- This alone defines Creator God of the Bible.
- Speed: of light is the rate that the photon will travel through any given space.
- Light is a wave, the wavelength is the distance between each peak on each photon’s wave.
- Frequency: the frequency of a wave is the number of times that the wave reaches a point or a peak in a certain time at a certain location in space. The frequency determines the color we see.
- Wave vector: the photon’s direction of propagation.
- Period: the time between two of the peaks on the wave of the photon, at a specific location.
- Wave phase: this is where two photons can interact… the wave phase is the relative location of one wave peak of one photon compared to another wave peak of another photon. This is important for if you want to describe interference.
- Spin
- Kinetic energy: due to its motion. Since a photon has no mass, its kinetic energy is actually equal to its total energy, making it much more powerful than physical objects.
- Momentum: the ability to interact and collide with other objects and actually get them to move.
- But there’s more.
-
- The Observer Effect – by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality. This strange phenomenon suggests not only that everything is energy, but that this energy responds to consciousness.
- Entanglement – once particles have interacted…they stay in partnership, even if they’re a million light-years apart. They are connected by energy that permeates everything.
- Implicate Order – everything that exists contains the information of everything else that exists.
- I want to know how God created this world…the rest are details.
- Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.
- My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.
- The path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
- Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man.
-
“The word [sonic energy] of the LORD [Infinite One] came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest…a whirlwind [kinetic energy] came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire [thermal energy] infolding itself, and a brightness [electromagnetic energy] was about it, and out of the midst thereof…came the likeness of four living [having spirit, force that animates] creatures….they had the likeness of a man…whither the spirit was to go, they went…as the appearance of a flash of lightning.” (Ezekiel 1:1-2:1)
-
The pagan geocentric worldview shares the monotheistic geocentric worldview based on Genesis chapter one, which Aristotle considered and accepted based on his scientific evaluation.
-
Aristotle believed that the planets and the Sun orbited Earth. He saw no sign that the Earth was in motion…this meant that the Earth had to be stationary, and the planets, the Sun, and the fixed dome of stars rotated around Earth. “For nearly 1,000 years, Aristotle’s view of a stationary Earth at the center of a revolving universe dominated natural philosophy, the name that scholars of the time used for studies of the physical world.
So check out the outright lie from NASA: Evolution of an Idea:
A geocentric worldview became engrained in Christian theology, making it a doctrine of religion as much as natural philosophy.”
NASA’s falsehood is clearly meant to bolster an insupportable position to lure Christians away from belief in any and all biblical authority.
-
Every religion in the world throughout history taught that the earth was the centerpiece of Creation.
-
-
A spherical revolving earth is contrary to the earth’s flat plane axis by which all astronomical calculations are projected.
Ancient religious structures throughout the world incorporate accurate astronomical knowledge.
-
Astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd. Moreover, if gravity were working on the early earth, then earth would have been bombarded out of existence by falling asteroids, meteors, comets, and other space junk…Since everything in the Universe tends to disorder according to the Second Law [of Thermodynamics], orderly orbits are impossible.
The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon’s “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are two — not one — high tides every day…
-
-
-
-
Why Is Gravity Fine Tuned?
The moment of the universe’s birth created both matter and an expanding space-time in which this matter could exist. While gravity pulled the matter together, the expansion of space drew particles of matter apart – and the further apart they drifted, the weaker their mutual attraction became.
It turns out that the struggle between these two was balanced on a knife-edge. If the expansion of space had overwhelmed the pull of gravity in the newborn universe, stars, galaxies and humans would never have been able to form. If, on the other hand, gravity had been much stronger, stars and galaxies might have formed, but they would have quickly collapsed in on themselves and each other. What’s more, the gravitational distortion of space-time would have folded up the universe in a big crunch. Our cosmic history could have been over by now.
Only the middle ground, where the expansion and the gravitational strength balance to within 1 part in 1015 at 1 second after the big bang, allows life to form. That is down to the size of the gravitational constant G, also known as Big G.
G is the least well-defined of all the constants of nature.
Does life need gravity?
Plants certainly do. Grown in space, plants show disoriented roots that don’t get the best access to nutrients and water. Poor starch production is one of a number of adverse effects of this. Some seeds grown in microgravity even produce plants in which the genes are expressed differently from normal.
Animals suffer a raft of problems if they are deprived of gravity – though we don’t yet know the whole story. “We’ve had animal life in space for half a century, but we’ve yet to have a single mammal go through its life cycle.”
In June 2024, astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were left stuck in space for 9 months. They had come prepared to stay for a long time, as “that’s what human space flight is all about. Since returning they have been under medical treatment, physiological reconditioning, and discovery of permanent damage including to the heart and brain suffered due to the time spent out of gravity.
