7) The Oneness Of Being

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.” (Genesis 1:26)

there was remarkable unanimity among the initiate priests of the ancient world. Their secret teachings are encoded in the sacred texts of the world’s great religions…a secret history of creation is encoded in the most familiar of these texts, Genesis…a few of its phrases can be opened up to reveal extraordinary new worlds of thought, mighty vistas of the imagination…

Today’s church preaches an extreme and radical monotheism…

Genesis 1:26 [sic] is usually translated as ‘In the beginning God made heaven and earth’, but…The passage properly reads, ‘In the beginning the gods made heaven and earth’…

To today’s most advanced thinkers, academics like Richard Dawkins, the Charles Simony Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford, and the other militant materialists who regulate and maintain the scientific world-view, the ‘mind of God’ is…the anthropomorphic fallacy. Even if we allow that God might conceivably exist, they say, why on earth should ‘He’ be like us? Why should ‘His’ mind be in any way like ours?

The fact is that they’re right. Of course there is no reason at all…unless it’s the other way round. In other words, the only reason why God’s mind might be like ours is if ours was made to be like His – that, is God made us in His image…

And what is that image?

“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one Lord:” (Deuteronomy 6:4)

Aha!! Contradiction! That means the Bible is incontrovertibly inaccurate!

“And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God? He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err…The Lord our God is one Lord.” (Mark 12:24-29)

What the Bible describes is not an error, but a paradoxical truth. As with any complex concept, it takes study to understand it. Some people don’t bother to study, but are they the ones whose opinion you should accept?

The noun Elohim is plural but it is always used with a singular verb when it speaks of the true God. This indicates a unity and diversity within the nature of God.

b655ef92663b61ff10f3f5343ea3f664No-one argues with unity and diversity with the nature of the fundamental building block of all matter.

An atom is the smallest unit of ordinary matter that forms a chemical element. Every solid, liquid, gas, and plasma is composed of neutral or ionized atoms…

Every atom is composed of a nucleus and one or more electrons bound to the nucleus. The nucleus is made of one or more protons and a number of neutrons… The protons have a positive electric charge, the electrons have a negative electric charge, and the neutrons have no electric charge…

The electrons of an atom are attracted to the protons in an atomic nucleus by the electromagnetic force. The protons and neutrons in the nucleus are attracted to each other by the nuclear force. This force is usually stronger than the electromagnetic force that repels the positively charged protons from one another. Under certain circumstances, the repelling electromagnetic force becomes stronger than the nuclear force. In this case, the nucleus splits and leaves behind different elements. This is a form of nuclear decay.

Interestingly, while science describes activity from the smallest to cosmic size masses, even the most advanced scientists of our time can’t explain what those forces are.

A theory of everything (TOE) is a hypothetical framework explaining all known physical phenomena in the universe. Researchers have searched for such a model ever since the development of quantum mechanics and Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity in the early 20th century.

[O]ne of the simplest but most powerful equations ever to be written down, E = mc2...

What this equation means is thoroughly world-changing. As Einstein himself put it:

“mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing — a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind…”

Energy can be used to make mass out of nothing… except pure energy

Anyone who learned the most basic algebra can rearrange Einstein’s equation to understand that energy/constant of speed of light2 = mass 

But there is a third component in Einstein’s theory of relativity that can’t be ignored: the work involved in creating mass.

work-force-and-energy-3-728_orig

[A]ll the forces that we experience every day (and many that we don’t realize we experience every day) can be whittled down to just four fundamental forces:

  1. Electromagnetism.
  2. The strong force.
  3. The weak force.
  4. Gravity.

These are called the four fundamental forces of nature, and they govern everything that happens in the universe…

“To happen” is another way of saying action taking place, i.e. work.

During the mid-20th century, physicists developed the Standard Model, which has been called the “theory of almost everything.” It describes the inter-actions of all known subatomic particles and three of the four fundamental forces:

  1. electromagnetism
  2. the strong and
  3. weak nuclear forces…

NASA Question of the Month:

What is gravity? Answer: We don’t really know [Emphases added]…we do not know what gravity “is” in any fundamental way – we only know how it behaves.

There is no theory of gravity that fully explains the observed effects of gravity.

