous example.

Socrates’ student Plato conceived of the Republic – from Latin rēs (“thing”) + pūblica (“public”); hence literally “the public thing”, i.e. rule of the people using representatives.

The Republic, one of the most important dialogues of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, renowned for its detailed expositions of political and ethical justice and its account of the organization of the ideal state (or city-state)…what justice is and why it is in each person’s best interest to be just.

According to Plato, the ideal state comprises three social classes: rulers, guardians, and producers e.g., farmers and craftsmen. The rulers, who are philosophers, pursue the good of the entire state on the basis of their knowledge of the form of the Good and the form of the Just…Political justice, then, is the condition of a state in which each social class performs its own role properly, leaving aside the role of any other class.

Plato recognized that the individuals making up society must also be Good and Just for this system to work. Corresponding to the three social classes are the three parts of the individual soul:

1. reason desires truth and the good of the whole individual
2. spirit is preoccupied with honour and competitive values
3. and appetite has the traditional low tastes for food, drink, and sex.

Justice in the individual, or ethics, is analogous to that of political justice—a state of psychic harmony in which each part of the soul performs its role properly. 

This is baseline Humanism, the belief that humans have the power to overcome the essential hormonal and neurological drives of the human body and soul, inherent to the mortality that allows growth and development as well as ultimately death.

the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good…but I am carnal [flesh, hormonal and neurotransmitter-driven]…what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good…For to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not….O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death…?

God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but…[mind] the things of the Spirit [of God in us].” (Romans 7, 8:3-5)

Hammurabi’s and Moses’ codes both explicitly state that their purpose is “to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land.” Since mankind’s inherent life-sustaining nature is focused on personal growth and development, this requires a rule of law to prevent injustice.

And here is where the Mosaic Law – a covenant – absolutely did not plagiarize the Code of Hammurabi – a contract.

Hammurabi’s Laws assign socially approved / disallowed behaviors and punishments, while the Mosaic Law deals with the cause of destructive behavior, not just its effects, and prevents, not just punishes, social damage through its demands on personal and national holiness.

Most of all, Hammurabi or the Supreme Court of the United States or any other leadership forum can’t simply arbitrarily call into existence the rightness or wrongness of actions. Just like defying laws of physics will inevitably cause destruction, so too breaking laws of human nature will inevitably lead to destruction.

For example, Hammurabi’s code imposed a fine on anyone who caused a pregnant woman to lose her child, while the Book of the Covenant required a life for a life, not only recognizing but teaching the sanctity – and value – of life.

“After nearly thirty years, the data suggest that abortion has been anything but good for the United States.” The economic consequences alone are that abortion (the modern clinically approved manner of child sacrifice)

• reduced the size of the economy,
• undercut one main cause of the American economy’s current dynamism: innovation,
• reduced the standard of living of the average America household
• is single-handedly responsible for anticipated imbalances in the Social Security retirement system,
• is perhaps the single largest American economic event of the past century, more significant than the Great Depression or the Second World War.

“the analysis warns that if it continues unchecked, legal abortion will progressively erode both America’s relative economic importance and her average absolute standard of living.”

Another example of the impossibility of reversing a law of nature by decree is the massive numbers of innocent deaths by AIDS caused by unlimited political support of homosexuality. See relevant post for details. 

The Melchizedekian Covenant, defined in great detail in the Mosaic Law, protects the disenfranchised members of society, regardless of their place or rank in society, while the Code of Hammurabi is interested only in the free men class and gives special protection to the middle and higher social classes of Babylon…the lower classes, the wardu (slaves) and the mushkenu (free person of low estate) have no such protection. Taking the life of your own slave was no-one’s business but your own, and taking the life of another man’s slave might only bring a fine.

The superiority of God’s Laws is that obedience (and holiness) is the desired outcome, so that a relationship with God is made possible, but the Law of Hammurabi’s goal is for longevity of the king and prosperity for the nation’s elite class, regardless of who gets hurt.

As much as irreligious people like to fault the laws of Moses, objectively speaking the Mosaic Covenant provides well for the quality of life of its subjects in the kingdom.

• There is one day out of seven free from labor as opposed to the Egyptian and Roman one day out of ten,
• as well as one full year’s vacation out of seven,
• redistribution of resources to those unable to provide for themselves via a low  ~22% income tax,
• and periodic elimination of debt.
• ensuring equal distribution of resources to all subjects, with no wealthy elite gaining power over the impoverished.

There is a sharp contrast between contractual laws simply cursing the unrighteousness and covenant blessings giving second chances.

