Kingdom Come

Isaac Newton (1643-1727) was raised in the Anglican Church of England, which realistically simply swapped the king of England for the pope. Like Copernicus, he lost his father early in life and was raised by a relative.

And here is where any comparison ends and Isaac Newton contrasts sharply with Nicolaus Copernicus.

Sir Isaac Newton excelled in every activity in both achievements and alacrity, becoming at the young age of 24 a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, which required his commitment to taking Holy Orders within seven years of completing his MA, but which he promptly did the following year. By the law of King Charles II he was required to take a vow of celibacy and recognize the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England for advancement at Trinity College. To this he so strenuously objected that he considered ceasing his studies. Evidently, his value to the school was such that the Secretary of State for the Northern Department changed the relevant statute of Trinity College to cancel this requirement. This transparent politics of the Church of England drew Newton into his personal study of the early history of the Church. (I can personally relate to that!)

As detailed in the previous post, Newton’s ecclesial studies at Trinity College automatically included astronomy. The Copernican Revolution’s value to undergirding the authority of the Catholic Church certainly  became apparent to him, as he wrote: “When I wrote my treatise about our Systeme I had an eye upon such Principles as might work with considering men for the beliefe of a Deity and nothing can rejoyce me more than to find it useful for that purpose.” (Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica)This work limits itself to explaining how objects move in the universe.

First Law (Law of Inertia): This law states that an object at rest stays at rest, and an object in motion continues moving at a constant velocity unless acted upon by a net external force.

Second Law (F=ma): force equals mass times acceleration.

Third Law: For every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. When jumping you push backward while you leap forward, explaining everything from rocket launches to how birds fly.

Newton used these laws to explain that planets orbit around stars and moons around planets because all objects attract each other, but warned against using the law of gravity to view the universe as a mere machine, saying: “This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent Being…eternal, infinite, [and] absolutely perfect.” He wrote a number of religious tracts dealing with the literal interpretation of the Bible.

Using scientific measurements, Newton determined that the earth was an oblate spheroid, exactly as depicted by the ancient Hebrews’ understanding of the created cosmos, and has been finally -grudgingly – admitted by modern astronomy.

In 1916 Albert Einstein refined Newton’s law of universal gravitation by adding the effects of time and the determination that matter and energy were actually the same. Also known as the Theory of General Relativity, most recognizable by the scientific notation of e=mc2, where c=the speed of light squared, i.e. the element of time as infinity, this remains the accepted description of the gravitation of macroscopic (visible vs atomic level) objects in modern physics.Point being – if Newton is the foundation for Einstein, Newton must have tremendous authority.Magnetism was known from ancient times, but it was not until electricity was discovered in the early 20th century that it was determined what caused this natural force of attraction. Electrical fields are produced by stationary electrons, and all magnetic phenomena are caused by positive and negative electric charges in motion.

Rules for Magnetic Fields:

1) Magnetic field lines BEGIN only at north poles or infinity.
2) Magnetic field lines END only at south poles or infinity.
3) Magnetic field lines NEVER INTERSECT.
4) Magnetic fields are STRONGEST where field lines are closest together.

The electromagnet commonly used in various applications consists of a coil of wire wound around a core, typically made of iron or other ferromagnetic material. This model was applied to the earth.

“Its magnetic field is roughly equivalent to a powerful bar magnet positioned at the center of the Earth, accounting for 80–90% of the field in most locations.

But where is the electrical current?

“a mixture of molten iron and nickel in Earth’s outer core:‘generated by electric currents due to the motion of convection currents of these convection currents are caused by heat escaping from the core, a natural process called a geodynamo.” Wikipedia

The problem with asserting that Earth’s magnetic field extends from / begins in Earth’s interior out into space, where it deflects most of the solar wind, whose charged particles would otherwise strip away the ozone layer that protects the Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation is the recent discovery of the electrically charged Van Allen Belts surrounding earth from space. This forced geophysicists at NASA to admit that “The [earth’s] magnetic field is actually a superposition of fields (plural) from many [electrical] current sources (plural).”

Wikipedia’s – and other sites – explanation to the general public does not include this source of the earth’s magnetic field, nor the vast amount of electrical energy that produces it. The Earth receives the energy equivalent of 4 million tons of oil every second from the sun, leaving only a negligible 0.025% possibly contributed by any other mechanism.