Sir Isaac Newton’s explanation [from the 18th century] of how it works was based on the observations that were available at his time, including the falling of objects of mass as apples on or near to the Earth’s surface, and the orbits of the Planets and the Moon. He assumed that there was a force from the Sun and the Earth and other large bodies…

Professor Albert Einstein…produced a General Theory of Relativity that described the movement of bodies in an energy field causing gravity effects. It does not cover all observed gravity and has to be tweaked…by a Cosmological Constant.

The latest theory, by a Professor Verlinde, is being studied and shows some promise, but it is strictly theoretical and will be difficult to understand since it is based on the existence of energy not proven to exist. 

the weak nuclear force is highly interesting.The weak force or weak nuclear force is the only fundamental force that is aware [isn’t awareness an aspect of intelligence?] of the spin of the [subatomic] particle and can categorise [i.e. direct] the particles into either particle or antiparticle…[isn’t categorizing a intelligent intervention?]

  • We know that while studying the weak nuclear forces the parity of the particle plays a very important role. But the weak nuclear force violates the parity….

  • The weak interactions also violate CPT conservation.

It sounds like this force is also not “known,” only its behavior. 

The strong force was first proposed to explain why atomic nuclei do not fly apart. It seemed that they would do so due to the repulsive electromagnetic force between the positively charged protons located in the nucleus…..

Again, the existence of this force is based solely on a hypothetical explanation for observed activity.

The outstanding question of the four fundamental forces is whether they’re actually manifestations of just a single great force of the universe. If so, each of them should be able to merge with the others, and there’s already evidence that they can.

  1. In 1905 Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity established beyond a doubt that both [electricity and magnetism] are aspects of one common phenomenon.At a practical level, however, electric and magnetic forces behave quite differently and are described by different equations.
  2. Physicists…won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1979 for unifying the electromagnetic force with the weak force to form the concept of the electroweak force.
  3. Physicists…aim to unite the electroweak force with the strong force to define an electronuclear force, which models have predicted but researchers have not yet observed.
  4. The final piece of the puzzle would then require unifying gravity with the electronuclear force to develop the so-called theory of everything, a theoretical framework that could explain the entire universe.

3204943019_1fee182f41_b

 

The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory’s Collider Detector outside Batavia, Ill.

In results released on Thursday, April 7, 2022, scientists at the lab calculated that the W boson, a fundamental particle of physics, weighs a bit more than their theoretical rulebook for the universe tells them it should…

“It’s not just something is wrong,”…“It literally means something fundamental in our understanding of nature is wrong.”

The physicists at the lab crashed particles together over ten years and measured the mass of 4 million W bosons…

The result is so extraordinary it must be confirmed by another experiment, scientists say. If is confirmed, it would present one of the biggest problems yet with scientists’ detailed rulebook for the cosmos, called the standard model.

Are we all straight on what the physicists don’t know?

Great. Moving on, let’s review what physicists know the most about – the first unified force that was discovered – the electromagnetic force, AKA Light.

The Enduring Mystery of Light 

[D]efining light is a bit of a philosophical quandary. It doesn’t help that light continue to surprise us, with novel materials that alter light’s speed and trajectory in unexpected ways.

[I]t might be better to concentrate on what light does. Light shakes, twists and shoves the charged particles (like electrons) that reside in all materials.

These light actions are wavelength-specific. Or to say it another way, each material responds only to a particular set of wavelengths.

Take an apple, for instance. Radio waves and X-rays go essentially straight through it, whereas visible light is stopped by various apple molecules that either absorb the light as heat or reflect it back out.

If the reflected light enters our eyes, it will stimulate color receptors (cones) that are specifically “tuned” to either long, medium or short wavelengths. The brain compares the different cone responses to determine that the apple reflects “red” light.

Here are some other examples of light’s specific activities.

  • Radio waves from a local station cause the free electrons in a radio’s antenna to oscillate. Electronics tuned to the station’s frequency (or wavelength) can decode the oscillating signal into music or words. 
  • A microwave oven heats food from the inside out because microwaves penetrate the surface to rotate water molecules contained in the food. This molecular shuffling generates heat.
  • Standing next to a camp fire, infrared light vibrates molecules in our skin to make us warm. Conversely, we constantly lose heat when these same molecules emit infrared light.
  • In sunlight, several visible and ultraviolet wavelengths are missing, or dark. These “shadows” are due to the capture of photons by atoms, like hydrogen and helium, that make up the sun. The captured photon energy is used to boost the atoms’ electrons from one energy level to another.
  • An X-ray image of a skeleton is due to the fact that X-rays pass through soft tissue but are blocked by dense bone. However, even when just passing through, X-rays and gamma-rays ionize molecules along their path, meaning they strip electrons from the molecules. The ionized molecules can directly or indirectly damage DNA in a cell. Some of these genetic alterations may lead to cancer.

