35) Earth’s Spacial Relationship

Axial precession is the movement of the rotational axis of an astronomical body, whereby the axis slowly traces out a coneEarth goes through one such complete precessional cycle in a period of approximately 26,000 years…during which the positions of stars will slowly change [relative to the earth.

Note that axial precession astronomical calculations are based on a flat, circular plane.

We know that ancient cultures’ geocentric observations accurately predicted astronomical events not only for annual cycles, but for those appearing only over vast periods of time.

Most telling of all are the ancient monumental structures used to accurately track the movements of the heavenly bodies.

In their brilliant and far-reaching study Hamlet’s Mill,Professors de Santillana and von Dechend present a formidable array of mythical and iconographic evidence to demonstrate the existence of a curious phenomenon. For some inexplicable reason, and at some unknown date, it seems that certain archaic myths from all over the world were ‘co-opted’ (no other word will really do) to serve as vehicles for a body of complex technical data concerning the precession of the equinoxes.

All these observations, accepted as accurate by today’s astronomers, were, of course, made from from earth, i.e. a geocentric perspective. It is in fact, impossible, for obvious reasons other than distance, to take these measurements at the sun, to provide a heliocentric perspective.

This means that anyone, from ancient to modern times, is both able – and forced – to take a geocentric perspective of outer space.

Hear the title of this post with a South’ren accent and you’ll understand fully what is meant.

The Earth is at the heart of God’s creation.

image

geocentric model, any theory of the structure of the solar system (or the universe) in which Earth is assumed to be at the centre of it all. The most highly developed geocentric model was that of Ptolemy of Alexandria (2nd century CE). This was generally accepted until the 16th century, after which it was superseded by heliocentric [Sun is at the center] models such as that of Nicolaus Copernicus.

That date should ring a bell.

The Renaissance and Scientific Revolution were responsible for the introduction of ideas such as a heliocentric solar system and laws of planetary motion. Many cite this era as the period during which modern science truly came to fruition, noting…Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, and Johannes Kepler.

Evolution of an Idea

“We revolve around the Sun like any other planet.” —Nicolaus Copernicus

“Of all…opinions, none may have exerted a greater effect on the human spirit than the doctrine of Copernicus.The world has scarcely become known as round and complete in itself when it was asked to waive the tremendous privilege of being the center of the universe.” —Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The Copernican principle states that the Earth is not the center of the universe, and that…we don’t occupy a special place.

First stated by Copernicus in the 16th century, today the idea is wholly accepted by scientists, and is an assumed concept in many astronomical theories.

However, as physicists Robert Caldwell of Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, and Albert Stebbins of Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, point out, the Copernican principle has never been confirmed

Let me repeat that.

THE COPERNICAN PRINCIPLE HAS NEVER BEEN CONFIRMED.

The Copernican principle is a cornerstone of most of astronomy, it is assumed without question, and plays an important role in many…cosmological models…

It is a very handy principle, since it implies that…we can just look very far away…at a distant part of the universe in the distant past.”

No surprise there. The heliocentric perspective denies a Creator.

However, Galileo himself also discounted heliocentrity when he articulated Relativity.

Galileo reasoned that if a ship [think earth] moved uniformly on the sea [upperspace with the sun, moon and stars], a sailor could not distinguish between the situations either the ship [earth] is in motion and the sea  [upper space] is at rest or the ship [earth] is at rest and the sea [upper space] is in motion.In Galileo’s view- the only motion that is measurable is the relative motion between the ship and the sea; hence the term “Relativity” was manifested first ever.

The first step is to clarify what we mean by motion. Using Cartesian co-ordinate system in three dimensions, we can characterize any location by three co-ordinates of that space point. When we say that something is moving, what we mean is that its position relative to something else is changing. That is all motion is relative. In each case a frame of reference is part of the description of the motion.

btech-sem-i-engineering-physics-u-iii-chapter-1the-special-theory-of-relativity-11-638

In other words, the claims that the earth moves and the sun stands still is just a mental frame of reference placing the observer at the sun.

But we know that can never happen.

Therefore, it is equally scientific, from a frame of reference standing on the earth, to think in terms of the earth standing still and the sun, moon and stars moving around the earth 

This is why we tell our children not to stick their arms out of the car. It doesn’t matter if our own car is moving, the car we pass is moving, or both cars are moving. Our kid is going to lose that arm.

Einstein would later further develop this concept in his massive theories of General and Special Relativity in his effort to try to understand the nature of the material universe.

The “effort to understand” is called epistemology: the philosophical study of the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge. “Along with metaphysics, logic, and ethics, it is one of the four main branches of philosophy.”

It is obvious that the nature, origin and and especially limits of human knowledge of astronomy are geocentric.

