“And the LORD God said unto the serpent…I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise [smash down on] thy head [therefore destroy you].” (Genesis 3:15)
When God calls his savior “the seed of the woman,” he is obviously leaving out the fatherhood. The meaning would have been perfectly clear to his audience.
Satan and both Adams would have understood that the woman would be a single parent.
After all, single parenting was the only known form of reproduction in the entire universe at this time. God had materialized himself as a host of spiritual sons of God and two humans.
Adam and his wife were told to multiply before they ate the fruit, so they had the same asexual ability. This is how the hydra “accomplishes the feat of apparent immortality by reproducing through budding rather than mating.”
But both original humans had lost their connection to the Singularity source of omnipotent power. Without access to the omnipotent power of the Singularity Creator, it wasn’t possible for a human to destroy the more powerful Adversary.
How could that happen?
Only through a reproductive process which includes death to characteristics of the parent could the Seed of the Woman could be different in any of the parent’s characteristics.
And this is where understanding exactly what the “Seed of the Woman” means is critical to understanding the meaning of the blessing / prophecy.
The Greek word for seed is sperma, and in English we interchange the terms seed and sperm. The medical term is gamete, and includes both the sperm and egg cells, each of which have only half of the required chromosomes and must merge with the other gamete to reproduce more of themselves.
At any level of physical reproduction the essential feat is duplicating the system’s software controlling the complex functions of each of the body’s cells. We can think of
- DNA like letters,
- in ordered segments like words or computer commands, called genes
- organized in specific sequences like apps running specific functions, in chromosomes
We know, from applying scientific discoveries, that one aspect of death that occurred “in the day” that the woman ate the toxic fruit was a change in the immortality of the DNA. This occurred when the protective ends on the chromosomes carrying the DNA began degenerating. Without the telomere’s protection, duplication of DNA unravels, causing deterioration, aging and ultimately enough loss of function to result in death.
We can deduce, by applying scientific knowledge to biblical statements, that reproduction of the entire organism also changed at this time – from asexual to sexual.
This logical deduction is explicitly stated in the ancient Book of Enoch, chapter 15.
they…die. And for this reason I give men wives; so that they might sow seed in them, and so that children might be born by them, so that deeds might [continue to] be done on the Earth.
But you, formerly, (input the emotions into this word being spit out with a pause and a glare!) were spiritual, living an eternal, immortal life, for all the generations of the world. For this reason I did not arrange wives for you; because the dwelling of the spiritual ones is in Heaven.
Whether or not you believe the Book of Enoch is Spirit-inspired, written by the Enoch who was translated, or compiled years later from his original writings – as was Genesis by Moses up to thousands of years after those events – you’ve got to admit it’s this part was likely authenticated by Jesus Christ himself.
“Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures / writings, neither the power of God?
- For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.
- And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses…” (Mark 12:24-26)
One way that humans “rise from the dead” is the expression of themselves in their offspring. “You’re just like your ____.” This is due to shared traits, both physical and personality, through shared DNA.
This is one way in which Adam and Eve rise from the dead in every human child born.
The reason it is so important to understand the reproduction by cloning of the first man into woman is that a clone is genetically identical to the original DNA donor. Therefore all the genes that Eve received from Adam and passed down to all of her descendants came from, and can be identified genetically as, the original 1st human. Including the unique DNA in the mitochondria passed only in the egg cell of the mother.
But! the alert reader protests, where did genetic diversity come from to produce the vast differences seen across the world?
The Human Genome Project provides the answers.
Darwin’s mid-19th century ridiculously unscientific ideas continue, obstinately and pathetically, to be propagated despite enormous strides in scientific discoveries made in the 150 + years since.
In 1944 DNA was identified as the structure of inheritance and determined to consist of just four different molecules which always combine in the same base pairs – C with G and A with T. Like the letters of the alphabet forming words, or, more closely, the binary computer bits of 0 and 1, the DNA base pairs can be lined up in an infinite variety of sequences and numbers to form genes. Just like books are vastly different depending on the sequence and number of letters forming words, all living things are distinguished by the number and arrangements of DNA in their genes.
