207) How The Aryans Won The War

Darius I (c. 550–486 BCE), also known as Darius the Great, is one of the most renown historic rulers for elevating Persia – modern Iran – to the heights of imperial power. Through his administrative reforms, ambitious construction projects, and military campaigns, Darius left an enduring legacy for ambitious rulers to emulate.

On his immense tomb cut into the rock of a mountain in order to last as long as the mountain, the Persian king Darius I inscribed “I am Darius, the great king … a Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, of Aryan descent.” 

Originally the word “Aryan” meant “noble birth”. Scientists later used the term to classify a group of shared Indo-European languages originating from Persian and Sanskrit. It wasn’t until the 1800’s in the heyday of European nations’ scramble for world empires that the French diplomat Joseph Arthur de Gobineau used the term racially. After dividing humanity into three groups, the white, yellow and black races he asserted that the white, i.e. Aryan, characterized by its “immeasurably superior intelligence,” was destined to rule over the others. He also warned against “racial mixing,” as this would endanger both the quality of the Aryan original “race” and humanity as a whole.

One of the large number of scientists and academics who subsequently used Gobineau’s racial theory was British writer Houston Stewart Chamberlain in his 1899 book “The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century”, clearly in support of the world-wide British empire at that time. Kaiser Wilhelm II, in pursuit of his own empire, repeatedly invited him to his royal court, and Hitler, in turn, repeatedly refers to Chamberlain in “Mein Kampf”.

If you look at history as an investigative journalist instead of an unquestioning patriot, you’ll see that America has always shared the Aryan elitist and eugenics war agenda.

In the mid 1840’s the term “Manifest Destiny” took many a man up to calling for an unmistakable drive for American expansionism. 

In one documented example of clearing space for the mass movement of hundreds of thousands of land-hungry white settlers across Native American lands, Colonel Chivington was sent to drive the Indians out of an Indians’ camp in 1851. Most of the men, women and the children came out of their tents to surrender after Chief Black Kettle had run up the American, as well as a white flag signaling for a truce. But once the Indians were mowed down by rifle fire, the army regulars went on to desecrate the bodies of the slain.

These actions – not only allowed but encouraged by the officers – served to reinforce the concept that the current occupants of the land were subhumans.

‘In going over the battleground the next day I did not see a body of man, woman, or child but was scalped, and in many instances their bodies were mutilated in the most horrible manner…numerous instances in which men had cut out the private parts of females and stretched them over the saddle-bows and wore them over their hats while riding in the ranks. (Brown 90)

On December 29, 1890, the massacre at Wounded Knee Creek in southwestern South Dakota resulting in the deaths of more than 250, and possibly as many as 300, Native Americans became the enduring symbol of the inhumanity of U.S. government policy toward Native Americans.

The Native American genocide was the precursor to the Nazi Holocaust.

From boyhood on, Hitler devoured the Westerns of the popular German novelist Karl May. In 1928, Hitler remarked, approvingly, that white settlers in America had “gunned down the millions of redskins to a few hundred thousand.” When he spoke of Lebensraum, the German drive for “living space” in Eastern Europe, he often had America in mind.

“The relationship between the U.S. and Germany in the 1930s is very complicated and multilayered. 

In the 1930s nearly a quarter of all U.S. citizens were of German descent. The America First movement was very much a pro-Nazi movement that wanted America to remain neutral to allow Hitler ‘s success in rearming Germany, conquering Europe and then have America join an alliance with Germany.

Pro-Hitler groups like The Friends of New Germany carried out propaganda and intimidation campaigns to disseminate the National Socialist agenda. Their members wore uniforms, consisting of a white shirt and black trousers for men, topped by a black hat with a red symbol. Female attire included a white blouse and a black skirt.

In 1936, the Amerikadeutscher Volksbund, or German American Bund, was created as “an organization of patriotic Americans of German stock.” They ran camps for youth and training, eventually establishing 70 regional divisions around the nation. The Bund played into the growing “America First” stance that sought to keep the U.S. out of World War 2, while amplifying its racist messages.

A Bund parade in New York, October 30, 1939 and “Americanization” rally at Madison Square Garden in New York on February 20th, 1939 can be viewed on the Academy Award-nominated short documentary film A Night at the Garden from Field of Vision on Vimeo.

Attended by 20,000 people, the leader (Bundesführer) of the organization, Fritz Julius Kuhn (a chemical engineer by trade), spewed anti-Semitism, calling the President “Frank D. Rosenfield” while describing his New Deal as a “Jew Deal”. He referred to the U.S government as a whole as “Bolshevik-Jewish” and kept attacking the press and American culture as being run by the Jews. 

The long-controversial links between American industrialists and the rise of the Nazi regime have become clearer, thanks to recently uncovered documents. The financial and corporate sector had lots of interests in Germany. American companies like IBM [and] Coca Cola had large investments in Germany in the 1930s, and a number of them invested more heavily in Germany after Hitler came to power…”

Historical scholarship over the last decade shows that Bush was deeply enmeshed in business which was vital to the rise of Nazi Germany, and almost certainly knew that his profits were driven by slave labor…The American companies were heavily involved in German business during Hitler’s rise between 1933, when Adolf Hitler consolidated dictatorial powers…through the 1939 invasion of Poland, and even after the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the declaration of war upon Germany by the United States. Many say that the German “economic miracle” in fact was built on the slave labor of Jews, Poles, and other “undesirables” under the Nazi regime…

At one point fully 20% of the German workforce was slave labor from foreign countries, German Jews, and other “undesirables.” Often, the forced laborers were simply worked to death , to spare the expense of housing and feeding.

The Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration did not seize Prescott Bush’s assets affiliated with Thyssen, the German industrial giant, until 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. This means that between 1939, when massive numbers of Jewish and Polish slave laborers were being rounded up, and 1942, when Bush had his German assets seized, Prescott Bush was fully involved in the German economy during the worst of the slave labor regime, and profiting by it.

The ties between Hitler’s Nazis and American businessmen such as Henry Ford,Averell Harriman, and Senator Prescott Bush, the father of George HW Bush, have long been cited in lawsuits filed by Holocaust survivors seeking compensation for their suffering. The late Senator Prescott Bush’s German assets were seized in 1942 by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt under the Trading with the Enemy Act, which also carried prison penalties which Bush escaped.

When in January 1942…President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered the establishment of the War Production Board, its purpose, exactly like Nazi Germany’s, was to convert the factories of peacetime industries into  manufacturing plants for weapons and military equipment for the fight. But unlike Germany which used up the weapons themselves, America sold our weapons to Europe’s warring nations, raking in huge profits by plundering the assets of the British Empire through the Lend-Lease Act.

William Allen White, Chairman of an interventionist organization called the Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies, reassured his listeners that the point of helping Britain was to keep the United States out of the war. “If I were making a motto for [this] Committee,” he said, “it would be ‘The Yanks Are Not Coming.’”

We need to reframe America’s involvement in the European theater of WWII from heroic to self serving.

  • Between the start of the war in September 1939 and its end in August/September 1945, more than 100 million (and possibly as many as 300 million) combatants entered the fray.
  • World War II casualties in Europe:
    • the Soviet Union (20 to 27 million),
    • Germany (6 to 7.4 million),
    • Poland (5.9 to 6 million),
    • Yugoslavia (1 to 1.7 million),
    • France (600,000).
    • America (109,820)
  • Militarizing America
    • On 8 September 1939, President Roosevelt declared a limited national emergency, raising the strength of the Regular Army to 227,000. It was not until the end of the war in 1945 that operating strength reached 8.3 million – just in time to be an occupying force.
  • Militarizing the research and development and production of industry and mindset of the American people to produce massive amounts of armaments.
    • In January 1942…President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered the establishment of the War Production Board to convert the factories of peacetime industries into manufacturing plants for weapons and military equipment – to sell to the combatants – making a fortune in the process. 
    • While these weapons were publicized as being used to fight the Nazis, American powerbrokers actively supported the Nazis’ rise to power while leaning far enough to the side of the then-most powerful world agency – the British Empire – to come out on the winning side regardless of who won.

America’s liberation of the victims of Nazi Germany is lauded, but closer inspection exposes Christian America refusing to engage in the complete work of redemption – paying a high price to free another from bondage therefore making them your equal. 

On April 10, 1945, the 84th Infantry Division liberated Hannover-Ahlem concentration camp. Confronted with walking skeletons and cadavers piled in bins, many service members cried and vomited. After inspecting the squalid camp hospital filled with men he described as “catatonics,” Capt. William J. Hagood Jr., a doctor in the 335th Infantry Regiment of the 84th Division, wrote in a letter to his wife, “You have to see it — and you are so stunned, you only say it was horrible. You can’t think of adjectives…

The liberation of the camps involved more than 30 American military units…and so served as primordial architects of the survivors’ journeys from camp degradation to the postwar search for their lost humanity…

the way some liberators treated them reinforced the idea that they had become less than human...Orders were barked, compassion was nonexistent. Semprún hadn’t expected that his liberators would view him in the same way…

 
 
Credit…George Rodger/The LIFE Picture Collection, via Getty Images

Ruth Kluger encountered her first American in the town center of Straubing, Germany, after escaping Christianstadt. In her memoir, “Still Alive,” she recalled that when her mother told him they had fled a concentration camp, he put his hands over his ears, having apparently had his fill…

Some of these reactions…point to anti-Semitism, even within the most senior echelons of the military. After inspecting displaced persons camps in Germany in summer of 1945, Earl G. Harrison, a lawyer and American representative to the Intergovernmental Committee on Refugees, expressed harsh criticism of the ways Jews were treated by the Americans, claiming evidence of conditions similar to the Nazi-run concentration camps from which they had been freed. He summarized his observations by stating, “We appear to be treating the Jews as the Nazis treated them except that we do not exterminate them…”

Caucasians whether in the United States of America or Europe don’t want to be equalized with impoverished peoples from colonized lands. We want to maintain our privileged lifestyle at their expense by whatever euphemism we call economic or military oppression.

As of May 2025 – Trump’s vision for America includes mass deportations that will be so extensive that “huge camps” will be needed to detain people. To execute his vision, Trump has proposed the creation of a deportation force pulled from local police and National Guard troops volunteered by “Republican-run states.”

In other words, Trump wants an army of Republican-loyal racial purity troops and concentration camps.

As of March 2025, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates that approximately 18.6 million illegal aliens reside in the United States. This is 28 percent higher than our December 2020 estimated illegal alien population estimate of 16.8 million.[1]

The surge in illegal immigration was so large that the U.S. Census Bureau announced just three months ago it has changed its methodology for estimating the foreign-born population to account for it.

As of 2025, American population growth comes almost entirely from unsustainably high levels of immigration, both legal and illegal.

 

Leave a Reply