It becomes obvious that heliocentricity is Renaissance’s spiritual frame of reference honoring the gods as superior, while geocentricity is a biblical frame of reference honoring humans who were given this world as a base from which to rule all creation.

And here is where the globe model of the earth comes from.

axial_precessionThe concept of heliocentricity requires movement by the earth: both rotation around the sun, and revolution on its axis.

A spherical revolving earth was not discovered by astronomers. 

It has not been observed and in fact is contrary to the earth’s flat plane axis by which all astronomical calculations are projected.

It was called into being during the Renaissance of the gods.

Ironically, one of the most compelling reasons for a geocentric claim comes from an attempt to debunk it.

In 1987 N.F. Gier stated that the “most conclusive reason for taking the Hebrew solid heaven literally is that such a view was all over the ancient world of the time.”

True that.

d5b802cc6921d18f77b898ad51e7a8e2

Quite logically, the ancient geocentric view did NOT present a spherical revolving planet.

Mr. Gier’s deduction that a solid heaven must be unscientific because all the ancient cultures held that opinion ignores the research value of statistics. We have thousands of years of data by multiple unrelated sources scattered linguistically, culturally, and geographically over eons of time proven to have tracked astronomical observations so accurately that their astronomers could predict the future placements of the heavenly bodies.

That is substantially more evidence than the Copernican Principle has provided with all the technological advances of our one world scientific community. In fact the simplest proof of a spherical revolving earth has ever been proven by the simplest expedient of looking at it from above.

moon2012-2015

If NASA “has to” photoshop an image of the earth supposedly taken from a satellite only 350 miles above earth, how can we possibly trust any image supposedly taken from the Hubble telescope of objects reported to be millions of lightyears away?

The NASA photoshoppers don’t even bother to maintain consistency. Are they banking on our gullibility or mocking it?

earth

In a court of law an advocate don’t need to prove anything, simply show enough holes in the opposition’s story to establish doubt. NASA’s story does not hold up to scrutiny.

You are trusting in what you are told by scientists, and they don’t prove what they claim to be reality.

Forbe’s Five Impossible Facts That Would Have To Be True If the Earth Were Flat is argued from a perspective of a flat earth in an other-wise unchanged cosmology that itself has never been proven to be trueThe only reason a round earth was conceived was to make it theoretically possible to revolve around the sun in order to replace a cosmology of the celestial beings revolving around the earth.

With all the uncertainty in astronomy imposed as FACTS on the masses with any questioning being strongly opposed at the highest levels, with billions of dollars being spent on “astronomy” with absolutely no way for us taxpayers to confirm the reality of what we’ve paid for, with mounting evidence that even astronauts and rockets can’t get through the firmament of the Van Allen Belts, we really have to question what they are telling us, and why they are so adamant that we believe them.

For starters, who are they?

According to a biblical world view, they include the hyper dimensional adversaries of humanity who are circling the earth like a pack of wolves around their prey, held back only by the celestial beings put in place in the barrier firmament to guard humanity.

This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory [military power] of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.” (Ezekiel 1)

I saw the winds / spirits which turn the sky, which cause…all the stars to set…I saw the path of the angels. I perceived at the extremity of the earth the firmament of heaven above it. (Enoch 17:6-8)

This is the first law of the luminaries. The sun and the light arrive at the gates of heaven, which are on the east, and on the west of it at the western gates of heaven. I beheld the gates whence the sun goes forth; and the gates where the sun sets; In which gates also the moon rises and sets; and I beheld the conductors of the stars, among those who precede them; six gates were at the rising, and six at the setting of the sun. All these respectively, one after another, are on a level; and numerous windows are on the right and on the left sides of those gates… (Enoch 71)

After this law I beheld another law of an inferior luminary, the name of which is the moon, and the orb of which is as the orb of heaven. Its chariot, which it secretly ascends, the wind blows; and light is given to it by measure. Every month at its exit and entrance it becomes changed; and its periods are as the periods of the sun. And when in like manner its light is to exist, its light is a seventh portion from the light of the sun…(Enoch 72)

These are the leaders of the chiefs of the thousands, those which preside over all creation, and over all the stars; And the days, Uriel showed me; the angel whom the Lord of glory appointed over all the luminaries…Conductors of the days and nights: the sun, the moon, the stars, and all the ministers of heaven, which make their circuit with all the chariots of heaven.

Thus Uriel showed me twelve gates…at the extremities of the earth, through which the sun, moon, and stars, and all the works of heaven, proceed at their rising and setting. I saw likewise the chariots of heaven, running in the world above to those gates in which the stars turn, which never set. One of these is greater than all, which goes round the whole world. (Enoch 74)

Ridiculous! you say? What is ridiculous is taking a military government with known secret agencies at face value.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s