Kingdom Come

You probably don’t realize it, but virtually every world map you’ve ever seen is wrong.

The world maps we’re all know are drawn from the Mercator projection devised in the year 1569. This imperfect technique gave us a map that was useful for ship navigation (because it kept longitudes consistent and the angle from any point to the North Pole constant) — but also one that distorts both the size of many landmasses and the distances between them.

To correct these distortions, Tokyo-based architect and artist Hajime Narukawa created the AuthaGraph map using a complex process that essentially amounts to taking the globe and flattening it out.

And while the new AuthaGraph World Map – show above – may look strange, it is in fact the most accurate map you’ve ever seen.

This may be the most accurate map so far, but still deceptive.

Deception #1 – Hiding Antarctic’s Key Position On Earth

The politics of this – firstly- rectangular map really comes into play in the map’s configuration failure to place Antarctica in its central place in the oceans’ circulation.

“And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place,” (Genesis 1:9)

The Antarctic Circumpolar Current ACC is the only current in the global ocean to close upon itself in a circumpolar loop. in an average length reported to be 21,000 km / ~13,000 mi long.

Carrying more than 100 times as much water as all the world’s rivers combined, reaching from the ocean’s surface to its deepest bottom while transporting 130 million cubic meters of water per second, it connects the three main ocean basins to the north, thus enabling a truly global circulation. and plays a key role in regulating global climate.

Although the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) is the longest and the strongest oceanic current on the Earth and is the primary means of inter-basin exchange, it remains one of the most poorly understood 

This to explain the limited published reports? Meanwhile we’re sending back videos and analyses from the Mars Rover?

I don’t buy any of that.

Deception #2 – Reporting The Antarctic As Equal In Size To the Arctic

The most deceptive tactic of all is that when we compare the Arctic region to the Antarctic, we see that maps typically attribute about the same geographical area to each region, indicated by white as the frozen polar space.

 

But they aren’t.

“Antarctica” is a continent measuring 5.5 million square miles.

“The Arctic [Zone]” is measured at 5.5 million square miles, by using temperature as the criteria to include the frozen Arctic Ocean surrounding the magnetic North Pole plus landmass of Greenland at 836,330 sq mi), Spitsbergen (14,546 sq m) and the northern parts of Alaska, Canada, Norway, and Russia. 

However, due to seasonal temperature changes, the size of “the Arctic” changes dramatically throughout the year, reduced in half from about 5.5 to only about 2.5 million square miles at the end of the northern summer.

If we use the same criteria to accurately compare “the Arctic Zone” and “the Antarctic Zone”, including Antarctica’s surrounding sea’s solid surface of sea ice, “the Antarctic” roughly doubles to 11 million square miles, making “the Antarctic” six times the size of “the Arctic” and the third largest continent in size after Asia and Africa.

While “the Antarctic” ice also melts during the southern summer, at an even greater rate due to its larger snow-white area absorbing the sun’s rays, down to only about 1 million square miles, the continental landmass of Antarctica does not change so “the Antarctic” only reduces to about 6.5 million square miles, still about three times larger than the reduced “Arctic”.

And there are more, frankly deceptive, equivalences drawn between the Arctic and Antarctic regions.

Deception #3 – Depicting The Antarctic As Being Much Smaller Than It Really Is

As shown above, the Mercator map every school child has been raised to believe in greatly inflates the size of every country north of the equator, while the farther south we go the more the land masses are actually larger in size.

Especially Antarctic – the farthest south of all the continents.

To really understand this, we need to go back to a staple of geology: plate tectonics.

Originally, all the world’s landmass was connected, forming one super-continent known as Pangea.

At that time the proportions of land to sea were 77% land to 23% shallow sea.

Tectonic / volcanic forces broke apart the hard surface of this single continent into pieces, called plates.

These rigid plates “float” on the “mantle” below, which, as its name suggests of a cape, has a fluid movement which moves anything on top of it. Think shaking snow off your mantle before entering your home, or pulling the tablecloth out from under the dishes.

Earth’s mantle movement caused the plates to collide with one another, forming the continents as we know them today – and also reversed the proportionate amounts of land surface to water surface.

This was due to much of what had been flat(ish) land surface rising above sea level, and the sea rushing into the new open space.

Among the most dramatic and visible creations of plate-tectonic forces are the lofty Himalayas, which formed when two large landmasses, India and Eurasia, collided. The pressure of the impinging flat plates could only be relieved by thrusting skyward, contorting the collision zone, and forming the jagged Himalayan peaks.

“The Himalayas total area amounts to about 230,000 square miles stretching in length 1,550 miles from west to east, and in width from south to north between 125 and 250 miles (200 and 400 km).”

But Encyclopedia Britannica’s calculations of “square miles” only takes into consider the length and width. You’d best believe that contractors bidding on a job to pave roads don’t assume they all lay perfectly flat as shown on a two dimensional map. Any distance drawn in a straight line across a paper map of the Rocky Mountains is going to be much longer than the same straight-line distance crossing Death Valley.