In 1953 the double helix nature of DNA was famously visualized, but it took the advent of highly functioning computers in the 1990’s to unravel the complete sequence of human DNA. In 2003 a rough draft of the human genome, i.e. complete set of genes to build and operate a human being, was discovered to consist of over 3 billion pairs.
Darwinists immediately claimed that the HGP provided scientific evidence for evolution because “humans are 99 percent identical to chimps.”
However, that was an unscientific propaganda stunt made when “only 28 percent of the genome had reached the finished standard” of coverage and error rate. Further scientific refinements in discoveries and analyses of the data proved this claim to be false as there is only about 95% genetic similarity between humans and chimps.
If you are thinking that 5% genetic difference still sounds significant enough to support evolution, think again. By Darwinians’ own criteria, 5% genetic difference is large, separating cats out of the same family into different subfamilies, genera, and species.
Unlike the compared cats, humans and chimps aren’t even in the same family. Our differences separate us
further back into the primate order, which, with 300 different species, is the third most diverse order of mammals.
So we see that less than 5% genetic difference can account for significant differences between humans and apes.
In any case, similarities in design does not disprove a designer. Just look at cell phones.
Humans are 99.9% genetically identical despite greater differences in appearance than cats
Then it turns out that Darwinians fail to mention that a % difference in genes turns out to be a negligible amount of the total % difference in genome, or total DNA.
By 2012 investigators learned that…
it is an astonishing fact that protein-coding sequences, which are what we mostly mean when we say “genes,” occupy only a little over 1% of the human genome. [Another] 8% of the genome is nearly all regulatory sequences, DNA that governs the behavior of the 1 percent of DNA that codes for proteins…It was a big surprise to learn that the DNA that regulates genes was eight times bigger…Our genes code for pretty much the same proteins that the genes of mice and rhinos do. What looks like huge differences between our species arise largely from differences in regulation — what point in life a particular protein-coding gene turns on or off, and in what cells.
Fortunately, we can limit ourselves to just genes to understand how humans can be so diverse and yet share the same genome.
1. There are about 20,000 genes in the human genome. These are templates for proteins that, like Legos, are the building blocks of complex physical components such as tissues, organs, nerves, neurotransmitters, hormones, etc. which ultimately define the appearance (image) and behaviors (likeness) of a unique individual.
2. However, all the genes are not active in every individual.
3. Genes always come is a set of two, even when we only need one gene for functionality. Variations of the same gene are called alleles. These provide individual diversity within common species identity.
4. Many variation genes have a dominant (indicated by capital letter) and a recessive (indicated by lower case letter) gene. Usually the recessive gene is overshadowed by the dominant gene, so a child has to inherit a complete set of recessive genes to show the recessive trait.
Adam would have been created with both dominant and recessive genes, therefore passed both types on to his wife in asexual reproduction.
5. Multiple genes (the genotype) usually work together to create the appearance (phenotype). A simple example would be eye color. It is possible to mix the brown and blue genes to produce a green-eyed child.
6. Genes can be changed through mutations which can occur from radiation damage and other chemicals introduced into the body. These changes can be passed to the offspring but do not change the species of the offspring.
7. Genes can be redundant, with multiple copies of the same gene on different chromosomes. These function like a backup generator. In the event an essential gene is damaged by disease or mutation the redundant gene can take over. Not all individuals have these redundant genes which is why some individuals succumb to conditions like radiation poisoning or cancer while others survive.
8. Genes can be locked down or unlocked through epigenetics. This is a recently discovered process in which complex molecules are formed by the cell in response to environmental or bodily conditions, such as overproduction of stress hormones. These molecules connect to the DNA in every cell, including the reproductive cells. This is how parents’ behaviors and exposures can be inherited by descendants even when the parents aren’t around to role model, or the exposure isn’t also experienced by the offspring.
It’s worthwhile understanding the process by which offspring are the same, yet different, from parents and siblings.