All this shows that light wears many different hats in its manipulation of matter.

It is perhaps fitting then that light’s true identity…is unanswerable.

Astronomers use many types of instruments to sense the electromagnetic spectrum, AKA Light.

Radio telescopes 

We are familiar with receivers that convert electromagnetic radio waves to mechanical vibrations in the speaker to create the sound waves we can hear.

Naturally occurring radio waves are extremely weak by the time they reach us from space. A cell phone signal is a billion billion times more powerful than the cosmic waves our telescopes detect.

Because radio waves are so long and cosmic radio sources are extremely weak, radio telescopes are the largest telescopes in the world.

looksouth

[T]he Very Large Array, 27 huge, white radio antennae arranged in a massive Y off US Route 60. Each dish is 230 tons and 82 feet in diameter, and by electronically combining all the data from the 27 dishes, astronomers can simulate the sensitivity of a dish with a diameter of 422 feet: bigger than any single dish in the world. Since its construction in the late 1970s, research has been conducted here on supernovae, black holes, dark energy and SETI, the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life.

Don’t let a tsunami of words and ideas overwhelm you. That’s what slick salesmen do, make you feel that the salesmen’s knowledge is so superior and unquestionable. We don’t need to have an advanced degree in physics from MIT to deal with this stuff. We just need to recognize when we are being conned so we don’t buy into the program.

This article states that radio telescopes are being used to research such and such. OK, SETI I get. Radio telescopes can pick up radio transmissions, both terrestrial and extra-terrestrial. You don’t think the military is going to let that equipment stay tuned to outer space, really now.

How do radio waves investigate black holes, which are strictly theoretical to start with, and suck in everything around it, including electromagnetism? 

I would imagine a supernova would make a lot of noise, but how does that help understand the really important stuff? Just compare to the earth’s equivalent – an atomic bomb. How much of the study of the cause and effects of the bomb focused on the sound it made?

Radio waves are being used to study dark energy? They know NOTHING about dark energy. Whatever they hear out there they can’t begin to attribute to an idea that hasn’t proven to be real.

People can dodge the mental gymnastics of reading between the lines, but that just makes the con man’s job all the easier. The bottom line is that with just a basic education we can recognize the discrepancies in what they’re telling us and recognize that there is something more going on that they are not telling us.

Microwave telescopes

[M]icrowaves…are very similar to radio waves but with a shorter wavelength and higher energy...

A regular oven heats the air inside the oven, and this hot air gradually transfers its heat energy to the food. This type of heat transfer is a slow, inefficient process. Microwaves, on the other hand, efficiently deposit their energy directly into the food, agitating the molecules and quickly creating widespread heat within the food.

The Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, or CMB for short, is a faint glow of light that fills the universe, falling on Earth from every direction with nearly uniform intensity. It is the residual heat of creation [Newspeak Alert! Appropriating concept-specific terms!] –the afterglow of the big bang–streaming through space these last 14 billion years like the heat from a sun-warmed rock, reradiated at night.

The CMB is the oldest light we can see--It is a relic of the universe’s infancy, a time when it was not the cold dark place it is now, but was instead a firestorm of radiation and elementary particles. The familiar objects that surround us today–stars, planets, galaxies and the like–eventually coalesced from these particles as the universe expanded and cooled.

Are you picking up on what this article is presenting as “facts”?

1) Hubble’s data is being interpreted to claim support the Big Bang model. It is not being studied to discover what is unknown.

2) Since microwaves are outside the visible spectrum, this is sloppy reporting at the least, certainly flagrant disregard for scientific accuracy, to report “CMB is the oldest light we can see.” Later on in the article there is an acknowledgement of sensing not by sight, but by “temperature”, but can we recognize the subtle but persistent indoctrination going on?