Remember, tectonic forces forming these mountains originally started with much flatter plates. If we take the crumpled mess of a tablecloth out of a dryer and iron it flat it will spread out to a much greater surface area, right? We can likewise work on the crumpled mountains to determine the original flat surface area.

The Himalayas has some of the Earth’s highest peaks, including the highest, Mount Everest. More than 100 peaks exceeding elevations of 7,200 m (23,600 ft) above sea level.

Check my math. 100 x 23,600 = 2,360,000 feet = ~450 miles in height.

If we include the height of just the tallest mountains that brings us to 103,500,000 square miles of surface area for the Himalayas, or about half of an estimated total square miles of surface area of all of earth of 196,900,000 square miles.

Obviously the current calculations of the total square miles of surface area of the earth assume a flat earth surface, which EVERYONE knows is wrong.

So let’s apply the same assessment to the actual total square miles of the three-dimensional surface of Antarctica.

Radar imaging applying state of the art techniques to decades of research has revealed what Antarctica (the landmass continent) would really look like if it wasn’t covered in ice... – mountainous to the extreme.

There are actually 9,000 ft-high mountains lurking beneath 12,000 feet of ice for a total height of 21,000 feet above sea level, comparable to the tallest exposed mountain above sea level – Mount Everest at 29,000 feet. A group of scientists has mapped the most precise measurements yet of 48 million square /  i.e. two dimensional] kilometers / ~24 million square miles of the Antarctic’s) Southern Ocean showing that submerged mountains encircle all of continental Antarctica’s exposed land mass.

Including these 24 million square miles lower elevation but still mountainous underwater land mass with the 5,500,000 sq miles continent of Antarctica results in a total mountainous area of roughly 30,000,000 square miles at the South Pole. This is approximately

• 1/7 of earth’s ground area of 200 million square miles.
• and over 100 times larger than the Himalaya’ reported total area of 230,000 square miles measuring flat,

without factoring in the three-dimensional additional heights of Antarctic’s mountains, which are equivalent to the Himalayas.

Imagine you are on the beach competing to build the biggest sandcastle in a competition. You’d need to stake out a big area of flat sand to use for the spectacular height and width of your sandcastle, right?

Same thing here. The maps we have don’t account for where the tectonic forces got enough flat land to shape into Antarctica’s massive extent of mountainous terrain.

Deception #4 – Hiding Antarctica’s Connection To South America

We don’t need an advanced degree in geology to see that Antarctica’s land mass is just as much connected to South America as the Artic is connected to North America’s “surrounding land, including all of Greenland and Spitsbergen, and the northern parts of Alaska, Canada, Norway, and Russia.”

But to prove a point, those with advanced degrees in geology have determined that Antarctica and South America are indeed contiguous, sharing the same geology formed by crustal plate fragments that have been smashed together.

Ergo, West Antarctica is an extension of the north-south Cordillera Mountain Range.

So why is it not shown as such on the maps?

One fact is that the linear geological stressors forming 30 million square miles of mountains extend Antarctica’s mountainous region waaaay too much to fit on a globe.

It just can’t.

And the powers that be know it.

Just the usual conspiracy fantasy?

Deception #5 – Hiding Antarctica’s Convex Shape

The fact is that there is a very real geographical inability to force Antarctica onto a globe model which has resulted in a falsified depiction of Antarctica which is obvious to anyone who takes the time to look at it.

A convex southern hemisphere allows for the reality of the extent of geography taken up by Antarctica than currently attributed on a concave depiction on a globular earth.

1. An inverted southern hemisphere explains the north-south Cordillera Range’s known expansion into the extremely mountainous Antarctic region beyond the limits of a globe. 
2. An inverted southern hemisphere explains the fact of the total mass of Antarctic’s mountain ranges in all three dimensions – length, width and height beyond the limits of a globe.
3. An inverted southern hemisphere provides for the much larger surface area covered by the Antarctic positioned on both outside and inner diameters in contrast to its counterpart North Pole, which is much smaller.Supporting evidence that this is not a conspiracy theory but real deception, is the fact that while the AuthaGraph continental layout was only drawn in 2016, it had been drawn – with astoundingly accurately portrayed surrounding oceans 70 years earlier as the “ Official Seal and Emblem of the United Nations, Report of the Secretary-General, 15 October 1946″.

South America’s elongated northeast projection is the giveaway. 

As is 1946. The same year that Admiral Richard Byrd led Operation Highjump into Antarctica.

And Antarctica is not shown at all on the UN map. That is really odd, considering how much trouble the European Powers went through to get their hands on Antarctica.

What are the Powers That Be keeping secret from us?

I understand that I don’t have the resources to prove anything about Antarctica.

That’s not my job.

It’s the job of National Geographic and the United Nations etc. to prove what they claim is true. What I’ve done is raised doubts based on inconsistent and incompatible data provided by these sources. Any thinking person should question the veracity of these sources, especially when special interests are at stake.

The evidence is in your face – the public is being deceived as to the true shape of the earth.