23) Days Of Thunder

  • Day One: 

    “In the beginning God created the heaven [singular] and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)

    Night One:

    “And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.” (Genesis 1:1-2)

    The book of Job internally confirms the translation that “was” means “came to be” formless at the beginning of creation.

    1. gary-jackson-stamping-flowerpot-1024x768“when I laid the foundations of the earth
    2. the sea…brake forth…
    3. the earth…is turned as clay to the seal; [soft and wet] (Job 38:4-14)

    Peter references a flood in the context of “the beginning of the creation,” so this is not the flood of Noah.

“…there shall come in the last days scoffers…saying…all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished...” (II Peter 3:3-7)

World-wide sedimentary layers matching borders across continents provide geological evidence of a series of world-wide floods prior to the breaking up of Pangea, the original single landmass.


The ancients understood what was going on.

Cronus / Lucifer seized power from his father Ur-anu-s / YHVH and ruled the cosmos with the Titans as his subordinates…

  • Thy way and thy doings have procured these things unto thee; this is thy wickedness
  • rebellion against me, saith the LORD / YHVH / Creator
  • I cannot hold my peace, because thou hast heard, O my soul, the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war.
  • Destruction upon destruction is cried; for the whole land is spoiled:
  • suddenly are my tents spoiled, and my curtains in a moment.
    1. I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.”
    2. I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved
    3. I beheld, and, lo, there was no man [ha Adam, referring to human], and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
    4. I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness,
       (Jeremiah 4:4-26)

It is argued by well intentioned stout believers in biblical Creation that, despite the repetition of circumstances even word for word, Jeremiah’s prophecy doesn’t apply to the events of Creation.

This passage has been used by supporters of the gap theory to support their positiongap theorists conclude that this must refer to some cataclysm that overcame the world after Genesis 1:1. However, context is the key to understanding. Jeremiah 4 describes the impending destruction of Judah because of Judah’s disbelief.

This analysis is so focused on denying long ages for the earth that it ignores the fundamental construction of any and every literary work.

Literary devices.

theme refers to the central, deeper meaning of a written work. Writers typically will convey the theme of their work, and allow the reader to perceive and interpret it, rather than overtly or directly state the theme. As readers infer, reflect, and analyze a literary theme, they develop a greater understanding of the work itself and can apply this understanding beyond the literary work as a means of grasping a better sense of the world. Theme is often what creates a memorable and significant experience of a literary work for the reader.

Sometimes it can be difficult to determine the difference between the theme and subject matter of a literary work. They are both closely related to each other; however, the subject matter is the topic that is overtly addressed and presented by the writer whereas the theme is the meaning or underlying message that is imparted through the writing.

The subject matter of a written work is what the text is about and is, typically, clearly indicated by the writer. The theme of a literary work reflects why it was written and what the author hopes to convey on a deeper level to the reader without direct statements. A reader may infer and a writer may imply a theme within a literary work. However, the subject matter of a literary work is not inferred by the reader or implied by the writer; it is overtly stated and understood.

The difference between the subject matter of Genesis 1 and Jeremiah 4 is:

  1. the Singularity’s Creation and salvaging of the universe after rebellion by his celestial offspring
    1. These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens” (Genesis 2:1-4)
    2. Whoa! There’s a clue! Generation = “a form, type, class, etc., of objects existing at the same time and having many similarities or developed from a common model or ancestor (often used in combination): a new generation of anticancer drugs; a third-generation phone.”
  2. and the Singularity Creator’s offer of salvation from destruction rebellion by his human offspring.
    1. If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the LORD, return unto me: and if thou wilt put away thine abominations out of my sight, then shalt thou not removelest my fury come forth like fire, and burn that none can quench it, because of the evil of your doings…Blow ye the trumpet in the land: cry, gather together, and say, Assemble yourselves…Set up the standard toward Zion: retire, stay not: for I will bring evil from the north, and a great destruction…The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer…he is gone forth from his place to make thy land desolate…without an inhabitant.

The theme, however, necessarily remains the same: “the establishment of the kingdom of God”. The theme is recognizable despite the change of scenery and actors by the repetition of key ideas and forces driving the plot forward to the climax and conclusion.

The plot is rebellion against Creator / YHVH / LORD.

watchers come from a far country, and give out their voice...because she hath been rebellious against me, saith the LORDThy way and thy doings have procured these things unto thee…my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children / sons of God / angels and human and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.” (Jeremiah 4:16-25) 

When we read these Bible passages through the lens of energy consumption and conservation we recognize that God is not arbitrarily lashing out a punishment because he is offended. He is bewailing the inevitable consequences of actions taken by beings who were granted freedom to act.

The Enuma Elise validates the Bible’s report that God did not create a dark, formless, void universe and elucidates what the Hebrew text takes for granted.

Enki / Lucifer attacked the earth with waters as the forces of destruction. “Then the lord raised up the flood-storm, his mighty weapon.”


Be forewarned! Rebellion is invariably unsuccessful, resulting in destruction of the rebels. As one would naturally expect, since the infinite Singularity has an inexhaustible supply of energy / weaponry.

In other words: construction during evening – destruction during night – reconstruction during morning.

Morning – That’s a wrap!

Day One ends with victory against the forces of destruction.

“Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring [Lucifer] to know his placefrom the wicked their light [energy, ability to act] is withholden, and the high arm shall be brokenHast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth? Have the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors of the shadow of death?” (Job 38:11-17)

“And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.” (Genesis 1:5)

Singularity Energy God intervenes to minimize the damage that can be caused by consequences of entropy running riot into chaos, using a variety of energy forces.

“And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.” (Genesis 1:3) 

“who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb?…And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors, And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?” (Job 38:8-10) 

“Hear attentively the noise of his voice, and the sound that goeth out of his mouth. He directeth it under the whole heaven, and his lightning unto the ends of the earth. After it a voice roareth: he thundereth with the voice of his excellency; and he will not stay them when his voice is heard. God thundereth marvellously with his voice; great things doeth he, which we cannot comprehendBy the breath of God frost is given: and the breadth of the waters is straitened.” (Job 37:3-10) 

port_lockroy_antarctica_on_a_summer_evening.jpgPhoto of Antarctica, where in a complete circle the breadth of the waters / oceans are straitened (con-strained from taking action as by a strait jacket) by a wall of frost / ice.

Hast thou entered into the treasures [stores] of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures [stores] of the hail, Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war?…Out of whose womb came the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who hath gendered it? The waters are hid as with a stone, and the face of the deep is frozen” (Job 38)

Job’s sparse biblical account of ice used as a weapon was very likely written during a retreating ice age so understood without requiring explanation by his readers. For us later readers, Job account of creative eras followed by destructive forces is validated by geology.


iceaage-3There is geological evidence of ice ages. The main evidence for glaciation is from particularly characteristic sediments which are formed by glaciers, and they’re preserved in the geological record…

The most recent glaciation is the one we are living in now…

There have been at least five significant ice ages in Earth’s history…

One significant outcome of the recent ice age was the development of Homo sapiens…[Interesting correlation with Day 6.]

Bear in mind, once “time” is defined as a measure of destruction then we must acknowledge that time did pass during the nights of Genesis 1.

But since time is a measure of destruction, this time cannot be used to support Evolution.

Evening – Beginning Day 2, establishing defenses

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven.” (Genesis 1:4-5)

The Hebrew noun for firm-ament, raqia רָקִיעַ, comes from the root verb raqa רָקַע which means “to stamp, hammer or beat out, indicating a solid, or at least impenetrable, vault over the earth.

4d793a62a3b0f6d24f922c810899d5ce_largeJob’s account of creation, which gives us much more detail, solidifies (that’s a pun) this interpretation of a hard firmament.

“Has thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten [metalic] looking glass?” (Job 37:18)

Even modern glass mirrors reflect via a coating of silver.

Night: Opposition from the forces of destruction faced and defeated.

Note that the text documents that God made this project. In the context of the hyper dimensional battle going on at this time, one way God could have made an impenetrable wall firmament is by lining up a defensive shield wall. Maybe the Romans got the idea from their gods.


Interesting that the Enuma Elish also reports this action.

Marduk / Zeus is Enki’s / Lucifer’s son, who leads the rebellion for his father and, like his father, claims the victory, and the creation of the firmament for himself. More on this later, for now just focus on the description of the formation of the firmament and its lights.

