Kingdom Come

The number of transgender-identifying youth has nearly doubled in recent years, leaving politicians, educators, medical professionals and the public at odds over what policies are best suited to protect the health and well-being of children. Parents feel lost, confused and alone as a one-sided media echo chamber repeats the lie that in order to “save” their child, they must affirm their child’s chosen gender identity.

In response, Independent Women’s Forum is releasing a new documentary series called “Identity Crisis,” which tells seven stories that the transgender movement doesn’t want the public to hear.

The videos feature four mothers whose daughters fell victim to gender ideology, two detransitioners who now warn of the harms this movement is causing, and one mental health professional who rails against her profession for prioritizing political correctness over public health.

As more individuals come to regret the damage that the gender ideology movement has caused, the stories of children, parents and detransitioners are impossible to ignore. While the media continues to block them out, Independent Women’s Forum is giving them a voice. Watch, learn, and share…

Jennifer’s daughter first identified as transgender when she was 10 years old and enrolled in an online drawing program where she was introduced to ideas of sexuality and gender. “She was trying to fit in. She was trying to have friends,” Jennifer said.

Jennifer also obtained notes from the school therapist. “At the school, they’re teaching kids to deny their own sense perceptions.”

Jennifer feels betrayed by educators, therapists, doctors, and liberal politicians whom she spent a lifetime supporting. That list includes President Joe Biden, who told parents in March that affirming their child’s transgender identity is “one of the most powerful things you can do to keep them safe and healthy.”

Everybody’s very confused about this. Because the T has purposefully been attached to LGB, which is a completely separate issue.

Children are cutting off their healthy breasts and testicles and doing things to their bodies that they can’t undo. So that is completely different. They will have to take drugs. They will probably have to have other surgeries. We don’t even know all the health consequences at this point. It’s an experiment happening right now on children.”

 A system of gender self-identification would put women at risk

The label “transgender”, and the terms “trans man” and “trans woman”, are more nebulous terms for any biologically female person who identifies as a man, and any biological male who identifies as a woman. This is a much broader category: an umbrella term including, as well as transsexuals, males who identify as women but wish to retain their male bodies, people who are “gender fluid” (identifying as women some days and men other days), and people who would previously have been known as cross-dressing men.

After thousands of years of sex-based definitions, changes are happening with a minimum of political scrutiny. Public debate about them is deliberately impeded by a toxic and authoritarian atmosphere in which serious, repeated attempts have been made to silence and sideline dissenting voices.

The allegation of transphobia is now used for anyone who dares dissent from the claims of this ideology or who supports sex-based rights. Being labelled transphobic can lead to harassment, and harm one’s reputation and career. That fear greatly affects people’s willingness to speak out. This is not healthy for democracy.

This is nothing new, just a metric of how much the Adversary’s ancient, perverted, totalitarian, gods-ruled worship system is gaining ground.

“ye are all the children of god / empowering spirit…There is neither…male nor female.” (Galatians 3:26-29, 5:18)

• As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men… 
• For he shall grow up before him…as a root out of a dry ground:
• he hath no form nor comeliness;
• and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

This section of Isaiah 52-53 is assumed to refer to Jesus’ appearance after he was beaten and crucified. Without question Jesus did display post-resurrection permanent physical wounds. But the sequence of events states that his marring occurs as he grows up. Like a misshapen root without sufficient nourishment, twisted in seeking sources of life out of a dry ground.

Since Jesus’ Y chromosome and half of his DNA was contributed by God with all its hyperdimensional power, Jesus assuredly did not look like any usual human male – neither the Europeanized version nor the anthropologist’s. Why do we assume that Jesus would not also have grown into a giant like the crossbreeds fathered by lesser gods on human mothers? We should abandon our Sunday School coloring pages to take seriously what the Bible reports about the hybridization of hyper-dimensional sons of God and human women. 