The CMB  represents a temperature of about 2.7 Kelvin [or -460 degrees Fahrenheit]. Astronomers consider that diffuse temperature as microwave radiation and use the minor fluctuations in the “temperature” of the CMB to learn more about the origins and evolution of the universe.

3) This article states that the instruments are picking up heat. Not when it comes to CMB, they aren’t. -460 degrees Fahrenheit is not heat. It is beyond cold. 

4) Astronomers consider that diffuse temperature as microwave radiation. Remember, microwave are sensed by their activity of depositing themselves into matter which causes the matter to then heat up. How do you know your microwave did its job? When the potato is baked, not by the diffuse temperature throughout the microwave oven. That’s what’s unique about microwaves.

I wonder how long a CMB microwave producing -460 degrees Fahrenheit would take to bake a potato?

5) Astronomers are going to use the minor fluctuations in the CMB to learn more about the origins and evolution of the universe? The entire Cosmic Microwave Background is a Wizard of Oz magic show! It is not light, it is not heat and yet it is presented as the “relic” of the “firestorm of radiation” present at the Big Bang which itself has never been proven and for which there is much evidence to disprove.

X-rays come from objects heated to many millions of degrees.

Really? That’s not how X-rays are generated in machines on earth.

Gamma rays are the shortest wavelength of light and deadly to humans. They sense violent explosions, cosmic radioactive decay, and even the destruction of antimatter. 

I’m confused. This report is stating that any gamma rays sensed by equipment are KNOWN to have been emitted by explosions, cosmic radioactive decay and the destruction of antimatter. So is Hubble helping us discover an unknown cosmos or explaining a known entity to us?

Surely the reader can recognize the slick advertising in these reports. Don’t read the fine print, just buy into what they’re selling.

The Cosmic Origins Spectrograph reads ultraviolet light. This spectrograph studies how galaxies, stars and planets formed and changed…

The name alone of this device is unscientific. It is not gathering raw data to examine uncritically. It is presenting support for an a priori claim. And how does ultraviolet light at one point in time, or even decades of Hubble activity, show how galaxies, stars and planets form and change over billions of years? Do you see where you’re expected to admit you’re too ignorant to understand the big words, and simply place your trust in the astrophysicists’ claims? 

The Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer, or NICMOS, sees objects in deep space by sensing the heat they emit.

From NASA’s website: Imagine the Universe!

Parrot in visible light Parrot in infrared light

Image of a parrot in visible light (left) and infrared light (right). Infrared shows us where things are warm or hot. (Credit: NASA/IPAC via the Cool Cosmos site)

Seriously? Since when does temperature correlate with all the detail of three dimensional objects with texture, weight, color, solid to gaseous state? Can the most experienced fireman make out the details inside when he looks at a blazing house fire? And Hubble is looking from just HOW FAR AWAY?

It captures images and it is also a spectrograph. NICMOS helps scientists study how stars, galaxies and planetary systems form.

Again, how, exactly, does one establish a process as complicated and believed to have occurred over as extreme a length of time as the formation of the universe?

Images taken by Hubble have helped scientists estimate the age and size of the universe. Scientists believe the universe is almost 14 billion years old…

These are just statements, not data.

Ultraviolet telescopes hunt out the most energetic of stars.

A pillar composed of gas and dust in the Carina Nebula is…shown below in the visible light image from the Hubble Space Telescope….when the pillar is viewed using the infrared portion of the spectrum (right), it practically disappears, revealing the…stars behind the column of gas and dust.

Two images showing the Carina Nebula in different wavelengths. The Visible Light image reveals a brilliant display of yellow and gold dust lit up by stars. The Infrared image only shows the bright stars that were behind the dust.

But hold on! That “visible light image” on the left has been, as NASA frankly states, IMAGINED. 

And ultraviolet sensors reveal heat, which then have been interpreted as stars by NASA.

Do you grasp the application of what that LiveScience article is reporting as a FACT from KNOWN PHYSICS? 

Physicists KNOW that astrophysicists scanning the entire range of the electromagnetic spectrum are ONLY PICKING UP DATA.  

This data CANNOT be interpreted visually with any certainty.

stsci-h-p2034a-f-1920x1080_0

New results from the Hubble Space Telescope SUGGEST (emphasis added) the formation of the first stars and galaxies in the early universe took place sooner than previously thought...This ARTIST’S IMPRESSION (emphasis added) presents the early universe.
Credits: ESA/Hubble, M. Kornmesser and NASA (emphasis added.)

