Kingdom Come

As the posts translating the Sumerian king list make clear, the ancient rulers were not referred to by a name given at birth but by their exploits, with the more exploits the more fame / titles. This same ancient practice is found in 4,000 years’ accumulated references to the human grantee of the covenant of dominion.

From Isaiah 42 and 61: Behold

• my servant
• mine elect / chosen one
• [the one] in whom my soul delighteth;
• [the one in whom] I have put my spirit
• [the one who] shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.
• a light of the Gentiles
• anointed [one] / Mashach / Messiah
• and so much more…

It wasn’t until 4,000 years after Creation that a human partnered up with God perfectly to qualify to take dominion.

Throughout the New Testament The Elect / Chosen One Who was granted dominion is called by the Greek term Christ as the direct translation from the Hebrew Messiah.

“And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth…

• I must work the works of him that sent me – The Creator,
• while it is day – Creativity prevails:
• the night cometh, when no man can work. – works of destruction prevail
• As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world – extension of the Light of Creation.
• When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay.” – This is Creation all over again! “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground,” (Genesis 2:7)

From I John 1:

“That which was from the beginning…the Word / Force…eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto US;

• which WE have heard,
• which WE have seen with our eyes,
• which WE have looked upon,
• and OUR hands have handled,

(For the [eternal] life was manifested [at resurrection], and WE have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you… that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ…

This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.” 

Does John really have to quote Genesis 1:1-5 to bring this connection to mind?

“If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

Because the covenant must be upheld even if one party breaks it. It is up to the stronger to rescue the weaker!

When we examine the Bible’s claims with an open mind not clouded by religious bias, we find that its thousands’ years old historical documents reliably – amongst themselves, – and validly – confirmed by other sources, give us a revelation of a hyper dimensional Being as the fundamental unified force perceived as sub-forces by humanity’s limited physical sensory and mental capacities.

Continue reading “39) May The Force Be With You”

If we are ever going to understand how the massive amount of information, documented and preserved over thousands of years by multiple authors in a variety of cultures applies to us in our culture, we must understand basic literature construction.

Theme refers to the central, deeper meaning of a written work.

Writers typically will not directly state the theme, but tease the reader to perceive and interpret it. The reason every high school English teacher struggles to pull this skill out of their students is that the process of reflecting on the theme not only leads the reader to develop a greater understanding of the work itself, but a means of grasping a better sense of the world.

Themes are recognizable by the repetition of key ideas and forces driving the plot forward from its beginning to the climax and conclusion. 

“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was / became formless and void, and darkness…And God divided the light from the darkness.” (Genesis 1:1-2)

“That which was from the beginning…is the message which we…declare unto you, that God is light / life, and in him is no darkness / destruction at all.” (John 1, I John 1).

“In the beginning” defines the start of time, which is scientifically determined to flow only into the future by the Second Law of Thermodynamics as the inevitable natural increase in disorder when no additional energy is added to a closed system.

“The law that entropy always increases holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature.”

Detractors of God’s handiwork like to claim a past tense to the word “was”, in other words, that God created a formless and void universe, allowing deep time for evolution.

This interpretation does not hold up under scrutiny. “Was” is used to denote a change in state.

“he drank of the wine [prior to being drunk], and was / came to be drunken; and he was / came to be uncovered” (Genesis 9:21)

“Esau came from the field [where while hunting with strength], and he was / came to be faint” (Genesis 25:29)

The theme of the Bible is stated in the very first sentences as “the establishment of the kingdom of God” against opposition.

Continue reading “40) “In The Beginning” Strikes A Death Knell”

“O Lucifer / Bringer of light, son of the morning…

What light is that? What morning is that? What else but when the Singularity first expressed itself in the light spectrum in Creation, “when I laid the foundations of the earth…When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy…” (Job 38:4-7)

“Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty…every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold.” (Isaiah 14:12; Ezekiel 28:12-14)

Lucifer is described not just by gold – the yellow sun we see through the earth’s atmosphere – but light refracted into its entire spectrum. We can understand this as a poetic expression of Lucifer containing the entire spectrum of immense light energy as well.

This portrayal of Lucifer’s tremendous power is confirmed by comparing his to that of the Singularity God himself.

“…behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.” (Revelation 4:2-3)

The reference to “like” an emerald is not to this gem’s color, but to its refraction.

Emeralds exhibit double refraction, meaning they refract light in two different patterns. This often causes the Emerald to exhibit two different distinct color patterns.

This could surely be seen as a reflection of the unified Father and the Son together on the throne.

Lucifer was flying high. He was as close to the image of God as any created being could be. Without a doubt he expected to God’s partner, to be put in charge of creation.

But no.

“Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife…Having the glory of God…garnished with all manner of precious stones…jasper, sapphire, chalcedony, emerald, sardonyx, sardius, chrysolyte, beryl, topaz, chrysoprasus, jacinth, amethyst, pearls.” (Revelation 21:9-24)

Continue reading “41: Pride And Prejudice”

What many readers may have missed in the list of twelve tribes’ varied inheritances was that,

• Jacob cut both of Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manassas into the 12-way split of land
• therefore Dan’s inheritance is not a blessing like the others. 

“Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward. I have waited for thy salvation, O LORD.” (Genesis 49:16-17)

The clear description of Dan as a sneaky death-dealing saboteur of his brethren is confirmed by the distinction between As + noun means ‘in the role of’ to like + noun means ‘in the same way as’.

His name was not given by Jacob, but by his mother Rachel.

“And Rachel said, Elohim hath judged me / dan-anni, and hath also heard my voice, and hath given me a son: therefore called she his name Dan.” (Genesis 30:1-6)

The King James Bible has translated “elohim” as “God” as in Almighty God”, but Rachel proved her paganism when, as she fled with Jacob back to the land of Canaan, she stole her father’s gods clearly believing they empowered her, as she did not relinquish them until forced to by her husband. 

Significantly, when Rachel applied the name Dan to her son it was KNOWN as the place-name, i.e. name of its founder, one of Canaan’s giant hybrid tribes.

“And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants…and pursued them unto Dan…the left hand of Damascus.

These geographical details are put there for a reason.

On the left of Damascus is Mount Hermon, where the pre-flood fallen angels set up base camp for invading earth to breed demigod monsters with human women (Genesis 6:1-4)

The ancient city-state of Dan was therefore a Canaanite giant stronghold along with the other giant city-states referenced in Genesis 14 at this early stage of post-flood history.

Upon entering the land of Canaan to finally take possession of the promised inheritance Moses prophesied that

“Dan is a lion’s whelp: he shall [future tense] leap from Bashan.” (Deuteronomy 33:22)

Like Jacob’s prophecy, this too reflected Dan’s inherently evil nature.

“and all Bashan, being the kingdom of Og, gave I unto the half tribe of Manasseh / Joseph’s son; all the region of Argob, with all Bashan, which was called the land of giants.” (Deuteronomy 3:12)

Dan was rejected as God’s son. In the last days his tribe is not found in Revelation 7 when “there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.” 

Instead, his twelfth portion was transferred to the tribe of Simeon who was initially scattered without any recognition in Israel (Genesis 49:5-7), but who, we must infer, like Levi, converted their fighter nature to serve God.

Dan’s choice to reject The Hebrew God is detailed in the book of Judges, a quick synopsis here:

“the Amorites [giants] forced the children of Dan into the mountain: for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley [so impoverished quality of life akin to that of the Appalachian mountain people]… yet the hand of the house of Joseph prevailed [i.e. in comparison to the Danites failure to win their battles due to their failure to trust in God.]

the tribe of the Danites sought them an inheritance to dwell in…came to Laish [outside the boundary inherited by the twelve tribes] and saw…how they dwelt careless, quiet and secure…

And there went from thence of the family of the Danites…unto mount Ephraim, and came unto the house of Micah…and fetched the carved image, the ephod, and the teraphim, and the molten image [golden calves]. And they said unto [the priest]…go with us, and be to us a father and a priest…And they…came unto Laish…and they smote them with the edge of the sword, and burnt the city with fire…set up the graven image: and Jonathan, the son of Gershom, the son of Manasseh [son of Joseph, not a Levite], he and his sons were priests to the tribe of Dan until the day of the captivity of the land.” (Judges 18)

This exactly replicates the rejection of the Hebrew God who dictates – in every sense of the word – his way to a people who didn’t want to go that way.

“the people gathered themselves together unto Aaron, and said unto him, Up, make us gods…And he…made it a molten calf: and they said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt…And they…offered burnt offerings [roasted meat], and brought peace offerings [wine]; and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to play [have an orgy]” (Exodus 32:1-6)

And again, when the northern ten tribes of Israel seceded under Jeroboam, from the tribe of Ephraim:

“the king…made two calves of gold, and said unto them…thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.” (II Kings 12:26-29)

The captivity of the northern tribes of Israel and its bordering peoples occurred when “Tiglathpileser, king of Assyria, took the northern ten tribes captive to Assyria.” (II Kings 15:29).

Dan may have been left out of this as being clearly pagan, or returned to the area.  “The Druze religion is believed to have started in Egypt. Its mystery teachingsare known only to a privileged few members. The Druze keep to themselves and even today do not allow conversion to Druze or marriage to non-Druze.