Chromosomes usually come in pairs. A single chromosome is referred to as N, or ha-ploid / half. A full set of two chromosomes is referred to as 2N, or diploid.
The same species-specific complete 2N set of chromosomes is in every nucleus of every cell of the body. Just one cell is needed to reproduce into another cell like itself, or into a complete organism.
In mitosis, the full set of chromosomes are duplicated and passed to the reproduced cell, producing identical offspring. This occurs
constantly in the cells of healthy tissues like skin, muscles, liver, etc.
A different process – meiosis – does not simply reproduce the chromosomes into more of the same. It adds another phase of
- shuffling the genes across the corresponding chromosome pairs,
- then splitting the 2N sets of chromosomes into 1N, exactly half of the pairs of chromosomes for that species,
- packaged into gametes – sperm or egg,
- each one different from all the other cells produced at this time because the genes were shuffled across the chromosome pairs.
Think of it like shuffling a deck of cards. Each hand is different.
Then, since only half the required genes are provided, the other half must be provided by a second parent. The mother can only provide X chromosomes. The father provides either an X or a Y chromosome. The combination of XX is a female, the combination of XY is a male.
Now when you combine the gametes from two different people, you can see how unique that individual would be.
The uniqueness of each human member of the human race is only made possible by the die-off of the many extraneous chromosomes and gametes produced during this process.
Therefore it is not possible for immortals, only mortals.
And this had unimaginable consequences for Satan who had no idea of this “new thing” that would result from causing the Woman’s death.
“…and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born…that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan…” (Revelation 12:4,9)
Satan did, in fact, destroy Eve’s first two children – by turning Cain to the dark side and inciting him to murder Abel. No doubt Satan thought, once again, that he had gotten the victory.
“And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.” (Genesis 4:25)
Remember, names signify attributes.
And here is where we encounter how valuable differences can be.
Political theory describes methods of applying organized control over a community of humans. The common assumption, portrayed in the many superhero stories, is that the key to overthrowing the oppressor is being the biggest, the strongest, the smartest, or having a unique superpower.
It is through the birth of babies, allowing change back from disconnected to connected, from weak to powerful, from mortal to immortal, from dominated to having dominion.
- “But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise;
- and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
- And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen,
- yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:” (I Corinthians 1:27-18)
Hannah Arendt, the foremost political philosopher of the 20th century, based her radical theories on personal experience of the rise and fall of Nazi Germany. According to this secular philosopher, natality – the opportunity for a new beginning through birth – is the condition that triumphs over the evil empire.
Due to their own newness in the world they are born into, humans are both “new beginnings” themselves and are capable of making them by initiating action…This capacity of making new beginnings in the world is the fundamental human capacity to be free – a capacity possessed by each and every individual.
And all of humanity, at every moment in time, holds innumerable potential Deliverers. At any moment of need one individual out of millions has just what it takes to rise above the madding crowd, providing leadership for masses of disparate individuals, each contributing unique skills and resources into one new political identity.
This concept is illustrated perfectly in the thought provoking novel Making History by Stephen Fry. After a physicist travels back in time to WWI to assassinate Adolf Hitler in the trenches before he can develop his malignant ideas that start WWII, he travels back to his own time to discover he simply unleashed an even worse Nazi who conquered the world.
The idea of a hero inspiring a mass movement to save entire people groups seems to be inherent in the human psyche. This universal theme underlies the most captivating stories across time and cultures. The Star Wars series not only runs on this theme but also incorporates the concept of natality. (Spoiler alert!)
- Episode I – III: Anakin Skywalker is believed to be the Chosen One who would bring balance to the orce, therefore peace and prosperity to the galaxy. However, like Cain, he is seduced by the dark side, transforms into Darth Vader and plunges the galaxy into an era of death and destruction under the control of the evil Empire.
- Rogue One: Jyn Erso, like Abram under Nimrod, risks her life to free mankind from enslavement to the evil Empire.