Look through NASA’s Hubble websites for yourself and just consider the possibility that this is a massive propaganda campaign. We are just supposed take their word for everything. 

Our universe was born about 13.7 billion years ago in a massive expansion that blew space up like a gigantic balloon.

That, in a nutshell, is the Big Bang theory, which virtually all cosmologists and theoretical physicists endorse. 

However, inflation is not the only idea out there that tries to explain the universe’s structure. Theorists have come up with…the cyclic model, which is based on an earlier concept called the ekpyrotic universe.

The cyclic model posits that our universe consists of 11 dimensions, only four of which we can observe (three of space and one of time). Our four-dimensional part of the universe is called a brane (short for membrane).

There could be other branes lurking out there in 11-dimensional space, the idea goes.

(Posted on Space.com in 2011 and still published in 2021.)

Remember how this post began? I’ll paraphrase but you can confirm what I’m saying is in fact consistent with the exact quote.

Light is an enduring mystery. Light continues to surprise us. Light’s true identity is unanswerable.

The interaction of light and matter

One of the most interesting questions in the field is how light and matter interact with each other. For example, why are some materials transparent while others are not?

Can light change the properties of materials? 

  • Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921 for the photoelectric effect – photons that hit a material can be absorbed by it and excite its electrons to a higher energy state, but only if the photons possess the required amount of energy. 
  • The photoelectric effect was an important milestone in our understanding of the interaction between light and matter. A photon can be absorbed only if it can transfer all its energy to the material… In doing so the photon is absorbed in the material, which is then said to be opaque to light of the color of the photon. If the photon does not get absorbed, it simply passes through the material. 
  • Since a photon excites electrons when it gets absorbed, it can change some of the properties of the material.

The Large Hadron Collider is where the interaction of energy and matter is studied at the most basic level.

The LHC is the crown jewelof CERN, the European particle physics laboratory that was founded after World War II [like rocket science]… Now scientists from six continents and 100 countries conduct experiments there…

The LHC collides two beams of protons together at the highest energies ever achieved in a laboratory. Six experiments located around the 17-mile (27 km) ring study the results of these collisions with massive detectors built in underground caverns…The goal is to understand the nature of the most basic building blocks of the universe and how they interact with each other. This is fundamental science at its most basic.

Dark matter discovered: Scientists believe they have found elusive particle that makes up 90% of Universe

The COSMOS survey (artist's impression)

This dark matter map was created by the Hubble Telescope by measuring light from distant stars thought to have been deflected by dark matter. The map of half the Universe reveals [if this assertion doesn’t demonstrate propaganda I don’t know what does] dark matter filaments, collapsing under the relentless pull of gravity and growing clumpier over time.

Dark matter is believed to make up 90 per cent of the mass of the Universe. We can’t see it but scientists think it is there due to the gravitational force it exerts…

What Is Dark Energy?

More is unknown than is known. We know how much dark energy there is because we know how it affects the universe’s expansion. Other than that, it is a complete mystery. But it is an important mystery. It turns out that roughly 68% of the universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 27%. The rest – everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter – adds up to less than 5% of the universe…

One explanation for dark energy is that it is a property of space. Albert Einstein was the first person to realize that empty space is not nothing. Space has amazing properties, many of which are just beginning to be understood. The first property that Einstein discovered is that it is possible for more space to come into existence. Then one version of Einstein’s gravity theory, the version that contains a cosmological constant, makes a second prediction: “empty space” can possess its own energy. Because this energy is a property of space itself, it would not be diluted as space expands. As more space comes into existence, more of this energy-of-space would appear…no one understands why the cosmological constant should even be there, much less why it would have exactly the right value to cause the observed acceleration of the universe…

We are much more certain what dark matter is not than we are what it is. First, it is dark, meaning that it is not…visible…Second, it is not in the form of…normal matter…Third, dark matter is not antimatter, because we do not see the unique gamma rays that are produced when antimatter annihilates with matter. Finally, we can rule out large galaxy-sized black holes…

Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs)…are thought to make up dark matter

The Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) is using 30 ultra-cold germanium and silicon detectors far away from the hail of cosmic rays that strike Earth every day. It is believed the crystals will vibrate if struck by a WIMP.