Marduk strengthened his hold on the vanquished gods [rallied the discouraged losers to get back in the game], And turned back to Tiamat [swirling chaos, source of energy] whom he had bound [constrained like a nuclear bomb]He split her like a shellfish into two parts: Half of her he sat up as the ceiling [firmament] of the sky [solid, the other half remaining energy], He pulled down the bar [locked it closed] and posted guards [obviously to prevent entrance of created creatures from outer space]


While falsely attributing the kingdom, the power and the glory to YHVH’s adversary, the Enuma Elis nonetheless validates the event described in the Bible.

”Dead things [disconnected from life but not inactive, like vampires] are formed from under the waters [Tiamat, sea of outer space], and the inhabitants thereof…He divideth the sea with his power, and by his understanding he smiteth through the proud. By his spirit [energy] he hath garnished the heavens;” (Job 26:5-13)

With our current knowledge of physics we can understand the firmament is an impenetrable forcefield, described as wind energy in ancient literature and recently validated by the astronomical discovery.

The Van Allen Belts, made by the plasma / matter and wind / energy from the sun is a match for the Enuma Elis’ report of splitting of Tiamat like a shellfish into two parts – converting some to matter / plasma and leaving some as wind / energy.

“I saw how the winds stretch out the vaults of heaven, and have their station between heaven and earth: these are the pillars of the heaven” (Enoch 18:3)


Two donuts of seething radiation that surround Earth, called the Van Allen radiation belts, have been found to contain a nearly impenetrable barrier...a collection of charged particles, gathered in place by Earth’s magnetic field…in response to incoming energy from the sun…

“When you look at really energetic electrons, they can only come to within a certain distance from Earth…”

The team looked at possible causes… the presence of other space particles…appears to be a more likely cause…

Ironically, in 1987 N.F. Gier attempted to debunk a literal interpretation of the Bible in favor of the scientific positions at that time. He stated that the “most conclusive reason for taking the Hebrew solid heaven literally is that such a view was all over the ancient world of the time.”

There are two analytical flaws with his conclusion.

First, the scientific positions Gier was attempting to support have since been discarded by scientists themselves as science gathered more data.

Second, his conclusion that the ancient worldview was unscientific, ergo false, ignores the research value of reliability. How could such humanly unobtainable astronomical knowledge be learned by societies all over the Earth if not from a common source validated by observable evidence?


How does he explain ancient civilizations’ knowledge of the relative movement between the earth and heavenly bodies, encoded in monumental structures and momentous mythology?

“I saw the winds which turn the sky, which cause…all the stars to set…I saw the path of the angels. I perceived at the extremity of the earth the firmament of heaven above it.” (Enoch 17:6-8)

Axial precession is the movement of the rotational axis of an astronomical body, whereby the axis slowly traces out a coneEarth goes through one such complete precessional cycle in a period of approximately 26,000 years…during which the positions of stars will slowly change [relative to the earth].


Note that this geometrical calculation is based on a two-dimensional plane, not a three-dimensional ball.
And that’s another conundrum, since all ancient astronomically advanced cultures from around the world presented the earth as a disc.

The the pervasiveness of the ancient view of the firmament does indicate a common source, which all do claim to be divine revelation, validating the biblical account.

The same scientific principle that is used to establish the model of our solar system also disproves it.

…a fully developed helio [sun] centric model was developed by Aristarchus of Samos in the 3rd century BC, [but] these ideas were not successful in replacing the view of a static…Earth, and from the 2nd century AD the predominant model, which would be inherited by medieval astronomy, was the geo [earth] centric model described in Ptolemy‘s Almagest.

The Ptolemaic system was a sophisticated astronomical system that managed to calculate the positions for the planets to a fair degree of accuracy. Ptolemy himself, in his Almagest, points out that any model for describing the motions of the planets / [astronomical bodies] is merely a mathematical device, and since there is no actual way to know which is true, the simplest model that gets the right numbers should be used.

Galileo himself, the 17th century astronomer famous for popularizing heliocentricity, also discounted heliocentrity when he articulated Relativity.