- Episode IV – VI: Luke Skywalker leads the rebellion that ends the evil Empire’s tyrannical rule, and through love leads his father / war lord of the opposition back to the Force of light and life. Luke would be the parallel to Jesus Christ, with the Apostle Paul representing Darth Vader..
- The Force Awakens – The Last Jedi: Rey brings new hope to a galaxy once again on the brink of war. This parallels Christ’s Second Coming.
A myriad of spin-off Chosen Ones draws literary inspiration from the biblical prophesied child to come. Notice how his birth is presented in the political context of war and peace.
“For every battle of the warrior is with confused noise, and garments rolled in blood; but this shall be with burning and fuel of fire. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase / expansion of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.” (Isaiah 9:5-7)
The Adversary learned this lesson. He uses infanticide for the purpose of maintaining control over enslaved peoples.
“Now there arose up a new king over Egypt…And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we: Come on, let us deal wisely with them…And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah: And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him:” (Exodus 1:8-16)
Abortion is legal in Israel up until the moment of birth, and girls under 17 do not need parental consent….An estimated 2 million Israeli children have been aborted since Israel’s founding in 1948. The country has a population of 8 million…. The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), whose mission is to ‘defend life and family at international institutions and to publicize the debate,’ had nothing to say. The same was true for National Right to Life, Priests for Life, the American Life League and most others….
Interesting when one considers that the holocaust of 6 million Jews is memorialized by this same nation, which was founded to prevent another holocaust.
But the recognition that natality – new life – is only made possible by death is explicitly understood on a macro scale by racist government as well as a micro level by parents who make the choice to kill their unborn baby for the purpose of improving their financial, social and professional wellbeing.
The early 20th century eugenics program – which the Nazis learned from American social scientists – socially sanctioned killing of groups that drain limited financial resources through government funding of mental institutionalization or health care for incurable physical illnesses. The threat of diluting perceived genetic superiority through mixed breeding was forbidden. The eugenics marketing campaign clearly does not consider every one in society to be part of “us”.
However, scientific research on the male-only Y chromosome has validated the historical accuracy of the biblical account of Adam being the ancestral fathers of all humans today, with a subsequent branching of the family three through Noah’s three sons.
Note: according to the biblical account,
- the first human’s genes were transferred intact through cloning to his partner,
- who was not a mother until the death process degenerated one of the genes into the a unique sex gene – the female X we see today.
- The original human’s genes were likewise shaped into a sex gene – the Y – by his choice to join his partner in death.
- Without any other information provided on the other genes in the human genome, we can only proceed on the assumption that the other genes were equally transformed in both individuals.
This assumption is supported by the same process in both sexes of telomere loss resulting in death, and by the sharing of all the other genes in both sexes through the process of meiosis.
Therefore, we can conclude that the genetically transformed Adam and Eve continued to share an identical genome, other than the sex determining genes. This means that the results of the human Y-chromosome haplogroup applies equally to all members of humanity, male or female.
In human genetics, a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup is…defined by mutations in the…male-specific Y chromosome (called Y-DNA)…
The human Y-chromosome accumulates roughly two mutations per generation. Y-DNA haplogroups represent major branches of the Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree that share hundreds or even thousands of mutations unique to each haplogroup.[In Evolution-speak] The Y-chromosomal most recent common ancestor (informally known as…Adam) is the [male] from whom all currently living humans are descended. Y-chromosomal Adam…
The Y Chromosome Consortium (YCC) developed a system of naming major Y-DNA haplogroups with the capital letters A through T…
Haplogroups A & B are considered direct descendants of Y-chromosomal Adam, originating from 275,000 to 130,000 years ago. They continue to the present in Africa as the Khoisan populations in the southwest and Nilotic populations toward the northeast in the Nile Valley.
The claim that a current population exists that has remained stable, without any mutations, for 275,000 years directly contradicts
- the basic definition of Evolution as constantly occurring mutations,
- and their own study defining all the rest of the groups through constantly occurring mutations.
Look at the Khoisan portrait. This population is MOST evidently assigned the earliest date of modern human evolution based, not on the scientific data, but on the model’s demand that evolution occurred in Africa where chimpanzees, the “closest” species that “evolved” into human species are found. Ergo, the oldest humans must resemble apes.
Can we not recognize the fundamental bias and ongoing racism in Evolution? This is flagrantly exhibited in the study’s use of chimpanzee DNA to determine the evolutionary stage of mankind.
The ancestral state of a Y-SNP marker is usually determined by comparison to a chimpanzee DNA sequence for the same marker (Underhill et al. 2000).
When we compare these claims to the facts we discover that this is not a scientific research study at all. This is marketing campaign for Evolution.
This fact invalidates the assignment of human mutated genes to inheritance from evolutionary chimpanzee ancestors. Humans experience the same mutations as chimpanzees within the same time frame because of the same exposure to the same mutagens.
Since the beginning of time, viruses have been inserting their genetic material into the genomes of their hosts, tricking the cell’s machinery into making more virus. Today, our genomes are riddled with these interlopers…but many now just sit there, unable to generate additional copies of themselves. That’s because our bodies have a group of proteins that have mutated this DNA…
[Researchers] focused only on changes along stretches of DNA with the APOBEC3G protein’s favorite sequence targets…found about 37,000 mutations occurring in 10,000 clusters in the chimp and human genomes that they think were caused by these proteins…
Typically, a newborn is expected to have 70 new mutations in its genome, but just one of these proteins “can introduce potentially thousands [of them]” in close proximity and in one generation…
And that’s a lot of new material.
This fact invalidates the assignment of an extremely low rate of mutations to allow calculations of a very long age of the undeniable Ancestor of All Humanity to fit with the Evolutionary model.
The burning question of “Who was Cain’s wife?” with the scoffing deduction that “she had to be his sister which is contrary to Mosaic law therefore the Bible is inconsistent therefore unreliable” turns out to be a non-issue.
Improved understanding of science proves the reliability of the ancient biblical text. The prohibition against reproducing with close relatives was put into place thousands of years after genetic mutations increased the likelihood of passing on defective genetic expression to offspring.
What about the woman? Biblically, her disconnect is what caused death to come upon all her offspring.
“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children;” (Genesis 3:16)
This verse has been interpreted as God’s punishment on Eve through painful childbirth.
Our interpretation of why the woman suffers in childbearing is based on our impression of God. Is he a tyrant who brutally punishes slaves who displease him, or a loving, faithful, trustworthy father who patiently guides and disciplines his children through their free-will chosen experiences for their safety, character development, personal insight, maturation and ultimate empowerment?
Humans were given authority to make things happen. Our actions trigger irretrievable reactions. What we do really and truly reverberates through our universe and impacts our world – for good or bad. We are not action figures for God to pick up and reposition when we fall. For him to do so would take away our power, our autonomy, our ability to be free individuals and meaningful change agents.
We reality-based consequences in the physics dimension, but not so much in the spirit dimension. If we did, we would recognize God’s faithfulness, love, mercy and forgiveness toward the woman whose sin rocked the whole universe.
The man’s decision to eat the fruit was not based on defiance of God. He chose to join her out of love and obedience to God’s command not to leave her, in full knowledge that he was sacrificing himself for her.
Therefore it was the woman’s responsibility to make things right. And God gave her that opportunity.
We should be amazed at the trust the Creator continues to put in humanity after the woman blew it.
“I will put enmity between thee [the serpent] and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall brush [smash down on] thy head.” (Genesis 3:15)
The person responsible for dealing death is who God partnered with in redemption.
The real shocker here is not that God fathered his son, but that a mortal, imperfect human partnered in the creation of that being.
“behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Yeshua / YHVH’s Savior…the Son of the Highest…The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God…As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: That we should be saved from our enemies.” (Luke 1:26-72)
To be allowed to partner with the Singularity in redeeming her children is not a curse. It is a blessing.