An immigrant work colleague struggling between his desire to marry an American girl and his father’s threat to permanently disown him asked for my advice, since I was steeped in the culture from my 15 year marriage to a Lebanese immigrant. I could only tell him that being disowned was a better option than the alternative – constant attacks against the wife, but one way or another it was up to him to choose birth family or an American wife, he’d never have both.

The same goes for everyone’s spiritual family. Simply being born into a certain religion doesn’t confer membership in God’s family. “Ye must be born again” by choice, giving up one’s previous identity.

“behold, the LORD cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain. In that [same] day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish 

• leviathan the piercing serpent,
• even leviathan that crooked serpent;
• and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.” (Isaiah 27:1)

Mark Twain said that the only difference between reality and fiction is that fiction needs to be credible.

So does H. P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos’ incredibility make it reality?

What is certainly reality is that Cthulhu is often referred to as Father Dagon who presides over the Deep Ones. Dagon, the fish-god who lives in the sea, is a real god of the Amorite hybrid giants,

Yep. The leader of the Reptilians in the chaos / sea of outer space, promoters of humanity’s evolution, 

Continue reading “43) Leviathan The Dragon In The Sea”

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground,..

Prepare slaughter for his children” (Isaiah 14:12, 21) 

Hesiod’s Theo-gony, i.e. gods’ origins, is the Greek version of the original Sumerian account, but is more organized, consistent with names and familiar than the older Sumerian version, so we’ll use his version to explore a parallel account since “there is no doubt that many of the features that stand out in the Theogony derive from or are parallel to myths from the Near East”.

A significant difference in the Greek version – fundamental to its influence on the Renaissance and contemporary science – is its emphasis on materialism, which posits that everything in the Universe, including consciousness, is made from or is a product of matter, Evolution is an outgrowth of materialism and is evident at the very start of Hesiod’s Theogony where the first few consolidations of specific states of being from chaos then develop into roughed out personifications and over generations into, finally, fully formed recognizable personages, majorly Zeus, born to little-known Cronus and Rhea in the green line of significant others.

Don’t frustrate yourself trying to pin down exact matches between Hesiod’s poem and the following chart. Just get the big picture.

The First Gods

• In the beginning there was only Chaos,
  • then the Abyss, But then Gaia, the Earth, came into being…
    • Earth’s first child was Ouranos / Uranus [recognizable from the Sumerian Anu and Hebrew Ani], starry Heaven. Then she gave birth to the barren, raging Sea Without any sexual love.
    • But later she slept with [her child] Ouranos and bore [multiple entities].

Continue reading “44) The Clone Wars”

It could be said that the Titanomachy was inevitable. Cronus had rebelled against his father, Uranus, cutting off his testicles with a scythe. Uranus cursed his son Cronus, telling him that one day his own children would also rebel, and win against him.

When we view this account through a biblical lens, we see a twisted version of the truth.

Cronus / Time points the big hand at Lucifer, who began the stopwatch ticking when he brought entropy / chaos / time to the originally stable creation. He rebelled against his father / authority and creator (Ur)-Ani -(s) and is credited with “cutting off the creator’s testicles” – exactly as is done with neutering male animals. This is most likely meant, even at the origination of this myth, as being symbolic of eliminating his potency / power, domination within their territory, and ability to procreate a lineage.

This corresponds biblically to the “cutting off” of YHVH’s dominus, Adam from his delegated dominion over the earth, as well as his hyperdimensional unity with God after he degraded to mortal.

So the older gods are the hyperdimensional beings commonly called angels and the “upstart” younger generation of gods are the humans, originally with hyperdimensional qualities such as immortality and ability to interact directly with purely hyperdimensional beings.

You do realize that the basic themes of any story are consistently presented throughout the entire book, right? Continue reading “45) The Clash Of The Titans”

If we base our interpretation of a creation “day” on a biblical model rather than our assumptions, we find that the creation “day” is not a spacetime quantity.  It is a quality. Right in the passage “day” is defined as a state of being of light, 

“And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.” (Genesis 1:5)\

The creation day is characterized by a condition when God is in control and personally active as the light of the world, which like the sun, energizes all life.

“the works of God should be made manifest…I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” (John 9:3-5)

The darkness / night is characterized not only by the absence of God’s presence and creative activity but active opposition to God’s work by destruction.

“God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with him [are in his presence involved in his activities], and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth.” (I John 1:5-6)

The Hindu religion has maintained ancient records out of which we can pull a more accurate spiritual perspective about the difference between mortal and immortal, time and eternal, as opposed to Western civilization’s materialistic frame of reference. According to them, the gods were immortal…subject to a different time frame and had their own periods of activity and rest. These constituted their days and nights.

The universe is thought to regenerate in cycles…Shiva destroys the universe at the end of each cycle.

When the highest Supreme Self was awake, they believed, He would expand outwardly and manifest his objective worlds…

Continue reading “SECTION VIII: Days Of Thunder”