Galileo reasoned that if a ship [think earth] moved uniformly on the sea [upperspace with the sun, moon and stars], a sailor could not distinguish between the situations either the ship [earth] is in motion and the sea  [upper space] is at rest or the ship [earth] is at rest and the sea [upper space] is in motion. In Galileo’s view- the only motion that is measurable is the relative motion between the ship and the sea; hence the term “Relativity” was manifested first ever.

The first step is to clarify what we mean by motion. Using Cartesian co-ordinate system in three dimensions, we can characterize any location by three co-ordinates of that space point. When we say that something is moving, what we mean is that its position relative to something else is changing. That is all motion is relative. In each case a frame of reference is part of the description of the motion.


In other words, the claims that the earth moves and the sun stands still is just a mental frame of reference placing the observer at the sun. It becomes obvious that heliocentricity is a spiritual frame of reference honoring the sun god, while geocentricity honors the Son of God who was given this world as a home base from which to rule all creation.

It is scientifically equally valid to claim that the earth stands still and the sun, moon and stars move around the earth from a frame of reference standing on the earth. This is why we tell our children not to stick their arms out of the car. It doesn’t matter if our own car is moving, the car we pass is moving, or both cars are moving. Our kid is going to lose that arm.

Einstein would later further develop this concept in his massive theories of General and Special Relativity in his effort to try to understand the nature of the material universe.

The following excerpt from the blog Spontaneous Evolution is from a man who is the antithesis of a Bible believer, as in “I love the Goddess.” And yet his perspective on the Flat Earth movement, which may well be antithetical to his world view, bears contrasting with the typical Christian’s – and Evolutionist’s – refusal to question what they are told by their leaders.

My most fascinating observations around the Flat Earth theory:

we are conditioned to move with the herd…These movements, like the conspiracy movement is forcing people to investigate for themselves. Even if they find warped evidence, or arrive at incorrect conclusions, I still think the point is people are asking questions, and I would imagine over time their skills of analysis and research would greatly improve. One learns nothing by simply being spoon fed information.

Blind defense of the globe model: 99.99% of people who read this will not be able to prove it’s round. They can refer to NASA or pictures in school books but do not personally have the skills to prove we live on a globe…Why do we defend an idea or strangers we have no direct investment in? We are terrified of having our safe comfortable view of the world challenged…Unlike other conspiracies this is the first time that I notice the conspiracy side, the flat earthers calmer and better researched by far, than the round earthers.

Most importantly: I also see these Flat Earthers as potentially an early indication of who are coming of age on this planet ehhhhh or plane…Will the next generation be awake enough to realise that they are responsible for their own lives, their money, their health and most crucially their education? A critical thinking population will analyse and assess every subject thrown at it, that may mean subjects you consider wacky and a waste of time, it may also mean subjects you may consider of the utmost importance. Put the subject of the flat earth to one side for a moment, we need thinkers, we need readers and researchers. We need people who are not afraid to be ridiculed, to stand out from the mob. 

OK, anyone with me, willing to question, to investigate, to think, not afraid to be ridiculed? Some of us have learned that religious, military and political leaders are out to exploit the gullible.


In 1893, Orlando Ferguson, a real estate developer based in South Dakota, drew a map of the Earth that combined biblical and scientific knowledge in a unique way…

If you were to take a donut and press it into wet cement and then remove the donut, Bingham explained, the rounded impression it left in the cement would be what is known in mathematics as an inverse toroid.

“It’s pretty clever because it explains the Columbus phenomenon, where you see ships coming in over the horizon and gradually the mast gets taller and taller until you can see the ship,” Bingham said…

“at the time people actually believed this stuff!”,,,

Incredibly, some people still do. The Flat Earth Society is an active organization currently led by a Virginian man named Daniel Shenton. Though Shenton believes in evolution and global warming, he and his hundreds, if not thousands, of followers worldwide also believe that the Earth is a disc that you can fall off of. 

This last assertion is indicative of the insults heaped on people who dare to question the current scientific paradigm, whatever it is at the moment, however often scientific theories are disproved and replaced. Bullying indicates insecurity and lack of authority, and only reinforces the conviction of free people to stand their ground.