Can we counter gravity?
Though the notion of building a gravity shield has a long history, no one has yet managed to do it… There has to be a better theory out there…
-
-
Hyperdimensions – having more dimensions than observable by humans.
Material – in philosophy, the view that everything is caused by physical processes.
The choice would seem to be obvious. The conviction that there are parts of reality that can’t be observed by human senses – like, say, things way off in the distance, or things really tiny – is intrinsic to all scientific investigation. Aristotle articulated it as the logic that ‘nothingness’ cannot “be”.
The birth of modern science is the transformation it entrained in our conception of space –the concept of empty space where ‘nothing’ can “be”, asserted by Galileo during the Renaissance in the 1600’s.
From Physics Forum online: The “fabric of space” is not made 0F anything- it is just space itself.
This is not a scientific finding. It is, obviously, impossible for science to prove the existence of nothing. This a philosophical argument deriving from humanism’s postulate that there is nothing that humans can’t perceive, ergo understand, ergo control, ergo no Higher Power than humanity.
But further scientific developments in the 1900s beginning with Albert Einstein’s quantum physics determined that what humans perceive as solid matter, i.e. mass, is due to humanity’s perceptual limitations. In reality, the atoms that form objects and substances that we call solid are actually made up of 99.99999% movement, one form of energy.
Einstein elegantly explains how energy can be perceived as solid substance in his famous mathematical sentence E=mc2, i.e.
Energy become mass when acted upon by c2 where c = the speed of light, the absolute upper limit of speed in our universe. Squaring it, i.e. multiplying it by itself cannot not realistically become meters2 per sec2 so is not a velocity but instead the crucial factor that unlocks one of the greatest secrets of the universe – the infinitely pervasive and powerful force outside the bounds of the laws of nature.
And to further confound the sciences’ neat but kindergarten level classification of reality into energy OR matter:
“The Sun, like all stars, is an enormous ball of extremely hot, largely ionized gas, shining under its own power….light and heat…light has no mass. But the fact that light has no mass does not mean that light is pure energy. Light is actually made up of objects called photons.“
Photons can exist, and be physically real, without having physical mass because they carry other scientifically verifiable properties .
A singular photon will carry these properties:
This property of energy’s ability to change a being with mass is as real as a speeding bullet or the growth observed in a teenager.
The religious implications of this new hyperdimensional science are profound, which the genius physicist Albert Einstein acknowledged.
Throughout all recorded history all peoples throughout the world have attributed consciousness and personality to invisible hyperdimensional components called gods. The consistency with which disparate cultures separated by vast expanses of time and geography incorporated astronomical observations into their religious practices establishes a basis for a real connection between heaven and earth.
A geocentric worldview was only replaced by a helio-centric / sun-centered worldview in the 16th century during the Renaissance, stated, not proven, by Copernicus in the 16th century.
“We revolve around the Sun like any other planet.” —Nicolaus Copernicus
“Of all…opinions, none may have exerted a greater effect on the human spirit than the doctrine of Copernicus. The world has scarcely become known as round and complete in itself when it was asked to waive the tremendous privilege of being the center of the universe.” —Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
So the sun-centered paradigm is frankly stated to be an anti-biblical belief for the purpose of minimizing humanity’s exalted place in the universe under the control of a supreme supernatural Force.
Still, “today the idea is wholly accepted by scientists, and is an assumed concept in many astronomical theories” despite never having been confirmed. In a recent paper published in Physical Review Letters called “A Test of the Copernican Principle,” the two researchers set out to prove the 500-year-old principle using observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)…“If our test of the Copernican principle were to fail, it [our test] would probably not be believed.”
Jumping on the Copernican bandwagon, in 1609 German mathematician Johannes Kepler Kepler developed a series of principles, now known as Kepler’s three laws, which described the behavior of planets based on their paths through space.
Whoa! Another lie to conflate the value of the statement! Kepler was developing hypotheses, NOT laws.
Their discovery was a profound step in the development of modern science. Still in use today, the mathematical equations provided accurate predictions of the planets’ movement under Copernican theory.
In 1687 Isaac Newton provided the material explanation required to replace 1) the invisible Force, i.e. God, with 2) attraction between solid objects he called “gravity”.
Sir Isaac Newton’s explanation of how stuff works was based on the [mechanical] observations that were available at his time, including the falling of objects of mass as apples on or near to the Earth’s surface. He assumed that there was a force from the Sun and the Earth and other large bodies controlling their orbits.
There is no theory of gravity that fully explains the observed effects of gravity.
The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory…For example, “the moon goes around the earth.” If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun’s gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth’s gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun.