57) Genetics Proves Adam’s Paternity

This following genetic research on the male-only Y chromosome is based on the recognition that genetic variation is caused by mutations over time. This alone invalidates the hypothesis of Evolution. This study also validates the historical accuracy of the biblical account of Adam being the ancestral fathers of all humans today, and provides a second witness to the mitochondrial Eve study.

In human genetics, a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup is…defined by mutations in the…male-specific Y chromosome (called Y-DNA)…

The human Y-chromosome accumulates roughly two mutations per generation. Y-DNA haplogroups represent major branches of the Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree that share hundreds or even thousands of mutations unique to each haplogroup.[In Evolution-speak] The Y-chromosomal most recent common ancestor (informally known as…Adam) is the [male] from whom all currently living humans are descended. Y-chromosomal Adam…

The Y Chromosome Consortium (YCC) developed a system of naming major Y-DNA haplogroups with the capital letters A through T…

Haplogroups A & B are considered direct descendants of Y-chromosomal Adam, originating from 275,000 to 130,000 years ago. They continue to the present in Africa as the  Khoisan populations in the southwest and Nilotic populations toward the northeast in the Nile Valley.

Press pause.

The claim that a current population exists that has remained stable, without any mutations, for 275,000 years directly contradicts

  • the basic definition of Evolution as constantly occurring mutations,
  • and their own study defining all the rest of the groups through constantly occurring mutations.

san1-1Look at the Khoisan portrait. This population is MOST evidently assigned the earliest date of modern human evolution based, not on the scientific data, but on the model’s demand that evolution occurred in Africa where chimpanzees, the “closest” species that “evolved” into human species are found. Ergo, the oldest humans must resemble apes.

Can we not recognize the fundamental bias and ongoing racism in Evolution? This is flagrantly exhibited in the study’s use of chimpanzee DNA to determine the evolutionary stage of mankind.

The ancestral state of a Y-SNP marker is usually determined by comparison to a chimpanzee DNA sequence for the same marker (Underhill et al. 2000).

When we compare these claims to the facts we discover that this is not a scientific research study at all. This is marketing campaign for Evolution.

There are very few pathogens that infect chimpanzees without infecting humans and very few pathogens that infect humans without infecting chimpanzees,

This fact itself invalidates the assignment of human mutated genes to inheritance from evolutionary chimpanzee ancestors. Humans experience the same mutations as chimpanzees within the same time frame because of the same exposure to the same mutagens.

Since the beginning of time, viruses have been inserting their genetic material into the genomes of their hosts, tricking the cell’s machinery into making more virus. Today, our genomes are riddled with these interlopers…but many now just sit there, unable to generate additional copies of themselves. That’s because our bodies have a group of proteins that have mutated this DNA

[Researchers] focused only on changes along stretches of DNA with the APOBEC3G protein’s favorite sequence targets…found about 37,000 mutations occurring in 10,000 clusters in the chimp and human genomes that they think were caused by these proteins…

Typically, a newborn is expected to have 70 new mutations in its genome, but just one of these proteins “can introduce potentially thousands [of them]” in close proximity and in one generation…

And that’s a lot of new material.

This fact invalidates the assignment of an extremely low rate of mutations to allow calculations of a very long age of the undeniable Ancestor of All Humanity to fit with the Evolutionary model.

The burning question of “Who was Cain’s wife?” with the scoffing deduction that “she had to be his sister which is contrary to Mosaic law therefore the Bible is inconsistent therefore unreliable” turns out to be a non-issue.

Improved understanding of science proves the reliability of the ancient biblical text. The prohibition against reproducing with close relatives was put into place thousands of years after genetic mutations increased the likelihood of passing on defective genetic expression to offspring.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s