Apparent evidence for a flat model, added to questionable or obviously faked evidence for both a globe model and access to outer space, inspires those of us without a herd mentality to question and investigate for ourselves.

“I haven’t taken this position just to be difficult,” Shenton told The Guardian last year.

“To look around, the world does appear to be flat, so I think it is incumbent on others to prove decisively that it isn’t. And I don’t think that burden of proof has been met yet.”

To Mr. Shenton, we offer this NASA/NOAA GOES-13 satellite image of our planet as it looked on March 2, 2010.


Seriously? Natalie Wolchover, the author of the above article, offers one single photograph from NASA to prove the globe earth model?

To Ms. Wolchover, I offer these NASA images of our planet as they told us it looked over the last 50 years.


More detail for those interested in this subject in the post Cosmology: Fake It ‘Til You Make It.

Are you putting your trust in a secret branch of government that “proves” its case for a globe earth that rotates around a stationary sun with contradictory “photographic“ “evidence” that couldn’t hold up in a court of law for child support payments?

You shouldn’t. Not only because North America apparently shrunk in just one year without anyone on earth noticing, but because science spokesman Neil DeGrasse Tyson says the earth is not a sphere after all.


This new shape takes into allowance a wider circumference in the southern hemisphere following an onslaught of evidence opposing the sphere-shaped earth.

The only way that airline flight routes make sense is on a flat earth model.



Again, we find the globe model adherents “debunking” by distracting from the real issue, which is NOT claiming that ALL Southern Hemisphere flights make stopovers in the northern hemisphere, simply that ANY do in a bizarrely extended flight path when plotted on a globe model.


I also find it fascinating that the majority of current travel patterns still cross through the Middle East. It’s like the Middle East is more accurately named Middle Earth. Oh, wait, it is. The Medi-terra-nean.

A second issue that is ignored, but glaringly evident by its absence in the global earth argument is that NO Southern Hemisphere flight paths take a direct route across what is depicted as the South Pole. Unlike with the flight paths over the North Pole, which were hindered only by the Cold War. (Get it? Cold…)



One unarguable scientific fact is that

the maps attempting to represent a round globe are KNOWN to be false.

This is not a Creationism argument. This is a long-standing and well-known problem within cartography.

True size of countries animation Mercator

Finally, a World Map that Doesn’t Lie

Our maps have been lying to us for centuries.

The standard classroom maps we all learned geography from are based on the Mercator projection, a 16th century rendering that preserved lines used for navigation while hideously distorting the true sizes of continents and oceans further from the equator…

For centuries, cartographers have made numerous attempts to account for the inconsistency…The problem was so widespread that a French mathematician even developed an eponymous equation to quantify the degree of distortion that a map experienced.

The Peters Projection World Map is one of the most stimulating, and controversial, images of the world. When this map was first introduced by historian and cartographer Dr. Arno Peters at a Press Conference in Germany in 1974 it generated a firestorm of debate…The Peters Projection is an area accurate map.


Sinusoidal Projection: …succeeds in presenting a more accurate view of the poles, but at the cost of misshapen continents and bent meridians.


Robinson Projection: …pulling out the edges of the map to mimic a sphere…It was used by both Rand McNally and the National Geographic Society at one point.


Bonne Projection: …dates back to the 16th century. The heart shape preserves integrity near the center, but gets progressively more unrealistic as it moves outward.


Armadillo Projection: …keeps the continents in decent shape while causing the oceans to appear smaller, and cutting off half of Australia and all of New Zealand.


The 2016 winner of Japan’s prestigious Good Design,..preserves the true dimensions of the continents by angling them outward instead of stretching them…Their website states that the goal was to create a map better suited to address the problems of the 21st century, including rapidly diminishing sea ice and territorial claims of marine territory, by more accurately depicting what areas near the poles actually look like.

Called the AuthaGraph, the result is a map that looks a little different that most of us are used to…Most importantly, the continents are all rendered as they actually appear. Africa has regained its geographic primacy while North America and Europe are shrunk back to their true sizes. The oceans, too, are finally represented accurately. By breaking longstanding rules governing how the continents and lines of latitude and longitude should appear, Narukawa has achieved a geographically accurate depiction of Earth.

I challenge you to paste this map onto a ball while maintaining accurate rendering of the sizes, shapes and contiguity of the continents and oceans.