And just as important – how do the scientists know that the center of the earth is iron?

“The core of the Earth is believed to be molten iron due to several lines of evidence”:

• Seismic Waves travel at different speeds and paths depending on the materials they move through, providing a detailed map of the Earth’s interior. 
  • S waves can travel only through solids, so the absence of S waves in earth’s outer core suggests a liquid state.
  • This is not scientific evidence, since the absence of S waves at the center of the earth could also indicate another state.
• Meteorites: The abundance of iron and nickel in meteorites, which are remnants of the early solar system, supportsthe conclusion that the core is composed of these dense elements. 
  • Again, this is not scientific evidence but a biased opinion.
• Magnetic Field: The movement of molten iron in the outer core generates the Earth’s magnetic field, which is crucial for protecting the planet from solar radiation. 
  • Whoa! Circular reasoning! Absolutely unscientific and denies the recently discovered Van Allen Belts’ production of the earth’s magnetic field as described above.
• Geodynamo: The geodynamo process, where convection currents in the outer core create electric currents, is a key factor in generating the magnetic field.
  • Another circular reasoning.

Then in 1936 Danish seismologist Inge Lehmann saw seismic P waves, which can’t pass through liquid, passing through the supposedly liquid inner core, therefore, geologists reframed the center of the earth as being a melted “outer” core and a solid “inner” core.

But wait! The seismic waves had to pass through the melted/liquid outer core to reach the solid inner core in order to be seen.

So this doesn’t make sense, but who’s going to argue about it?

Then they attributed a force that generates earth’s magnetic shield to this inner core.

“The field itself is produced by churning currents of liquid iron in the outer core, but the inner core is what keeps this system energized by crystallizing iron from the liquid outer core, releasing heat back into the surrounding liquid, driving convection that keeps the outer core in constant motion. Without this energy source, the geodynamo would gradually weaken.”

So why didn’t they factor that into their original findings, which in the long earth ages model would have eliminated the electromagnetic shield and therefore earth itself by now?

Instead, they rely on the general population’s disinterest in fact-checking to assert that  These findings,  combined  with the  study  of  seismic  waves  and  meteorites,  provide a comprehensive understanding of  the  core’s  composition and its role in Earth’s geology and magnetism, represented by a field of a magnetic dipole, as if there were an enormous bar magnet placed through the center of Earth.

42,000 years ago there was a reversal of the Earth’s magnetic poles.

The date was determined by counting New Zealand kauri trees’ rings, preserved in peat bogs. Obviously, no tree could accumulate 42,000 years’ worth of growth, so this number is made up to correspond with the long earth ages paradigm simply stated as a scientific fact in opposition to the biblical account of human history, which can be correlated to the events uncovered.

Evidence of environmental change found in caves, ice cores, and peat bogs around the world indicate that the whole world experienced a few centuries of apocalyptic conditions [consistent with Noah’s flood and aftermath]. 

Importantly, during the magnetic switch, the strength of the magnetic field plummeted to less than 6% of what it is today.

If the earth’s magnetic field is generated by the inner cores, how can that happen?

This geologically based “comprehensive understanding of earth’s magnetism” flagrantly ignores the charged electrical particles of the Van Allen Belts, the obvious explanation for earth’s magnetic field that fits the known laws of electromagnetism.

The only explanation for why the powers-that-be are covering up a truth is that it disempowers them. This practice should be readily recognized, having become so widespread and transparent in 2026 during the Iran War. Completely different versions of events are presented depending on the source – Truth Social, Fox News, or Aljazeera. Only the informed person who listens to all versions over time is able to track discrepancies and arrive at a credible deduction.And the history of astronomy allows us to recognize that the truth that disempowers the humanists and pagans is the Word of God.As detailed in the post Days of Thunder, the forms of energy attributed to “charged particles” by science’s materialistic worldview are hyperdimensional sentient beings, AKA evil spirit beings ferociously intent on opposing the Most High God and his chosen ones – human beings – given dominion over creation.

As detailed in the post The Firmament Shields The Earth From Destruction, the earth was protected from these energy / spirit beings when they were imprisoned in the abyss.

The logical conclusion that must be drawn from these opposing perspectives is that the earth is NOT a solid spheroid, but a type of oblate spheroid called a toroid, with open space in the middle. Through this central hole the external source of electrical charges / the Van Allen Belts circulate, generating the earth’s magnetic field.