The exact way the woman provided corrective action for causing death to come on all mankind is by – what else? – the equal and opposite reaction.
The woman gives life to all humanity in her seed / egg cell.
“And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.” (Genesis 3:20)
Wow. How straightforward a solution is that?
Christianity typically type-casts Jesus Christ as The Seed of The Woman, and he certainly is in terms of the promised destroyer of the Serpent / Sin.
But we shouldn’t overlook the fact that ALL humans are also The Seed of The Woman, therefore in a position to be identified with the Promised Deliverer / Messiah / Christ.
The most prominent roles of mitochondria are to produce the energy currency of the cell…and to regulate cellular metabolism…However, the mitochondrion has many other functions…
its DNA uses a different code from the DNA in the nuclei of the cells of the body…Inherited only from the mother through the egg cell, the father’s sperm does not contribute its mitochondria…
This allows DNA analysis which has scientifically determined there is a mitochondrial Eve, the ancestor of all human beings.
Even science has determined (to its chagrin) that every living person can be traced back to one original ancestress through the unique set of genes found – not in the cell’s nucleus but – only in the cell’s mitochondria, and passed down intact to every offspring in the maternal egg. None of the male’s mitochondria are merged into the fertilized egg.
Through analysis of mitochondrial DNA obtained from females of various ethnic backgrounds, researchers have determined that all humans alive today descended from one female, commonly referred to as ‘Eve’,
So pure scientific evidence supports the biblical account of the mother of all humanity.
who lived approximately 7600 generations ago.”
We already know the false assumptions imposed to calculate this time frame by Evolutionists through the above review of the Y-chromosome.
Wilson felt uneasy about using the term “Eve” because it caused many to think that she was the only woman living at that time, much like what is written in Genesis of the Bible concerning Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden…the usual evolutionary time-scale for man did not allow such a short time as 200,000 years. Rather, it is believed that man has been around for a much longer period of time.
Another assumption factored into this mathematical formula deriving 200,000 years from 7600 generations is that each generation is separated by 25 years.
- This anthropological allocation is inconsistent with the other social sciences which assign only 10 years to each generation for study purposes.
- Furthermore, it is common knowledge that new generations are born every single day to different families
- Generations can even leapfrog over each other within the same family.
So this accounting system is patently rigged. This is clearly done to avoid matching the results of this study with the biblical account of creation.
Any person with some knowledge of how to conduct a scientific study should be able to recognize at this early point in the presentation that
- Perdue University starts with researcher bias,
- rejects out of hand any hard data from ancient Hebrew documents preserved for thousands of years,
- and inputs unprovable assumptions to remain consistent with its a priori “theory” of evolution.
It is unprovable by science’s own standards, but is in fact simply one of many religious belief systems from which people seek self-empowerment.
Evolutionists have come to believe that Eve must have been one of many women of her time, in a genetic bottleneck.
The story of the mitochondrial Eve is not what paleoanthropologists wanted to hear.[So much for scientific objectivity.] They did believe that man came from Africa, but they believed it happened one million years ago.
So, there seems to be no way for all the data to presently fit together.
Ten years on from the finishing of the human reference genome sequence, it remains unclear what fraction of the human genome confers function, where this sequence resides, and how much is shared with other mammalian species...
Nearly 99% of the human genome does not encode proteins [definition of a gene], and while there recently has been extensive biochemical annotation of the remaining noncoding fraction, it remains unclear whether or not the bulk of these DNA sequences have important functional roles.
The mysterious apparent lack of functionality of the vast majority of the human genome supports the biblical view that the man Adam
- was created perfectly in God’s hyper dimensional image and likeness,
- was corrupted into a vastly less functional four dimensional state of being,
- but retained the capacity
- to be resurrected back into the original hyper dimensional state of being.
The one thing we can state with certainty is that the data shows we all share one common family tree, with not only “Eve” by any name but also “Adam” by any name reproducing themselves in all humanity living today. The data also validates the biblical record that all humanity living now descended from parents whose original genetic state greatly degenerated, not evolved.