The presumption here is not that loans are made to exploit commercial opportunity, but rather to avert disaster. Indeed the Mosaic law encourages such lending: “If there is a poor man among your brothers in any of the towns of the land that the LORD your God is giving you, do not be hardhearted or tightfisted toward your poor brother. Rather be openhanded and freely lend him what he needs.” (Deut. 15: 7-8, NIV)

Compare the assurances of debt relief in the Mosaic Covenant with the Mesopotamian reactionary debt release practices during crises.

In Hammurabi’s time…The peasantry was provided with land…tools, draught animals, livestock, and water for irrigation, so that they could grow food…they had to pay to the State as rent…When the harvest was poor, they accumulated debts. If peasants were unable to pay off their debts, they could also find themselves reduced to the condition of serfs or slaves…after 1400 BC; inequality increased and intensified. Land was taken over by big private land-owners and debt enslavement became commonplace. The ensuing centuries…have evidence of violent social struggles between creditors and debtors.”

Contrast with the oversight and restrictions placed on leaders in God’s kingdom.

“Now the sons of Eli [chief priest and judge over the kingdom of Israel] were sons of Belial; they knew not the LORD. And there came a man of God unto Eli and said unto him… Wherefore…  honourest thy sons above me, …thy two sons, on Hophni and Phinehas; in one day they shall die both of them.” (I Samuel 2:12-36)

“And Samuel said to Saul, Thou hast done foolishly: thou hast not kept the commandment of the LORD thy God, which he commanded thee: for now would the Lord have established thy kingdom upon Israel for ever. But now thy kingdom shall not continue:” (I Samuel 13:13-14, Acts 13:22)

The common feature between the two types of agreements is the eternal condition of the spiritual life of the ruler.

• In contractual paganism, the ruler obeyed the demands of the god who experienced “life” by indwelling him – in short, demon possession – maximizing the quality of life of the god by plundering the lives of his worshippers. Can we not recognize this down through the ages by the exorbitant lifestyles of the rich and famous extracted by extortionate policies against the masses?
• But under YHVH’s covenant, Melchizedek Adam lived on in the DNA of the Order of Melchizedek through a dynasty of heirs culminating in The Seed of the Woman who achieved eternal life through union with God for ALL kings AND subjects in his kingdom by gathering the people in, not an insurrection, but a resurrection.

To determine the type of any nation, we only need to measure the morality of the ruler and the welfare of the people in action, not words. What is America in 2025?

As we read the following, compare Monotheism’s introduction to the Code of Hammurabi’s pagan preamble.

Monotheism

 “I am / Ani the LORD / YHVH / Creator, and there is none else! there is no God beside me... 

I the LORD do all these things…Woe unto him that striveth with his Maker!…Woe unto him that saith unto his father, What begettest thou? or to the woman, What hast thou brought forth?…

• I have made the earth, and created man upon it..
• I have raised him up in righteousness, and
• I will direct all his ways: he shall build my city, and he shall let go my captives, not for price nor reward, saith the LORD of hosts….in chains they shall come over, and they shall fall down unto thee, they shall make supplication unto thee, saying, Surely God is in thee; and there is none else, there is no God…

For thus saith the LORD that…formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited…I have not spoken in secret…

Assemble yourselves and come; draw near together, ye that are escaped of the nations: they have no knowledge that set up the wood of their graven image, and pray unto a god that cannot save….

who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and there is no God else beside ME; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside ME.

Look unto ME, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God / Power, and there is none else.” (Isaiah 45)

Tragically, as evidenced by God’s plea, many people chose Luciferian Humanism. We can track YHVH’s rival through name changes over history by his claimed attributes of being present in the light of the sun giving life and wisdom. As there was nothing which he did not see, he was the judge of all. Hammurabi’s law code (1792-1750 BCE) based its authority on this god’s power to create – and enforce – his laws.

We can even track this god into modern times through linguistics.

Continue reading “115) Covenant God vs Contract God”

“And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him…thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee… and kings shall come out of thee.” (Genesis 17:1-5)

The easiest way to explain Abraham’s designation as “Father” is to compare his role to his current counterpart.

“Pope”  (Latin: papa, from Greek: πάππας, romanized: páppas, lit. ‘father’), AKA “Holy” Father, is

1. head priest of the worldwide Catholic Church,
2. and also head of state or sovereign of the Holy See.

The word “see” comes from the Latin word sedes, meaning ‘seat’, which refers to the throne (cathedra) used in the Catholic Church to refer specifically to The Apostolic See, the throne of the Bishop of Rome, whom that Church sees as the successor of Saint Peter at the cathedral of the Holy See, the Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran in the city of Rome.