Antarctica is the fifth-largest continent in terms of total land area. 

But to this we must add the rest of the total area of the region called The AntarcticThis is bounded by the Antarctic Convergence…an uneven line of latitude where the northward-flowing Antarctic waters meet the rest of the world’s oceans. The Antarctic region is reported to cover approximately 20 percent of the Southern Hemisphere.

map-1The Antarctic Ice Sheet extends beyond the land-continent in its winter – the northern latitudes’ summer, to about 7.3 million square miles.To give some sense of the size, the greatest diameter of the earth is said to be 25,000 miles at the equator. If this diameter is the edge of a circular plane instead of centered on a sphere, Antarctica’s 25,000 miles long ring would average 300 miles wide throughout. To put this in perspective, the 3,000 miles long Rocky Mountain range varies in width from 70 to 300 miles.

Then there is the fact that the landmass of Antarctica is covered with towering mountains.


Mountain Ranges in Antarctica

The Transantarctic with the Queen Maud, Queen Alexandra, Queen Elizabeth, Admiralty, and Royal Society Ranges, the Ellsworth with the Sentinel and Heritage Ranges, and the Tangra Mountains on the Livingston Island.

At 2,200 miles long, the Transantarctic Mountains are the fourth-longest mountain range in the world. About 98% is covered in ice, only the highest peaks are visible…ancient fossils indicate that the region once hosted a diverse range of plants and reptiles. Mount Kirkpatrick reaches a height of 14,855 feet.

To put that in perspective, the tallest mountain in the Rocky Mountain range is 14,439 feet high. The tallest mountain land-based mountain, Mount Everest, is 29,031.69 feet, almost 5.5 miles.

If any of Antarctica’s mountains have their base hidden below the ocean, they could be mammoth. Measured from bottom to top, the mountain island Mauna Kea is 33,497 feet tall.


Fear of falling is not the issue with people who question the globe model. The ice and high mountain ranges create a barrier preventing anything from “falling off the edge”.

“And beyond these mountains is a region the end of the great earth:” (Enoch 18:9-10)

While the accuracy of the autograph map layout was only scientifically acknowledged in 2016, it was, curiously, portrayed 70 years early as the the “ Official Seal and Emblem of the United Nations, Report of the Secretary-General, 15 October 1946″, while replacing The Antarctic with a wreath. 

flag_of_the_united_nations800This United Nations’ layout of the earth, as rendered in ancient maps, should give any thinking person a political reason to question the globe model and consider a flat earth model, with all the subsequent political implications about space. 

From an article published in November 2021:

Great power competition in Antarctica…is on the rise. There, strategic rivals increasingly assert territorial claims, contend for natural resources, and expand their scientific influence at earth’s southern extreme…

In December 1927, [US Navy Admiral] Byrd articulated…“Man cannot claim mastery of the globe until he conquers the Antarctic continent…”

Significantly…there has been a continuous American presence on the continent.

“And the evening and the morning were the second day.” (Genesis 1:2-8)

Day Three – Terraforming

Evening: restoring the work of the morning

“And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear…”

The Popol Vuh, the only Mesoamerican religious book to escape the Spaniards’ destruction of native culture, preserved the report of this event.

“Over a universe wrapped in the gloom of a dense and primeval night passed the god Hurakan, the mighty wind [spirit]He called out “earth,” and the solid land appeared“…It is worthy of notice that [this] embodies the general aboriginal idea of creation which prevailed in the New World. In many of them the central idea of creation is supplied by the brooding of a great bird [say, a dove?] over the dark primeval waste of waters.”


Night: opposed by rebel forces intent on destroying what had just been formed.