Based on a straightforward reading of the above passage in Isaiah, Jesus’ mismatch of hyperdimensional and fallen human DNA was manifested in his growing body, as happens with the medical condition acromegaly shown below. We can’t assume that there were no metabolic and hormonal disorders in Jesus’ experience manifesting mismatched Mary’s corrupted and mutated DNA with God’s hyperdimensional, regardless of its perfection. Genes take two, remember, to tango.

This explains why Mary did not recognize him after resurrection into his perfected human body, in addition to his resurrection transformation back to the human pre-fall hermaphrodite identity. 

“For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage [which is the only biblical allowance for engaging in sex], but are [complete in themselves with attributes of both sexes] as the angels of God in heaven.” (Matthew 22:30)

Put some life into reading the bare words of Mary’s encounter with the risen Jesus! Compare this exchange to that portrayed in love stories with the heights of emotional tension prior to its dissipation after engaging physically. 

“In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and [Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them] to see the sepulchre. And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow: And for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men.

And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified…go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead…And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word. And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him.” (Luke 24:10, Matthew 28:1-9)

All except Mary, who stayed behind.

Does this image show Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane or Mary at the garden tomb? Both were prepared to lay down their lives in order to defy spiritual evil. Can we see in this characterization the “superman, the Ubermensch, imagined by Friedrich Nietzsche… the superior man, who justifies the existence of the human race…not a product of long evolution but emerging when any man with superior potential completely masters himself.”

And “completely master himself” is exactly what Jesus did, and what all born again sons of God are to do – male and female – freely, not through oppression, paradoxically master ourselves by submitting ourselves to the will of the Father in society first of all, and even to physical death, because we understand it is the right thing, the only constructive thing, to do.

“Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping…and saw Yahweh’s Savior / Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus [because he was no longer crammed into a body unfit for God]

Jesus saith unto her [in a kind voice so as not to frighten her, but impersonal as indicated by the form of address he uses towards her], Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou?

No doubt Jesus’ voice is changed due to physiological changes in his throat, but it seems to me that Jesus is toying a bit with Mary, as a close friend would do.

She, [from his tone of voice not being harsh and threatening like a soldier’s] supposing him to be the gardener, [assuredly because he was physically super strong as would be necessary to wrestle stone doors], saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away.

Talk about braving death! One woman facing the Roman military tasked with keeping this unraveling fiasco under wraps!

Jesus saith unto her [now in an intimate, affectionate, half-laughing in joy and half-sobbing himself in empathy] “Mary” [it’s me, you know my voice].

She turned herself, and [in instant recognition from the intimacy of his tone of voice and a flash of insight into his teaching of resurrection] saith unto him, Rabbon-i; which is to say, My Master – MINE!”

And throws herself at him, but he steps back.

“Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father.” (John 20:11-17)

Hebrews 9 explains in detail that the process of redemption wasn’t finished until Jesus ascended into heaven to pour out his own blood. This means that Jesus himself, as the human Seed of the Woman, champion, representative of all humanity, was not yet himself in a redeemed state during his visit in the Garden with Mary. How Mary’s touch could have jeopardized the finalization of Jesus’ redemptive act can only be deduced from existing scripture.

It can’t be that she was a woman and there would have been some sexual connotation, because he had allowed the other women to touch him.

The significant difference between Mary and the other women is that she is documented as “out of whom he had cast seven devils.” (Mark 16:9) Mary’s ability to connect with spirits is also noted by the record that, unlike the other women who ran away in great fear after encountering the angels, she does the complete opposite – seeks another encounter with the angels as “she stooped down, and looked into the sepulchre, And seeth two angels in white sitting. And they say unto her…She saith unto them…” (John 20:11-13)

We can surely make a connection between Mary Magdalene’s extreme familiarity with hyperdimensional beings and Jesus preventing his power from streaming to her if she touched him. 

Until God’s Holy Spirit came in and replaced those suckers, any power streaming into Mary would be seized and used by her owners, or even others whose entry she was too weak to repulse.

“ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you…and when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all filled with the Holy Ghost.” (Acts 1:5, 2:1-4) 

“when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons [permanent members of the family, in contrast to daughters who marry into another family] And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.” (Galatians 4:4-6)

“Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.” (I John 3:1-3)