The Holy See / Throne. like the State of Israel proclaimed in 1948, is a politically sovereign entity recognized by international law. Housed within Vatican City, a geographical enclave within the separate city of Rome. As a political state, it brings its power to bear within international organizations and by means of its diplomatic relations and political accords with other much larger countries.

Continue reading “116) The Hebrew Commonwealth Of Nations”

When Nimrod’s tower enterprise fell apart at Babel in the land of Shinar, and Asshur, a rebel son of Shem, hunts down the scattering nations to corral them back, Shem as “the father of all the children of Eber”, ordains Eber to go out into the world to minister to the fleeing refugees.

That’s just a bit confusing. How is Shem the father of all the children of Eber?

In the same sense of spiritual authority, exactly what the more familiar Abraham “the father of all them that believe”, inherited as his Melchizedekian role.

Cultural historians confirm the biblical account that righteous Shem’s great-grandson Eber is the namesake founder of the Hebrews of whom Abraham “our father” is the first person identified as such.

“Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah, Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Abram; the same is Abraham.” (I Chronicles 1:24-17)

“Little is known about the oldest eras of ancient Hebrew civilization because the culture was nomadic.”

And that would be because they were running for their lives. Continue reading “116) Covenantal Monotheism Available In All The Nations Of The World”

We can only understand the Trojan War in the context of its trigger – competition between nations to create weaponized hybrid beings. Mistake the Trojan War for a myth and you won’t understand what is assumed you know, so minimally detailed, in Revelation regarding the same military tactic at the end of time.

To begin with, Greece of this era was not in any way a nation. Instead, the rocky peninsulas and archipelagoes housed a number of small but powerful city-states, each of whom considered themselves proudly independent. So it was no mean feat when Agamemnon managed to bind them together into a unified force for the assault on Asian Troy. The equivalent situation in modern times is the European Union’s support of Ukraine against Russia’s invasion.

Trojan / Canaanite King Priam and Crown Prince Hektor assembled their allies from city- states all along the western Anatolian coastal regions (modern Turkey) and as far away as Elam (modern Iran). The equivalent modern situation is North Korean troops joining Russian forces in Ukraine.

The reason for the war was that Hamites weren’t the only ones parenting supermen. Every nation that aspired to power required a Mother of gods carrying hyper dimensional genes in her ovum. And the Trojans’ seizure of Helen was the equivalent of stealing the ways and means to produce nuclear weapons.

Before Helen, there was Medea. Even more famous than Helen in Greek mythology. Medea appears in the majority of the most ancient sources, including Argonautica by Apollonius Rhodius, Histories by Herodotus, Theogony by Hesiod, Metamorphoses by Ovid, and in several plays including Medea by Euripides.

Medea was the daughter of King Aeetes of Colchis, who traced his [pre-Flood] lineage to Apollo and an Oceanid, i.e. a female hybrid, so Medea carried hyperdimensional genes in her ovum. Medea was also priestess to the goddess of witches, Hecate. Altogether Medea was a prime acquisition for the western-most recently settled colonies of pioneers in Europe at this time when she fled her home with Jason of the Argonauts. However, she used her power to cut a swath of destruction across Greece in every city-state she visited.

Cersei Lannister, unquestionably named after Medea’s aunt and fellow sorceress Circe, can’t hold a candle to this pair of evil queen mothers.

Continue reading “115) The Trojan War”

In the mid-fifth century BC, the Father of History Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus visited Tyre, spoke to a priest, and learned that the town and the temple of Melqart were, at that time, believed to be 2,300 years old. In other words, the city was founded in the twenty-eighth century BC, prior to the biblical date of the Flood ~2350 BC.

Herodotus does not mention a world-wide flood, but he would have known of it as he systematically gathered history from multiple cultures. It is likely he saw no reason to report what was already preserved and well known. The histories and wisdom of “the world that then was” was preserved through the Flood in vaults or on the ark, then gathered in libraries available to Herodotus and other sages.

In support of this consideration, Herodotus likewise does not give an account of Assyria’s origin or of the history of the Semites in Mesopotamia. It’s as if he consigns these records to the same category as known history in the collected works of the sages. Instead, Herodotus’ account most evidently picks up Japhethite / European history where the holy scriptures drops it to focus on the Hebrew nation, immediately after the dispersal of nations from Babel.

Herodotus reports that the Phoenicians / Canaanites had “recently come from that which is called the Erythraian Sea / Persian Gulf to this of ours / Mediterranean Sea, and having settled in the coastland  where they continue even now to dwell, set themselves forthwith to make long voyages by sea.”

