Oddly, though, no Ubaid writing has ever been found. The languages that were spoken during the Ubaid period cannot be determined. The oldest cuneiform tablets were written in Sumerian, and that earlier pictographical tablets from the Late Uruk and Jemdet Nasr periods (3200–3000 BC) were likely written in the same language.
Sumerian simply shows up without a precursor for this pagan civilization, to the frustration of anthropologists who believe there had to be a precursor as seen in the development of Sumerian cuneiform writing.
Given the wealth of documents unearthed by archeologists without finding another language during the Ubaid period, and the fact that the ancient pagan religion at this time parallels the Hebrew Creation and Fall of Man accounts, we must conclude that Hebrew, considered by the faithful to be lashon hakodesh, the sacred language is indeed the heavenly language YHVH taught to the Adams, and through the written word and his prophets to the rest of humanity, and even, naturally, spoken by the fallen angels to communicate with mankind. How else could Mrs. Adam understand the Serpent in the garden?
Most of all, use of an alternate language would instantly mark the speaker as being NOT YHVH’s messenger.
Precisely why Sumerian was developed. Luciferianism needed its own medium.
And after the flood, Akkadian, clearly a derivative of both Hebrew and Sumerian, reflects the new paradigm. This is the language used in a small group of post-flood royal autobiographies, called naru literature, “in the name of”, i.e. as the medium of famous kings / hybrids of a bygone / preflood age. A well-known example is the Legend of Sargon of Akkad. However, Sargon goes against the tradition, identifying himself with a human father against whom he rebels and takes his place through the intervention of his mother who passes the empowering god’s spirit to him.
- Sharru-ukin, translated into Hebrew as “Sargon”, this new title means “legitimate, true king”, clearly challenging Melchizedek
- the mighty king, king of Agade / Akkad, am I.
- My mother was a changeling / secret hybrid,
- diverging from usual paternal dynastic qualification to maternal to identify himself with the Earth Mother Goddess,
- my father I knew not meaning he rejected identity with YHVH’s Melchizedek,
- The brother(s) / clan of my father loved the hills
- i.e. did not fight but fled to “The high hills are a refuge” (Psalm 104:18]
- My changeling [secretly hybrid] mother conceived me, in secret she bore me. She set me in a basket of rushes, with bitumen she sealed
- This parallel to saving Moses from Pharoah’s orders to drown the enemy’s potential soldier is patently part of the ancient practice of infanticide of unwanted or problematic children with birth defects – not a rare prototype for the Hebrews to plagiarize in the story of Moses.
- Akki, the drawer of water lifted me out…[took me] as his son (and) reared me…
- Ishtar granted me (her) love
- signifies sexual union with a goddess / female carrier of giant genes to breed post-flood hybrids.
Another autobiography of Sargon is found on a tablet of the Old Babylonian period recovered at Nippur on the pedestal of a statue erected in the temple of Enlil / Divine Lord of the Earth / ha-Adam.
- king of Akkad (city-state named after himself meaning “gathered together the people”.
- mashkim / overseer of Inanna / mother of all living / Earth Goddess Mother of hybrids, carrier of giant genes
- guda / anointed of Anu / Creator therefore Messiah / Christ (in reality the antichrist)
- en-si / lord of [all] the land [granted dominion of creation / son of God
- governor of [the line of] Enlil / Adam / Melchizedek
- king of Kish – Melchizedek’s capitol establishing his authority
We can confidently identify Sargon as Shem’s son Gilgamesh, AKA Arph-axad because of the derivative of his Akkadian language drawing from both Sumerian and Hebrew, in conjunction with timelines and exploits.
The name of Shem’s son Arph-axad is composed of two parts: “arpha” meaning “I shall fail” and “xad” meaning “gathering of the people”. As the name given to him by his father – not at birth – but to memorialize his notorious attributes, this is transparently a warning that his son would fail to defeat Melchizedek. We find this same warning prophecies some years later announced by Melchizedek Jacob / Israel.
“The sceptre shall not depart from [the current Melchizedekian designate] Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto HIM shall the gathering of the people be.” Genesis 49:10)
In flagrant defiance to his father (Luciferianism all over again!) Arphaxad dropped the “fail” part of his name and claimed as Axad, the founder of the city-state and language of Akkad, to be the ruler of the prophesied “one nation, under his god, indivisible.”.
This does not invalidate Josephus’ alternate interpretation of the meaning of the name Arpha-chshad as a combination of “extent, border; and כשד, Chesed / Kesed, the Hebrew word for Chaldeans (pronounced with a hard K, like “school” is also valid.
“Behold the land of the Chaldeans / Kasdim, this people was not till the Assyrian / Assur, Arphaxad’s brother founded it for them that dwell in the wilderness: they set up the towers thereof, they raised up the palaces thereof…Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency.” (Isaiah 23:13,19)
The earliest known mention of Babylon is as a small town, appearing on a clay tablet from 2217–2193 BC, consistent with Sargon’s early empire-building with the assistance of his architect brother Ashur. Arphaxad’s much younger cousin Nimrod seized Babel when his star ascended while aging Sargon’s fell.
Significantly, Sargon’s kingdom began not with the rebuilding of Babylon but with the rebuilding of the pre-Flood metropolis of Uruk. which, by the final phase of the pre-Flood Ubaid period was the largest urban area in the world with 40,000 residents behind walls and another 80,000–90,000 people living in its environs.
From an archeological perspective, “The [post-flood] Uruk period saw the emergence of urban life full civilization of the Early Dynastic period.” As detailed in the previous posts, “civilization” is the enslavement of the masses by the few wealthy elite by concentrating them in cities and developing not only a military but industrial complex to finance their concentrated wealth. Sargon is reported to have supported a court, i.e. standing army, of 5,400 men who “ate bread daily before him”. This is a credible number in an exponentially expanding population over Sargon’s extended lifetime.
Notice the prominence of Inanna, listed second to himself, what today we call “consort”. As “overseer” of the fruitful goddess of the earth, teeming with fertility, the ancient Mesopotamian goddess of war, love, and fertility, Sargon is controlling all the aspects of the post-flood demi-god procreation program carried by this woman in giant genetics in her ovum.
The worship of Inanna at the Eanna temple in Uruk played a crucial role in her cult. Archeologists consider Uruk / Erech to be “the first city in world history” in terms of a seattlement with a population meeting the criteria for the definition of a city, It was to this city that worshippers flocked to unite with the deity through sexual passion with her priestesses both female and transgender, and in her festivals of consecrated orgies. Exactly like San Fransisco, considered the Gay Capital of the World.
After raising an army of giants, Sargon then conquered Ur and E-Ninmar and “laid waste” the territory from Lagash to the sea, and from there went on to conquer and destroy Umma, and he collected tribute from Mari and Elam. He triumphed over 34 cities in total. Ships from Meluhha, Magan and Dilmun rode at anchor in his capital of Akkad on the Tigris River. Submitting himself to the Levantine god Dagan in exchange for his support in his territory, Sargon conquered territories of Upper Mesopotamia and the Levant, including Mari, Yarmuti (Jarmuth?) and Ibla “up to the Cedar Forest (the Amanus) and up to the Silver Mountain (Aladagh?)”, ruling from the “upper sea” (Mediterranean) to the “lower sea” (Persian Gulf).

The speed with which Sargon changed society can be matched to how quickly Shaka Zulu Changed the World.
-
In 1816, Shaka Zulu began a campaign of conquest to unite all of the clans in the region under his rule.
Shaka began with a systematic reorganization of Zulu warriors. Zulu society — much like Sparta — was entirely restructured to support the army.
In just a couple of years, his army had brutally executed, displaced or assimilated a vast territory with more than 200,000 inhabitants who became his subjects.
Like Shaka Zulu’s appearance on the scene, warfare under Sargon in Mesopotamia changed from seizing property and slave labor between neighboring clans with a minimal loss of life into total destruction of the enemy on the battlefield.

The innovative tactics and military reforms of both Shaka Zulu and Sargon welded neighboring clans into a powerful empire. So it is no surprise that “for at least 1,500 years after his death, Sargon the Great was regarded as a semi-sacred figure, the patron saint of all subsequent empires in the Mesopotamian realm”.
In truth, Arphaxad / Sargon is more accurately portrayed in gory movies than in glorifying history books.