Now head of CDMS Dan Bauer said they have spotted two particles with all the expected characteristics of dark matter.

The physicist cautions, however, that there’s about a one in four chance that ordinary subatomic particles, rather than dark matter, could account for the signals.

The Large Hadron Collider

The Large Hadron Collider is expected to create Big Bang conditions next month. It is hoped the accelerator will create dark matter particles.

Theorist Craig Hogan from the University of Chicago said…three or four more WIMP-like interactions recorded over the next few years by the experiment, would constitute proof of dark matter. Seriously? Proof?

That would be a huge transformation in how we do science,’ Dr Hogan said.

Can you not recognize that what has been reported – in this article at least – has no substance on which to place our trust in the “theorists”. Make sure you get that point. This is imagination. These are ideas based on other ideas. There is no empirical data underpinning any of these “hypotheses” allowing them to be elevated to the status of a theory.

Science employs a particular vocabulary for describing how ideas are proposed, tested, and supported or disproven. And that’s where we see the difference between a hypothesis and a theory.

hypothesis is an assumption, something proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true.

In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review. You ask a question, read up on what has been studied before, and then form a hypothesis…

A hypothesis is usually tentative, an assumption or suggestion made strictly for the objective of being tested…

theory, in contrast, is a principle that has been formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data…Because of the rigors of experimentation and control, its likelihood as truth is much higher than that of a hypothesis.

1355884699_pie-chart

So 90% or more of the universe is undetectable by any known instruments so is unable to be tested. Its existence is based on another another unknown condition – gravity.

Now let’s consider an alternative explanation for the cosmic origin and current state of being.

physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)announced they had discovered a Higgs-like particle at long last. If the new particle turns out to be the Higgs, it will confirm nearly five decades of particle physics theory, which incorporated the Higgs boson into the family of known particles and equations that describe them known as the Standard Model.

The Higgs boson, sometimes referred to as the ‘god particle,’ much to the chagrin of scientists who prefer the official name…signals the existence of the Higgs field, an invisible energy field present throughout the universe that imbues other particles with mass…The Higgs field emerged at the birth of the universe.

From the 1920s up through the 1970s, scientists thought they had a satisfactory story for our cosmic origins…All of them, however…asked some variety of the question, “why did the Universe begin with a specific set of properties, and not others?”

  • Why was the Universe born perfectly spatially flat,
  • with its total matter-and-energy density perfectly balancing the initial expansion rate?
  • Why is the Universe the exact same temperature, to 99.997% accuracy, in all directions, even though the Universe hasn’t existed for enough time for different regions to thermalize and reach an equilibrium state?
  • Why, if the Universe reached these ultra-high energies early on, are there no high-energy relics (like magnetic monopoles) predicted by generic extensions to the Standard Model of particle physics?
  • And why, since the entropy / chaos of a system always increases, was the Universe born in such a low-entropy configuration relative to its [organized] configuration today?…

In physics, we have two ways of dealing with questions like these. Because all of these questions are about initial conditions ⁠— i.e., why did our system (the Universe) begin with these specific conditions and not any others ⁠— we can take our pick of the following:

  1. We can attempt to concoct a theoretical mechanism that transforms arbitrary initial conditions into the ones we observe, including that reproduces all the successes of the hot Big Bang, and then tease out new predictions that will allow us to test the new theory against the old theory of the plain old Big Bang without any alterations.
  2. Or, we can simply assert that the initial conditions are what they are and not only is there no explanation for those values/parameters, but we don’t need one. [Emphases added.]

Although it’s not clear to everyone, the first option is the only one that’s scientific; the second option, often touted by those who philosophize about the landscape or the multiverse, is tantamount to giving up on science entirely. [Emphasis added.]

The theory of evolution, both currently and as first conceived by Darwin and Wallace, neither provides, nor requires, an explanation for the origin of life.

And so Evolution, which leaves the explanation of origins out of its purview, has given up on science entirely.

And so has Cosmology, which stubbornly holds to the Big Bang Theory despite all the evidence against it as well.

We are left with ancient revelation of a hyper dimensional Being as the infinite singularity, the fundamental force perceived as sub-forces by humanity’s limited sensory and mental capacities. The God particle, all-pervasive invisible energy whose presence converts energy to mass.

“the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible…he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” (Colossians 1:15-17)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s