This account provides a reliable “absolute” vs “relative” date for this event as occurring during early emigration from the Mesopotamian / Land between Two Rivers and development into distinct people groups.

“And conveying merchandise of Egypt and of Assyria…”

This confirms the above date being after Asshur separated from Nimrod at Babylon and started his Assyrian Empire.

“they arrived at other places…”

Continue reading “121) The Canaanites Kindle World War”

The Exodus has reverberated through world history”, and is such a significant biblical event, perhaps second only to creation, that it is as vehemently denied by Bible critics as creation itself.

There is no question that belief in the Exodus requires faith in an infinitely omnipotent Creator including the ability to control the triggering, timing and intensity of what could very likely have been a cascade of natural events comprising the plagues on Egypt. 

The Exodus takes up four entire books for a reason. It is the seminal redemption event that drives all the rest of human history. The circumstances proved that

• invoking the name does establish a relationship,
• and that believing in the name does grant access to power over humanly insolvable problems and even death,
• which must be acted upon in faith to achieve salvation.

For the persons who are at the least willing to consider the biblical narrative, the point I would like to drive home in this post is that the Exodus occurred to the international Commonwealth of Nations called the Hebrews, founded by Eber, Abram’s forefather, NOT the  genetic offspring of Jacob AKA Israel, nor the Nation of Israel founded by Moses at Mount Sinai after the Exodus had occurred.

“God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses…I am the God of

• thy father / Authority / Priest-King Melichizek of the children of Israel / Hebrews (Exodus 2:12-16)
• the God of Abraham “the Hebrew” (Genesis 14:13)
• the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob [from] “the land of the Hebrews” (Genesis 40:15)

I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt…the cry of the children of Israel is come unto me. I will send thee…Get thee unto Pharaoh in the morning…And thou shalt say unto him,

The LORD God of the Hebrews hath sent me unto thee, saying, Let my people go, that they may serve me. (Exodus 3, 9:1,13, 10:3)

Continue reading “SECTION XXI: Melchizedek Heads The Hebrew Commonwealth Of Nations”

When Abram was sent to the land “of Canaan” to support Melchizedek Shem at his beleaguered fortress of [Jeru]Salem it was like being sent into Mogadishu. The land surrounding Shem’s beleaguered was held by hosts of monster terrorist nations. See relevant posts for details.

“And the LORD said unto Abram…Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward: For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever…from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates…

The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.

And I will establish [NOT MAKE] my [existing] covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God / Life-Giver unto thee, and to thy seed after thee…Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.” (Genesis 13:14-15,15:18-21, 17:7-9)

This is not a new covenant of land ownership, but the continuation of the existing covenant of having dominion over the whole earth, over sin and death explicitly stated in the list of Satanically controlled nations, to everlasting life through redemption by the Seed of the Woman! This is explicitly stated by YHVH’s Savior to the Jews at Jerusalem.

“Ye are the children of the…covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed…God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.” (Acts 3:24-26)

Understand that when Abram is told he will be made the father of a great nation, he is being assigned the dangerous task of carrying forward another generation of the promised Seed of the Woman to deliver from the Seed of the Serpent, who at this time is Nimrod.

“For every battle of the warrior is with confused noise, and garments rolled in blood; but this shall be with burning and fuel of fire. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end…to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.” (Isaiah 9:5-7)

The Melchizedekian battle plan is not just, or even primarily, to save mortal life but to rescue the perishing from eternal damnation.

So why are the boundaries of land defined, if not part of a covenant? This was the time in history of the breakup of one single people into nations with Babylon as the alternate gateway to heaven from Jeru-Salem under the dominion of the Hebrew nation.

What a handicap! One nation under God against all the other nations in the world! One small piece of land from which to take dominion over the whole earth!

Abram’s rescue of the cities of the plain from the four kings provides one example of Abram living up to his responsibility to bless all nations, even enemies, by preserving, protecting and defending, and leads us into the concept of the need for a geographical base of operations to do so. 

Continue reading “125) Melchizedeks Are On The Front Line Of Battle: Abram”

The reality is that we will always blend in with whatever group with which we associate.

“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ / The Promised Seed with Belial / Satan? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols?

for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” (II Corinthians 6:14-18)

Interestingly, the phrase “come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord” is not found verbatim elsewhere in scripture. The closest quote is what the LORD said to Abram.

“Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation.” (Genesis 12:1-2)

Continue reading “117) Come Out From Among Them And Be Ye Separate”