Night: Destruction

Geological findings indicate that meteors and comets have bombarded the earth, bringing massive quantities of elemental materials. These findings support the biblical prophecies of future recurrences of stars, i.e. flaming objects in the sky, falling to earth and wreaking great destruction.

the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken” (Matthew 24:29)

An impact event is commonly seen as a scenario that would bring about the end of civilization. In 2000, Discover Magazine published a list of 20 possible sudden doomsday scenarios with an impact event listed as the most likely to occur…

Major impact events have significantly shaped Earth’s history…

In 1980…[scientists] discovered unusually high concentrations of iridium in a specific layer of rock strata in the Earth’s crust. Iridium is an element that is rare on Earth but relatively abundant in many meteorites…This iridium layer at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary has been found worldwide at 100 different sites. Multidirectionally shocked quartz (coesite), which is normally associated with large impact events or atomic bomb explosions, has also been found in the same layer at more than 30 sites. Soot and ash at levels tens of thousands times normal levels were found with the above…

Probably the most convincing evidence for a worldwide catastrophe was the discovery of the crater which has since been named Chicxulub Crater…centered on the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico…180 km (110 mi) in diameter…

In the early history of the Earth.. bolide impacts were almost certainly common… Such impacts could have included strikes by asteroids hundreds of kilometers in diameter, with explosions so powerful that they vaporized all the Earth’s oceans. It was not until this heavy bombardment slackened that life appears…


“…and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.”

Day Four – Lights in the sky

Evening:  the vegetation just created needs sunlight, so immediately the sun is made.

And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

Notice that in the biblical version the sun is not the source but the bearer of light. Science confidently allows that the sun is the source of light, but can’t explain the nature of light. “In simple terms, light is one of nature’s freaky exceptions.”

Reputable scientists have concluded that “Something” had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.“

The Book of Enoch describes the placing of the sun, moon and stars in the firmament in greater detail, where it appears that the stars are called “luminaries”,  a category of the celestial beings commonly referred to as angels.

“Bless the LORD / YHVH / Creator, O my soul. O LORD my God, thou art very great…Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain...Who maketh his angels spirits; his ministers a flaming fire:” (Psalm 104)

We are grossly simplifying God’s creation when we assume that all the angels / God’s ministers look and function like the human males we know about in a handful of biblical accounts. Many angels correspond to animals. We accept that plants are living things, and have discovered that they are also sentient. There is no reason not to believe that other entities created to serve God’s creation and mankind are also sentient beings, i.e. remain connected to the source of life and consciousness, the Singularity.

we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now…waiting for…the redemption.” (Romans 8:12-23)

This is the first law of the luminaries…I beheld the gates whence the sun goes forth; and the gates where the sun sets; In which gates also the moon rises and sets; and I beheld the conductors of the stars, among those who precede them; six gates were at the rising, and six at the setting of the sun. All these respectively, one after another, are on a level; and numerous windows are on the right and on the left sides of those gates… (Enoch 71)

After this law I beheld another law of an inferior luminary, the name of which is the moon, and the orb of which is as the orb of heaven. Its chariot, which it secretly ascends, the wind blows; and light is given to it by measure…(Enoch 72)

These are the leaders of the chiefs of the thousands, those which preside over all creation, and over all the stars…Conductors of the days and nights: the sun, the moon, the stars, and all the ministers of heaven, which make their circuit with all the chariots of heaven.

Night: opposed by rebel forces.

Again we find that in the Sumerian account of creation that Enki’s son Marduk / Zeus / Satan attempted to replace YHVH’s host with his own during the first race to control space. It is reasonable to accept, as retained in Hindu records, that comets, meteors and meteorites are the circulating debris from such a space war.

He constructed stations for the gods,….Having opened up the gates on both sides…He strengthened the locks to the left and the right….He appointed him a creature of the night to signify the days.

The Greeks called the sun chariot rider Apollo, son of Zeus / Satan.


Yep. One and the same as NASA’s main player.

Morning: YHVH, again, wins his hyperdimensional other-worldly battle.

“And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.”

Day Five – Fish and Fowl


And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created…every living creature…which the waters brought forth abundantly…and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.”

Night: This would indicate massive sudden die-offs, which we should expect to find as fossils. There is geological evidence of catastrophism.


Morning: Survival, or resurrection, or remaking of some, as happened through the flood of Noah.

And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.”


Day Six – Land Animals & Mankind


And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so…and God saw that it was good.”

Night: opposed by rebel forces. Again, this would indicate massive die-offs, confirmed by the fossil record.



“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion.” (Genesis 1:26-31)

And then YHVH stepped back and let humanity take charge of protecting their Earth and their families.

Obviously, we humans need all the help we can get.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s